Benefit of Permanent Stimulation of the Left Branch of the His Bundle Versus Right Ventricular Stimulation After Atrioventricular Node Ablation for Rapid Atrial Fibrillation (LEANA)

February 5, 2026 updated by: University Hospital, Rouen
The objective of the study is to evaluate the functional benefit of left bundle branch of His pacing compared to right ventricular pacing in patients implanted with a pacemaker prior to a atrioventricular node ablation procedure for rapid atrial fibrillation

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Caen, France
        • Recruiting
        • CHU de Caen
        • Contact:
          • Pierre OLLITRAULT, Pr

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1/ Pacemaker implanted patient with LBTP lead and back-up right ventricular lead who subsequently underwent successful atrioventricular node ablation for rapid AF 2) NAV ablation procedure performed less than 15 days ago 3) Age ≥ 18 years 4) Woman of childbearing age with effective contraception (estrogen-progestin or intrauterine device or tubal ligation) for at least 1 month and for the duration of the study, and a negative urine pregnancy test by B-HCG at inclusion Or, Postmenopausal woman: confirmatory diagnosis (non-medically induced amenorrhea for at least 12 months prior to the inclusion visit).

5) Membership of a social security scheme 6) Patient follow-up feasible 7) Patient has read and understood the information leaflet and signed the informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Impairment of autonomy such that a maximal cardiorespiratory effort test (VO2 Max test) cannot be performed under good conditions (ADL scale < 5).
  2. LVEF < 40% at inclusion
  3. Person deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision, or person under court protection, sub-guardianship or curatorship.
  4. Patient participating in another interventional trial
  5. Any history of illness or psychological or sensory abnormality likely to prevent the subject from fully understanding the conditions required for participation in the protocol, or from giving informed consent.
  6. Pregnant, parturient or breast-feeding women, or those without proven contraception

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: left bundle branch of His pacing (LBTP) then right ventricular pacing (RVP)
left bundle branch of His pacing
right ventricular pacing
Experimental: right ventricular pacing (RVP) then left bundle branch of His pacing (LBTP)
left bundle branch of His pacing
right ventricular pacing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Maximum Oxygen Consumption (VO2 max) in mL/min/kg.
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
walking test distance covered
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
echography criteria: LVEF (%), indexed left ventricular end-systolic volume (mL/m2), indexed cardiac output (L/min/m2), inter-ventricular asynchrony criteria (aortic pre-ejection time - pulmonary pre-ejection time)
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Determination of NT pro BNP or BNP
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Physical component of quality-of-life scale (SF-36)
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months
Medico-economic criteria: incremental cost-utility ratio of LBTP versus RVP
Time Frame: 18 months
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Corentin CHAUMONT, MD, University Hospital, Rouen

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 27, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 27, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 27, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 25, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

September 29, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 10, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 5, 2026

Last Verified

February 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2021/0379/HP

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Atrial Fibrillation Rapid

Clinical Trials on left bundle branch of His pacing

Subscribe