Feasibility of Peer-mentor Delivered Substance Use Brief Intervention for Adolescents in Kenya

September 15, 2022 updated by: Moi University

A Pilot Study to Evaluate the Feasibility & Acceptability of a Peer-mentor Delivered Substance Use Screening and Brief Intervention for Adolescents in Kenya

Adolescent substance use is prevalent in Kenya and in the US, and is associated with significant negative health and social outcomes. Unfortunately adolescents in both regions have limited access to substance use treatment because services are costly and scarce. The aim of this study is to pilot study procedures and obtain data on intervention acceptability, fidelity and preliminary efficacy, to determine the feasibility of a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the efficacy of a peer-delivered substance use brief intervention among adolescents attending an out-patient clinic in Kenya.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Adolescent substance use is prevalent in Kenya and in the US, and is associated with significant negative health and social outcomes. Unfortunately adolescents in both regions have limited access to substance use treatment because services are costly and scarce. Substance use screening and brief Intervention (SBI) delivered in primary health care by peer-mentors, represents a promising strategy for overcoming these barriers to substance use treatment for adolescents.

Objective: The aim of this study is to pilot study procedures and obtain data on intervention acceptability, fidelity and preliminary efficacy, to determine the feasibility of a definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the efficacy of a peer-delivered substance use SBI among adolescents attending an out-patient clinic in Kenya.

Design: The study will use both qualitative and quantitative methods to meet its objectives

Intervention: SBI includes a single session of screening using the Alcohol, Smoking & Substance Use Involvement Screening Test for Youth questionnaire (ASSIST-Y), followed by a brief intervention (20-30 minutes of motivational interviewing) for those with moderate and high risk substance use. Three peers will be trained for five days on how to deliver the SBI. The peer-mentors will receive regular supervision throughout the study implementation process.

Outcomes: SBI feasibility will be defined by the extent to which fidelity to the SBI is maintained and the preliminary effects of the SBI on substance use and quality of life outcomes. SBI acceptability will be evaluated from the perspective of the adolescents using qualitative interviews guided by Sekhon's theoretical framework of acceptability. Feasibility of conducting a future full-scale RCT will be explored by measuring outcomes such as study participation rate, willingness to be randomized, study completion rates and ability to measure effectiveness outcomes.

Investigating team and future plans: This study will be conducted by a team including faculty from Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital, faculty from Indiana University, and a team from the National Authority for Campaign Against Alcohol and drug abuse (NACADA). Our team has experience implementing and scaling peer-led substance use SBIs for adolescent populations. If the SBI and its delivery are found to be feasible and acceptable the plan is to partner with the government to conduct a full-scale multi-site RCT in Kenya and Indiana.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • RIFT Valley
      • Eldoret, RIFT Valley, Kenya, 30100
        • Florence Jaguga

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 24 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants will be adolescents attending the Rafiki clinic, aged 15-24 years and who have moderate or high risk substance use as defined by the Alcohol, Smoking & Substance Use Involvement Screening Test for Youth questionnaire (ASSIST-Y) scores

Exclusion Criteria:

  • The following youth will be excluded: (i) those ill during the appointment (ii) those who decline to assent/consent (iii) those already enrolled in the Fogarty project.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention arm
Participants randomized to the intervention arm will undergo a substance use screening and brief intervention delivered by the peer-mentors. Screening will be performed using the ASSIST-Y (28). The brief intervention will be delivered in a single session (20-30 minutes) using the FRAMES model i.e.(i) providing feedback on screening results (ii) ensuring responsibility on the part of the adolescents (iii) giving clear advice to stop/cut down (iv) giving menu of options (alternative healthy behaviors to engage in) (v) expressing empathy, and (vi) encouraging self-efficacy (15). The BI will be delivered for the highest scoring substance or the one the adolescent identifies as the most problematic.
The BI will be delivered in a single session (20-30 minutes) using motivational interviewing techniques and the FRAMES model i.e.(i) providing feedback on screening results (ii) ensuring responsibility on the part of the adolescents (iii) giving clear advice to stop/cut down (iv) giving menu of options (alternative healthy behaviors to engage in) (v) expressing empathy, and (vi) encouraging self-efficacy (15). The BI will be delivered for the highest scoring substance or the one the adolescent identifies as the most problematic.
Placebo Comparator: Control arm
Participants assigned to the control arm will participate in a substance use education intervention. This intervention will entail review of material in the NACADA substance use education manual for adolescents, and will be followed by a question and answer session. The manual contains summarized and simple information on the harms and myths related to alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, prescription medication and khat use, substances. This education intervention will be delivered over a single 20-30 minute session by a counselor stationed at Rafiki clinic.
This intervention will entail review of material in the NACADA substance use education manual for adolescents, and will be followed by a question and answer session. The manual contains summarized and simple information on the harms and myths related to alcohol, tobacco, cannabis, prescription medication and khat use, substances. This education intervention will be delivered over a single 20-30 minute session by a counselor stationed at Rafiki clinic.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in substance use scores (measured using ASSIST-Y)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months post-intervention.
The researchers will compare the changes in the mean ASSIST-Y scores between the two intervention and control arms
Change from baseline to 3 months post-intervention.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in quality of life scores (measured using the Brief Version WHO-Quality of life tool)
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 3 months post-intervention.
The researchers will compare the changes in the mean WHO-QOL scores between the intervention and control arms
Change from baseline to 3 months post-intervention.
Fidelity to the intervention assessed using a researcher designed rating scale
Time Frame: until completion of participant recruitment and follow-up, an average of 3 months
Fidelity checklists will be developed based on key elements of the intervention. Items will be rated by the SBI trainers on a 3-point scale.
until completion of participant recruitment and follow-up, an average of 3 months
Study Participation Rate
Time Frame: until completion of participant recruitment and follow-up, an average of 3 months
Number of participants who consent to take part in the study divided by the number of eligible patients. The researchers will also document reasons for refusal to participate in the study. Benchmark to establish feasibility for conducting a full-scale randomized trial: 80% of those who eligibility meet criteria consent to participate
until completion of participant recruitment and follow-up, an average of 3 months
Proportion of participants meeting inclusion criteria who get excluded
Time Frame: until completion of participant recruitment and follow-up, an average of 3 months
Number of participants excluded divided by number meeting inclusion criteria. The researchers will document reasons for exclusion; Benchmark to establish feasibility for conducting a full-scale randomized trial: 80% of those meeting inclusion criteria are not excluded
until completion of participant recruitment and follow-up, an average of 3 months
Proportion of participants willing to be randomized
Time Frame: until completion of participant recruitment and follow-up, an average of 3 months
Number of participants consenting to participate divided by number willing to be randomized to either study arm; Benchmark to establish feasibility for conducting a full-scale randomized trial: 80% of those consenting are willing to be randomized to either study arm
until completion of participant recruitment and follow-up, an average of 3 months
Study Completion Rate
Time Frame: Baseline, month 3
Number of participants who complete both the baseline and month 3 assessments/intervention divided by the number of participants enrolled in each study arm; Benchmark to establish feasibility for conducting a full-scale randomized trial: 80% complete both baseline and month 3 assessments
Baseline, month 3
Participant Burden
Time Frame: Baseline, month 3
Time required to complete data collection at each assessment time point. Benchmark to establish feasibility for conducting a full-scale randomized trial: 80% of participants complete study assessments and the SBI in less than 90 minutes at baseline; and study assessments in less than 60 minutes at month 3
Baseline, month 3
Data Completeness
Time Frame: Baseline, month 3
Percentage of questionnaires/study measures completed; Benchmark to establish feasibility for conducting a full-scale randomized trial: 80% of those who enroll will complete at least 80% of study questionnaires/measures
Baseline, month 3

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: FLORENCE M, JAGUGA, MMED, MOI TEACHING & REFERRAL HOSPITAL

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 15, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 15, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • MoiU6

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Substance Use

Clinical Trials on Substance use brief intervention (BI)

3
Subscribe