The Efficacy of Cervical Lordosis Rehabilitation for Nerve Root Function and Pain in Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy

September 16, 2022 updated by: Ibrahim Moustafa, Cairo University

The Efficacy of Cervical Lordosis Rehabilitation for Nerve Root Function and Pain in Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy: A Randomized Trial With 2-year Follow-up

To test the hypothesis that improvement of cervical lordosis (CL) in cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) will improve clinical features in a population suffering from CSR. Thirty chronic lower CSR patients with CL < 25° will be included. Patients will be assigned randomly into two equal groups, study and control . Both groups will receive neck stretching and exercises and infrared; additionally the study group will receive cervical extension traction. Treatments will be applied 3 time per week for 10 weeks after which groups will be followed for 3-months and 2-years. Amplitude of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials (DSSEPS), Cervical lordosis, and pain scales (NRS) will be measured.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Previous studies testing the effects of 3-point bending types of cervical traction, have not clarified exactly what impact the sagittal cervical curve correction has on nerve root function and pain responses associated with improving an abnormal cervical lordosis in cervical spondylotic patients. The present randomized controlled trial will be undertaken to investigate the neurophysiological and pain response outcomes of 3-point bending (2-way) traction compared to standard care in patient cases with lower cervical spine CSR, chronic pain, and with a verified hypo-lordosis of the cervical spine. The primary hypothesis of this study will be that cervical lordosis restoration will have short- and long-term effects on DSSEPs and pain outcomes in CSR patients.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt
        • Cairo university

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

36 years to 46 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Unilateral radiculopathy due to spondylotic changes of the lower cervical spine
  • Absolute rotatory angle is less than 20°
  • side to side amplitude differences of 50% or more in dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials measurement

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Central spinal canal stenosis
  • Rheumatoid arthritis
  • Vestibulobasilar insufficiency
  • Osteoporosis
  • Inability to tolerate the cervical extension position

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: two way traction
The study group will receive 3-point bending cervical extension traction following the protocol of Harrison et al. The duration of each session will starte at approximately three minutes and increased one minute per session until reaching the goal of 20 minutes per session
Exercises will be performed in the following order: 1) stretching towards lateral flexion for the upper part of the trapezius; 2) ipsilateral flexion and rotation for the scalene; 3) and flexion for the extensor muscles. Each maneuver will be held for 30 seconds as this is an optimum time to not create alteration in the evoked protentional. Each stretch will be repeated 3 times
During the traction, the head halter will be fixed posteriorly to cause slight distraction, retraction, and slight extension and at the same time a front anterior strap had weight will be applied over a pulley that allows transverse traction load to be applied to the apex of the participants cervical curve alteration. Weights will start at 15 lbs. (6.8 Kg) on the anterior strap and will increase over consecutive visits to patient tolerance or a maximum of 35 lbs. (15.9 Kg).
Active Comparator: traditional treatment
Stretching exercises: Patients will perform the stretching program 3 times a week; with a single session taking about 10 minutes to perform.
Exercises will be performed in the following order: 1) stretching towards lateral flexion for the upper part of the trapezius; 2) ipsilateral flexion and rotation for the scalene; 3) and flexion for the extensor muscles. Each maneuver will be held for 30 seconds as this is an optimum time to not create alteration in the evoked protentional. Each stretch will be repeated 3 times

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Change in amplitude of dermatomal somatosensory evoked potentials
Time Frame: will be measured at four intervals ;before treatment, after 10 weeks of treatment, at follow up of 3 months and at follow up of 2 years
In all dermatomes, two complete recording runs will be undertaken during each session, with averages of 250-1,200 cortical responses from scalp surface recording electrodes (C3'-C4' in a 10-20 electrode configuration) of the contralateral scalp to the C6, C7, and C8 dermatomes being stimulated
will be measured at four intervals ;before treatment, after 10 weeks of treatment, at follow up of 3 months and at follow up of 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The change in pain intensity
Time Frame: will be measured at four intervals ;before treatment, after 10 weeks of treatment, at follow up of 3 months and at follow up of 2 years
Measurement of pain will be performed by using a visual analogue scale (VAS). The subjects will be asked about the perception of pain using a 10-cm line with 0 (no pain) on one end and 10 (worst pain) on the other. subjects will be asked to place a mark along the line to denote their level of pain
will be measured at four intervals ;before treatment, after 10 weeks of treatment, at follow up of 3 months and at follow up of 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Ibrahim Moustafa, Professor, Cairo university

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2022

Last Verified

September 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Lordosis Rehabilitation

Clinical Trials on Stretching exercises

Subscribe