Social-cognitive Functioning: Validation of a New Neuropsychological Test (REALSOCOG)

March 11, 2026 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Social-cognitive Functioning: Validation of a New Neuropsychological Test and Prediction of Social Behavioural Disorders in Daily Life

It is now established that disturbances in social cognition are frequent in neurology and that they contribute to the development of social conduct disorders. Their assessment is therefore essential, particularly in order to propose early and adapted care. However, this assessment remains limited today. A new serious game-type test, REALSoCog, has been developed to address the shortcomings of current tools and to highlight disturbances in social behaviors. The latter are not always observed in consultation although they are often reported by caregivers. The objective of this research is therefore to validate the REALSoCog task in a pathological population (currently being standardized in the general population: CER-U, IRB N°: 00012020-115). The clinical interest of this task will be tested with a group of patients suffering from a neurodegenerative disease (Alzheimer's disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DCL), fronto-temporal lobar degeneration (FTD)) in order to assess its sensitivity and specificity in the detection of social-cognitive disturbances, and in particular in terms of social behaviors (detection of social behavioral disorders reported in daily life). The objective is also to document the socio-cognitive profiles in the mentioned diseases thanks to a more ecological test, and to better understand the links between socio-cognitive processes on the one hand, and individual characteristics on the other hand (e.g. mood and social participation).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

It is now established that disturbances in social cognition are frequent in neurology and that they contribute to the development of social conduct disorders. Their assessment is therefore essential, particularly in order to propose early and adapted care. However, this assessment remains limited today. A new serious game-type test, REALSoCog, has been developed to address the shortcomings of current tools and to highlight disturbances in social behaviors. The latter are not always observed in consultation although they are often reported by caregivers. The objective of this research is therefore to validate the REALSoCog task in a pathological population (currently being standardized in the general population: CER-U, IRB N°: 00012020-115). The clinical interest of this task will be tested with a group of patients suffering from a neurodegenerative disease (Alzheimer's disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DCL), fronto-temporal lobar degeneration (FTD)) in order to assess its sensitivity and specificity in the detection of social-cognitive disturbances, and in particular in terms of social behaviors (detection of social behavioral disorders reported in daily life). The objective is also to document the socio-cognitive profiles in the mentioned diseases thanks to a more ecological test, and to better understand the links between socio-cognitive processes on the one hand, and individual characteristics on the other hand (e.g. mood and social participation).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75013
        • Recruiting
        • Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

For patients:

  • Patient aged between 18 and 90 years
  • Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) score greater than or equal to 20
  • Patient able to express his or her non-opposition to participate in the study in an informed and autonomous manner
  • Patient with a neurodegenerative pathology: FTD, AD or LBD.

For caregivers:

  • Over 18 years of age
  • Regular contact with the patient (≥ 2 times per month)

Exclusion Criteria:

For patients:

  • Neurological or psychiatric comorbidity
  • Notable sensory disorders (e.g., profound or total deafness, age-related macular degeneration, blindness, etc.) that may interfere with experimental completion.
  • Opposition to participation in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients
Patients suffering from a neurodegenerative disease (Alzheimer's disease (AD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DCL) or fronto-temporal lobar degeneration (FTD))
Patients will be asked to perform the REALSoCog serious game-type social cognition assessment task developed by the LMC2 laboratory (UR 7536). Their performance will be compared to those of control individuals recruited in parallel (independant clinical study: CER-U, IRB N°: 00012020-115). Participants will be asked to think about 16 social situations (6 control situations and 10 experimental situations) encountered in a virtual environment representing a city. REALSoCog can be used on a laptop computer, without any additional technical device.
Other Names:
  • neuropsychological test
Social-cognitive tasks from the BCS (Ehrlé et al., 2011) will also be offered to patients to test the concurrent validity of REALSoCog. This battery assesses social cognition. It includes paper-and-pencil tasks.
Other Names:
  • Social-Cognition Battery
Other: Relatives
Caregivers or relatives of included patients, having regular contact with the patient (≥ 2 times per month).
Hetero-questionnaires assessing patients' social behavior will be transmitted to their relative or primary caregiver (Godefroy & le GREFEX, 2008; Gury and Ehrlé, in progress of validation) in order to verify the concurrent validity of REALSoCog. These hetero-questionnaires aim to identify and quantify the presence of social skills and behaviour disorders.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
rate of inappropriate behavioural intentions
Time Frame: 1 hour and a half
It is measured by the REALSoCog task through a question asking the participant to specify his behavioral intention in the case where he would have declared his intention to act in front of the social situation presented. These questions are asked for each social situation presented, i.e. for a total of 16 situations
1 hour and a half

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of Moral cognition
Time Frame: 1 hour and a half
The ability to detect moral transgressions, the ability to detect conventional transgressions, and the ability to detect control situations (non-transgressive situations) are measured by the question "Does this situation seem appropriate or inappropriate to you?" asked after each REALSoCog situation. The severity judgment of moral transgressions and the severity judgment of conventional transgressions are measured by the question "How inappropriate does it [the situation] seem to you?" asked after each response characterizing the situation presented as inappropriate in REALSoCog.
1 hour and a half
Evaluation of Empathy and emotional reactivity
Time Frame: 1 hour and a half

The intensity of emotional empathy and the intensity of emotional reactivity are measured by the question "How much are you affected by the situation? This question is asked after each experimental situation of REALSoCog (i.e. situations involving a transgression and situations constructed to elicit empathy), i.e. for 10 situations.

The valence and congruence of the emotions felt are measured by the question "The emotion you feel at the sight of this situation is: 1 (very negative) to 5 (very positive)". This question is asked after each experimental situation of REALSoCog (i.e. situations involving a transgression and situations constructed to elicit empathy), i.e. for 10 situations.

1 hour and a half
Assessment of theory of mind
Time Frame: 1 hour and a half

The ability to detect the intentionality of an action is measured by the question "Is the behavior of the [main protagonist in the situation] intentional? Yes / No". This question is asked for 5 REALSoCog situations.

The ability to characterize the valence of this intention and the average valence of the attributed intentions is measured by the question "In your opinion the intention is: 1 (very malicious) to 5 (very benevolent)". This question is asked for 5 REALSoCog situations.

The ability to infer an affect to others is measured by the question "How does [main protagonist of the situation] feel?". This question is asked for 8 REALSoCog situations.

The intensity of the affect attributed to others is measured by the question "How does [main protagonist of the situation] feel about [subject's response to the previous question]?" This question is asked for 8 REALSoCog situations.

1 hour and a half

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Marc VERNY, Pr, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 4, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

February 4, 2029

Study Completion (Estimated)

February 4, 2030

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

September 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 13, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alzheimer's Disease (AD)

Subscribe