- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05571761
Teleneuropsychological Intervention in Asymptomatic HIV Seropositive Patients: N&C NeuroChange
Feasibility and Usefulness of a Neuropsychological Telerehabilitation Program in Asymptomatic HIV Patients: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial
Currently 37.9 million people are living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) around the world (UNAIDS, 2018). Even with antiretroviral treatment (ART), the virus enters the central nervous system and can affect the following structures: amygdala, hippocampus, thalamus, parietal, frontal, temporal regions, orbitofrontal, cingulate, motor and sensory cortex; generating cognitive, behavioral and motor alterations, up to HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder (HAND) and occasionally HIV-associated dementia (HAD).
Few clinical studies have been conducted using computerized cognitive rehabilitation programs to counteract neuropsychological alterations. The aim of this project is to explore the feasibility of a cognitive stimulation program (CSP) developed to strengthen cognitive domains identified as impaired through a neuropsychological assessment in asymptomatic HIV+ patients adherent to ART, with the purpose of improving their quality of life and mood disorder.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted with a study group and a control group in waiting list. This design will be used because it allows to evaluate the feasibility of a teleneuropsychological intervention (N&C NeuroChange) and to identify a preliminary effect as a first approach in a given population, provides greater experimental control over the study variables and allows pre-intervention, post-intervention and follow-up comparisons.
Lancaster et al. (2004) state that n=30 is acceptable for a pilot study, while (Julious, 2005) suggest a minimum sample of n=12 per group. Therefore, 24 participants will be recruited for this study. This has already been implemented in other pilot studies that sought to identify the efficacy of an intervention using samples of 20 (Berrymam et al., 2020) and 13 participants (Delaney, 2018) in total. Although the size of the sample may be a methodological limitation, it will be considered in the discussion of the results; in addition to being a preliminary study to carry out a more rigorous study with an RCT. Participants will be eligible if they are between 20 and 45 years old because 77.5% of the reported cases are in this age range in Mexico (CENSIDA, 2022) .
The procedure will be as follows: All participants will be explained what the study consists of, the intervention and will be given informed consent. Patients will be recruited from the Specialized Clinic Condesa Iztapalapa that serves people living with HIV. A brief medical history will begin with an interview to collect medical history (HIV pathological and infectious history such as time of evolution, viral load, CD4 level, ART regimen, as well as substance abuse and cognitive complaints) and then a neuropsychological assessment will be performed. With those candidates who meet the inclusion criteria and wish to participate, will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the intervention group or waiting list control arm. The intervention will begin first with the study group, and a subsequent evaluation will be carried out and then the intervention will be applied to the control group on the waiting list, which will also undergo a subsequent evaluation. Both groups will undergo a third follow-up evaluation three months later to identify whether the changes were maintained over time. Main outcomes of interest include evaluation of the achievement of intervention objectives, usability and acceptability of the CSP. Baseline and follow up measures include assessment of attention, memory, visuospatial skills, working memory, processing speed, verbal fluency, planning, abstraction, depressive and anxiety symptomatology, and daily functionality.
Study Type
Enrollment (Anticipated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Natalia C Cortés, MD
- Phone Number: +52 5529358114
- Email: nat29cc@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Edgar R Landa, PhD
- Email: edgarlandaramirez@comunidad.unam.mx
Study Locations
-
-
Iztapalapa
-
Mexico City, Iztapalapa, Mexico, 09730
- Recruiting
- Condesa Iztapalapa Specialized Clinic
-
Contact:
- Natalia C Cortés, MD
- Phone Number: +52 5529358114
- Email: nat29cc@gmail.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or females with HIV
- Minimum primary education
- From 20 to 45 years old
- Normal or corrected vision and hearing
- Treatment adherence
Exclusion Criteria:
- Neurological and psychiatric history (except mood disorders)
- Head injuries
- Cerebrovascular events
- Substance abuse
- AIDS associated diseases
- Hormonal therapy
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
Experimental: Study group
Refers to the experimental group that will receive the cognitive stimulation program intervention.
|
The cognitive stimulation program consists of 12 sessions of approximately 45 minutes, distributed in a first stage of training and psychoeducation (1 session), a second stage to address emotional aspects of anxiety and depression (2 sessions), and neuropsychological training (8 sessions) and a final closing stage with one session. There will be two sessions per week for 6 weeks. The neuropsychological training includes 20 activities whose level of difficulty will vary according to the number of stimuli and the time of stimuli presentation. It includes 5 attentional activities, 3 memory activities, 5 executive functioning activities, one visuospatial skills activity and 6 ecological activities. These activities will be developed on a digital computer platform where patients will be assigned an identification and password to ensure confidentiality.
Other Names:
|
Other: Waiting list control group
Will be the control group that remains without intervention until the study group completes the cognitive stimulation program and the subsequent neuropsychological assessment has been done.
Once the intervention is completed with the study group, the same program will be applied to the control group.
|
The cognitive stimulation program consists of 12 sessions of approximately 45 minutes, distributed in a first stage of training and psychoeducation (1 session), a second stage to address emotional aspects of anxiety and depression (2 sessions), and neuropsychological training (8 sessions) and a final closing stage with one session. There will be two sessions per week for 6 weeks. The neuropsychological training includes 20 activities whose level of difficulty will vary according to the number of stimuli and the time of stimuli presentation. It includes 5 attentional activities, 3 memory activities, 5 executive functioning activities, one visuospatial skills activity and 6 ecological activities. These activities will be developed on a digital computer platform where patients will be assigned an identification and password to ensure confidentiality.
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Attention
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Direct digits of the Integrated Neuropsychological Exploration Program.
The repetition of a series of digits is requested and an element is added as the task progresses.
Uses percentile scores.
|
Baseline
|
Memory
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Immediate and deferred texts, and word learning of the Integrated Neuropsychological Exploration Program.
Two stories are read and at the end of each one, the patient is asked to narrate everything he/she remembers from the story.
In case of not remembering elements, questions are asked about the missing information.
The stories are asked again after 5 minutes.
Uses percentile scores.
|
Baseline
|
Visuospatial skills
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Rey Figure of the NEUROPSI A&M.
A complex figure is copied from a model.
Afterwards, the figure is drawn again without the model.
Uses scalar scores.
|
Baseline
|
Working memory
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Digits and letters of the Weschler Adults Intelligence Scale IV.
Numbers and letters are provided in disorder and all the elements are asked to be repeated in order, first the numbers and then the letters.
Uses scalar scores.
|
Baseline
|
Processing speed
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Word reading of Stroop test.
A list of 5 columns of words with 20 items each is read as quickly as possible.
Uses percentile scores.
|
Baseline
|
Verbal fluency
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Categorical recall of the Integrated Neuropsychological Exploration Program.
The highest number of animals is said in one minute and the highest number of words beginning with "p" in three minutes.
Uses percentile scores.
|
Baseline
|
Planning
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Zoo test of the Behavioral Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome and Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning for Adults.
Consists in marking a route in a zoo map to visit different places.
Afterwards, the person marks again in the zoo map a rout but is told which route to follow.
|
Baseline
|
Abstraction
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Resemblances of the Weschler Adults Intelligence Scale IV.
Consists in mentioning what two words have in common or how they are similar.
Uses scalar scores.
|
Baseline
|
Attention
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
Direct digits of the Integrated Neuropsychological Exploration Program.
The repetition of a series of digits is requested and an element is added as the task progresses.
Uses percentile scores.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Memory
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
Immediate and deferred texts, and word learning of the Integrated Neuropsychological Exploration Program.
Two stories are read and at the end of each one, the patient is asked to narrate everything he/she remembers from the story.
In case of not remembering elements, questions are asked about the missing information.
The stories are asked again after 5 minutes.
Uses percentile scores.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Visuospatial skills
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
Rey Figure of the NEUROPSI A&M.
A complex figure is copied from a model.
Afterwards, the figure is drawn again without the model.
Uses scalar scores.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Working memory
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
Digits and letters of the Weschler Adults Intelligence Scale IV.
Numbers and letters are provided in disorder and all the elements are asked to be repeated in order, first the numbers and then the letters.
Uses scalar scores.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Processing speed
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
Word reading of Stroop test.
A list of 5 columns of words with 20 items each is read as quickly as possible.
Uses percentile scores.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Verbal fluency
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
Categorical recall of the Integrated Neuropsychological Exploration Program.
The highest number of animals is said in one minute and the highest number of words beginning with "p" in three minutes.
Uses percentile scores.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Planning
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
Zoo test of the Behavioral Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome and Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning for Adults.
Consists in marking a route in a zoo map to visit different places.
Afterwards, the person marks again in the zoo map a rout but is told which route to follow.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Abstraction
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
Resemblances of the Weschler Adults Intelligence Scale IV.
Consists in mentioning what two words have in common or how they are similar.
Uses scalar scores.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Attention
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
Direct digits of the Integrated Neuropsychological Exploration Program.
The repetition of a series of digits is requested and an element is added as the task progresses.
Uses percentile scores.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
Memory
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
Immediate and deferred texts, and word learning of the Integrated Neuropsychological Exploration Program.
Two stories are read and at the end of each one, the patient is asked to narrate everything he/she remembers from the story.
In case of not remembering elements, questions are asked about the missing information.
The stories are asked again after 5 minutes.
Uses percentile scores.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
Visuospatial skills
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
Rey Figure of the NEUROPSI A&M.
A complex figure is copied from a model.
Afterwards, the figure is drawn again without the model.
Uses scalar scores.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
Working memory
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
Digits and letters of the Weschler Adults Intelligence Scale IV.
Numbers and letters are provided in disorder and all the elements are asked to be repeated in order, first the numbers and then the letters.
Uses scalar scores.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
Processing speed
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
Word reading of Stroop test.
A list of 5 columns of words with 20 items each is read as quickly as possible.
Uses percentile scores.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
Verbal fluency
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
Categorical recall of the Integrated Neuropsychological Exploration Program.
The highest number of animals is said in one minute and the highest number of words beginning with "p" in three minutes.
Uses percentile scores.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
Planning
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
Zoo test of the Behavioral Assessment of Dysexecutive Syndrome and Behavioral Rating Inventory of Executive Functioning for Adults.
Consists in marking a route in a zoo map to visit different places.
Afterwards, the person marks again in the zoo map a rout but is told which route to follow.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
Abstraction
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
Resemblances of the Weschler Adults Intelligence Scale IV.
Consists in mentioning what two words have in common or how they are similar.
Uses scalar scores.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9. A self-applied questionnaire that identifies the presence of depressive symptomatology based on a Likert-type scale of 9 items.
Based on the cut-off points, minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderate to severe (15-19) and severe (20-27) depression can be identified.
|
Baseline
|
Anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: Baseline
|
General Anxiety Disorder - 7. A self-applied scale to identify generalized anxiety.
It consists of a self-applied questionnaire of seven Likert-type questions.
Based on the cut-off points, no anxiety (0-4), mild anxiety symptoms (5-9), moderate anxiety symptoms (10-14) and severe anxiety symptoms (15-21) can be identified.
|
Baseline
|
Daily functionality
Time Frame: Baseline
|
The Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire.
This instrument evaluates daily functioning by assessing basic and instrumental activities in six areas (self-care, home activities, work, recreation, money management, travel and communication, and information technology); it is usually useful for patients with mild cognitive or motor limitations.
It allows to generate a percentage of functional impairment by adding the scores of each item among the total number of responses per 100.
|
Baseline
|
Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9. A self-applied questionnaire that identifies the presence of depressive symptomatology based on a Likert-type scale of 9 items.
Based on the cut-off points, minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderate to severe (15-19) and severe (20-27) depression can be identified.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
General Anxiety Disorder - 7. A self-applied scale to identify generalized anxiety.
It consists of a self-applied questionnaire of seven Likert-type questions.
Based on the cut-off points, no anxiety (0-4), mild anxiety symptoms (5-9), moderate anxiety symptoms (10-14) and severe anxiety symptoms (15-21) can be identified.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Daily functionality
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
The Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire.
This instrument evaluates daily functioning by assessing basic and instrumental activities in six areas (self-care, home activities, work, recreation, money management, travel and communication, and information technology); it is usually useful for patients with mild cognitive or motor limitations.
It allows to generate a percentage of functional impairment by adding the scores of each item among the total number of responses per 100.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
Patient Health Questionnaire - 9. A self-applied questionnaire that identifies the presence of depressive symptomatology based on a Likert-type scale of 9 items.
Based on the cut-off points, minimal (0-4), mild (5-9), moderate (10-14), moderate to severe (15-19) and severe (20-27) depression can be identified.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
Anxiety symptoms
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
General Anxiety Disorder - 7. A self-applied scale to identify generalized anxiety.
It consists of a self-applied questionnaire of seven Likert-type questions.
Based on the cut-off points, no anxiety (0-4), mild anxiety symptoms (5-9), moderate anxiety symptoms (10-14) and severe anxiety symptoms (15-21) can be identified.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
Daily functionality
Time Frame: Up to 12 weeks
|
The Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire.
This instrument evaluates daily functioning by assessing basic and instrumental activities in six areas (self-care, home activities, work, recreation, money management, travel and communication, and information technology); it is usually useful for patients with mild cognitive or motor limitations.
It allows to generate a percentage of functional impairment by adding the scores of each item among the total number of responses per 100.
|
Up to 12 weeks
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Evaluation of the achievement of intervention objectives
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Goal Assessment Scale.
Mathematical technique that identifies the achievement of objectives in a rehabilitation program based on the perception of the patient and/or family member.
Each objective is measured on a 5-point scale ranging from -2 to +2 (very little, little, expected level, more than expected, much more than expected).
|
Baseline
|
Evaluation of the usability of the cognitive stimulation program
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
System usability scale.
A 5-level Likert-type scale (strongly disagree to strongly agree) that evaluates the opinion of the participants regarding the usability of digital systems.
A maximum total score of 100 is obtained by averaging each response from all questionnaires.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Evaluation of the acceptability of the cognitive stimulation program
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
In the last session of the intervention, a qualitative interview will be conducted with the participants.
The interview will include questions associated with the relevance, usefulness, acceptability and satisfaction of the cognitive stimulation program.
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Evaluation of the achievement of intervention objectives
Time Frame: Immediately after the intervention
|
Goal Assessment Scale.
Mathematical technique that identifies the achievement of objectives in a rehabilitation program based on the perception of the patient and/or family member.
Each objective is measured on a 5-point scale ranging from -2 to +2 (very little, little, expected level, more than expected, much more than expected).
|
Immediately after the intervention
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Natalia C Cortés, MD, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
- Study Chair: Ma Guillermina T Yáñez, PhD, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
- Study Chair: Dulce María Bélen C Prieto, PhD, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
- Study Chair: Edgar R Landa, PhD, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico
- Study Chair: Juan C Castillo, PhD, National Polythecnic Institute
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Lancaster GA, Dodd S, Williamson PR. Design and analysis of pilot studies: recommendations for good practice. J Eval Clin Pract. 2004 May;10(2):307-12. doi: 10.1111/j..2002.384.doc.x.
- Weber E, Blackstone K, Woods SP. Cognitive neurorehabilitation of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorders: a qualitative review and call to action. Neuropsychol Rev. 2013 Mar;23(1):81-98. doi: 10.1007/s11065-013-9225-6. Epub 2013 Feb 16.
- Vance DE, Fazeli PL, Ross LA, Wadley VG, Ball KK. Speed of processing training with middle-age and older adults with HIV: a pilot study. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2012 Nov-Dec;23(6):500-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2012.01.005. Epub 2012 May 11.
- Becker JT, Dew MA, Aizenstein HJ, Lopez OL, Morrow L, Saxton J, Tarraga L. A pilot study of the effects of internet-based cognitive stimulation on neuropsychological function in HIV disease. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(21):1848-52. doi: 10.3109/09638288.2012.667188. Epub 2012 Mar 30.
- Bilder RM, Postal KS, Barisa M, Aase DM, Cullum CM, Gillaspy SR, Harder L, Kanter G, Lanca M, Lechuga DM, Morgan JM, Most R, Puente AE, Salinas CM, Woodhouse J. InterOrganizational practice committee recommendations/guidance for teleneuropsychology (TeleNP) in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Clin Neuropsychol. 2020 Oct-Nov;34(7-8):1314-1334. doi: 10.1080/13854046.2020.1767214. Epub 2020 Jul 16.
- Boivin MJ, Busman RA, Parikh SM, Bangirana P, Page CF, Opoka RO, Giordani B. A pilot study of the neuropsychological benefits of computerized cognitive rehabilitation in Ugandan children with HIV. Neuropsychology. 2010 Sep;24(5):667-73. doi: 10.1037/a0019312.
- Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharmaceutical Statistics. 2005; 4: 287e91.
- Berryman A, Rasavage K, Politzer T, Gerber D. Oculomotor Treatment in Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2020 Jan/Feb;74(1):7401185050p1-7401185050p7. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2020.026880.
- Delaney MC. Caring for the caregivers: Evaluation of the effect of an eight-week pilot mindful self-compassion (MSC) training program on nurses' compassion fatigue and resilience. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 21;13(11):e0207261. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0207261. eCollection 2018.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
Study Completion (Anticipated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Mental Disorders
- Brain Diseases
- Central Nervous System Diseases
- Nervous System Diseases
- RNA Virus Infections
- Virus Diseases
- Infections
- Blood-Borne Infections
- Communicable Diseases
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases, Viral
- Sexually Transmitted Diseases
- Lentivirus Infections
- Retroviridae Infections
- Immunologic Deficiency Syndromes
- Immune System Diseases
- Neurocognitive Disorders
- Dementia
- HIV Infections
- AIDS Dementia Complex
Other Study ID Numbers
- TNSP
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Telerehabilitation
-
University of WyomingUnknown
-
Université de SherbrookeCanadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)Recruiting
-
Uskudar UniversityIstanbul University - Cerrahpasa (IUC)CompletedTelerehabilitationTurkey
-
Pamukkale UniversityRecruitingTelerehabilitation | Knee Arthroplasty, TotalTurkey
-
Garyfallia PeperaNot yet recruitingCardiovascular Diseases | Telerehabilitation | Cardiac RehabilitationGreece
-
University of RzeszowCompletedTelerehabilitation | Total Knee Arthoplasty | PhysiotherapyPoland
-
Mehmet KurtaranEnrolling by invitationAmputation | Exercise | Telerehabilitation | Prosthesis UserTurkey
-
Saglik Bilimleri UniversitesiUnknownTelerehabilitation | COPDTurkey
-
Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusCentro Riabilitativo Villa Beretta; Fondazione Opera S CamilloCompletedNervous System Diseases | Rehabilitation | Telerehabilitation | TechnologyItaly
-
University Hospital, GhentUniversity GhentRecruitingSHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY | REHABILITATION | TELEREHABILITATIONBelgium
Clinical Trials on Cognitive stimulation program
-
Badalona Serveis AssistencialsPublic Health Agency of Barcelona; Reality Telling SLCompletedCognitive Dysfunction | Mild Cognitive ImpairmentSpain
-
Escola Superior de Enfermagem de CoimbraGrouping of Health Centers of Greater Porto I - Santo Tirso/Trofa; Group of...UnknownNeurocognitive Disorders | DementiaPortugal
-
Queen's UniversityBaycrestCompletedGeriatric Disorder | Age-Related Memory Disorders | Impaired Cognition | Learning Disorders | Impairment of AttentionCanada
-
University Hospital, AngersNot yet recruitingDysexecutive Mild Cognitive ImpairmentFrance
-
Universidad de ZaragozaNot yet recruitingCognitive Dysfunction | Mild Cognitive Impairment
-
University of BarcelonaMinisterio de Economía y Competitividad, SpainCompleted
-
heba ahmed khalifaActive, not recruitingDiabetic Peripheral NeuropathyEgypt
-
NYU Langone HealthWithdrawnMultiple Sclerosis
-
NYU Langone HealthStony Brook UniversityCompleted
-
Washington University School of MedicineNational Institutes of Health (NIH)Completed