Pain Intensity After RObotic Assisted Urological Surgery (PAIROU)

Pain Intensity After RObotic Assisted Urological Surgery: the PAIROU Study

Postoperative pain remains a widespread but still underestimated problem. Studies have shown that despite improvements in pain management, many patients still suffer from moderate to severe postoperative pain. Severe pain is associated with decreased patient satisfaction, delayed postoperative ambulation, prolonged length of stay, risk of developing chronic postoperative pain, and increased morbidity and mortality. Therefore, it is of great importance that surgical procedures that result in severe pain and the optimal analgesic strategies for these procedures can be identified. Most recommendations on postoperative pain management (prevention and treatment) are not procedure-specific. However, risk factors for postoperative pain depend on the patient and the procedure.

In order to develop procedure-specific postoperative pain management guidelines, pain must be assessed in a procedure-specific manner. Additionally, data is sparse on relatively new procedures like robotic surgery. A study, Harel et al. compared pain intensities after ureteral reimplantation with robotic or open surgery in children and reported lower pain scores after robotic surgery. This single study reinforces the clinical findings that robotic surgery is associated with less pain. However, pain assessment after robotic urologic surgery has not been evaluated before.

In order to add to the evaluation of postoperative pain in different surgical groups, we wish to evaluate pain intensities after robot-assisted urological surgery. In this cohort study, we seek to provide an estimate of the pain intensities that can be expected after most types of robot-assisted urological surgery in relation to analgesic treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

968

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brussel, Belgium, 1000
        • CHU St Pierre - Bruxelles
      • Amiens, France, 80090
        • Clinique Victor Pauchet
      • Angers, France, 49044
        • Clinique de l'Anjou
      • Arras, France, 62000
        • Hopital Privé Arras les Bonnettes
      • Auxerre, France, 89000
        • Polyclinique Sainte Marguerite - Institut d'Urologie- Auxerre
      • Beaumont, France, 63110
        • Hôpital Privé de la Châtaigneraie - Beaumont
      • Besançon, France, 25000
        • Clinique Saint Vincent
      • Bourg-en-Bresse, France, 01012
        • CH de Bourg en Bresse
      • Brive-la-Gaillarde, France, 19100
        • Centre Hospitalier Dubois - Brive la Gaillarde
      • Dax, France, 40100
        • CH de Dax
      • La Tronche, France, 38700
        • Chu Grenoble Alpes
      • Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France, 94270
        • Hôpital Bicêtre - APHP
      • Lille, France, 59037
        • Hôpital Huriez - CHU de Lille
      • Lille, France, 54900
        • Groupement des Hôpitaux de l'Institut Catholique de Lille
      • Lyon, France, 69003
        • Hôpital Edouard Herriot (HCL - Lyon)
      • Lyon, France, 69007
        • CH Saint Joseph Saint Luc
      • Lyon, France, 69008
        • Hôpital Privé Jean Mermoz - Lyon
      • Marseille, France, 13015
        • Hôpital Nord de Marseille
      • Marseille, France, 13005
        • CHU Conception - Marseille
      • Mont-de-Marsan, France, 40024
        • CH de Mont-de-Marsan
      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • CHU de Nantes
      • Neuilly-sur-Seine, France, 92200
        • GH Privé Ambroise Paré - Hartmann
      • Nîmes, France, 30900
        • CHU de Nimes-Hôpital Carémeau
      • Orléans, France, 45067
        • CHR Orléans
      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Hôpital Saint-Louis - APHP
      • Paris, France, 75020
        • Hôpital Tenon - APHP
      • Paris, France, 75018
        • Hôpital Bichat - APHP
      • Paris, France, 75013
        • AP-HP - Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière - APHP
      • Perpignan, France, 66000
        • CH Perpignan
      • Pointe À Pitre, France, 97159
        • CHU Guadeloupe
      • Rennes, France, 35033
        • CHU de Rennes
      • Rouen, France, 76000
        • CHU de Rouen
      • Saint-Denis, France, 97400
        • CHU Réunion (site Nord)
      • Saintes, France, 17100
        • CH de Saintonge
      • Seclin, France, 59113
        • CH de Seclin
      • Sens, France, 89100
        • CH de Sens
      • Soyaux, France, 16800
        • Centre Clinical - Soyaux
      • Strasbourg, France, 67000
        • Clinique Sainte Anne
      • Strasbourg, France, 67000
        • Clinique Rhena - Strasbourg
      • Suresnes, France, 92150
        • Hôpital Foch
      • Toulon, France, 83100
        • Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Toulon-La Seyne sur Mer
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
        • CHU Toulouse - Hôpital Rangueil
      • Valenciennes, France, 59300
        • Ch de Valenciennes
      • Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, France, 54500
        • CHRU de Nancy
      • Madrid, Spain, 28040
        • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
      • Madrid, Spain, 28025
        • Hospital Universitario La Zarzuela

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients with planned robot-assisted urological surgery.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > or = 18 years old
  • Programmed robot-assisted urological surgery
  • Patient who did not declare any opposition to participating in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Urgent surgery
  • Impossibility of communicating in French
  • Cognitive deficit
  • Adults legally protected or deprived of liberty

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Robot-assisted urological surgery
Patients with programmed robot-assisted urological surgery
Patient with programmed robot-assisted urological surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain level on D1 of surgery
Time Frame: Day 1 after surgery
Measurement of pain intensity on D1 of surgery, assessed with a simple numerical scale (ENS). Scores range from 0-10 points, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
Day 1 after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain intensity (NRS) at rest and during exercise
Time Frame: Second day after surgery
Pain intensity on the second day after surgery (NRS) at rest and during exercise. Pain intensity assessed with a simple numerical scale (ENS). Scores range from 0-10 points, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
Second day after surgery
Highest pain score at rest and during exercise
Time Frame: In the first 48 hours
Highest pain score in the first 48 hours at rest and during exercise. Pain intensity assessed with a simple numerical scale (ENS). Scores range from 0-10 points, with higher scores indicating greater pain intensity.
In the first 48 hours
Presence of side effect: Nausea and vomiting
Time Frame: In the first 48 hours
Patient presenting or not nausea and vomiting in the first 48 hours
In the first 48 hours
Time of the first ambulation
Time Frame: Time of the first ambulation during hospitalization
Time from robotic assisted urological surgery to the first ambulation
Time of the first ambulation during hospitalization
Date and time of resumption of transit
Time Frame: Date and time of resumption of transit
number of days between robotic assisted urological surgery and resumption of transit
Date and time of resumption of transit
Consumption of morphine
Time Frame: During the 48 hours after surgery
Consumption of morphine (or equivalent (see morphine equivalent table)) in mg 48 hours after surgery
During the 48 hours after surgery
Duration of surgery
Time Frame: Duration of surgery
Duration of surgery: time between the begining of the robotic assisted urological surgery and the end of surgery.
Duration of surgery
Operator experience for the robotic assisted urological surgery
Time Frame: Operator experience is the number of years from the first robotic assisted urological surgery performed by the operator until the surgery of the patient included in this study.
Operator experience for the robotic assisted urological surgery, classified in 3 ranges: less than 5 years; between 5 and 10 years; more than 10 years
Operator experience is the number of years from the first robotic assisted urological surgery performed by the operator until the surgery of the patient included in this study.
Complications
Time Frame: Period is defined from the day of robotic assisted urological surgery until the end of hospitalisation
Complications according to the Dindo and Clavien classification
Period is defined from the day of robotic assisted urological surgery until the end of hospitalisation
Length of stay
Time Frame: From the first day of hospitalization to the last day of hospitalization
Length of stay at hospital (number of days)
From the first day of hospitalization to the last day of hospitalization

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Hélène BELOEIL, MD, Teaching Hospital of Rennes, France

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 7, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

July 7, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 10, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 12, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 21, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 20, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • PAIROU 2022-04

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Robot-assisted Urological Surgery

Clinical Trials on Robot-assisted urological surgery

Subscribe