Collagen Matrix + rhPDGF-BB vs Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Dehiscences

April 8, 2025 updated by: Lorenzo Tavelli, Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)

Xenogeneic Collagen Matrix Loaded With rhPDGF-BB vs Autogenous Connective Tissue Graft for the Treatment of Peri-implant Soft Tissue Dehiscences: A Randomized, Controlled, Clinical, Trial

The study aims at comparing two different approaches for the treatment of implant esthetic complications (peri-implant soft tissue dehiscences): autogenous connective tissue graft vs collagen matrix + recombinant human platelet derived growth factor-BB

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The present randomized clinical trial aims at investigating two approaches (autogenous connective tissue graft vs collagen matrix + recombinant human platelet derived growth factor-BB) when performed in combination with the prosthetic-surgical approach for the treatment of peri-implant soft tissue dehiscences. Clinical, volumetric, ultrasonographic and patient-reported outcomes will be evaluated at different time points up to 1 year.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02115
        • Harvard School of Dental Medicine

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years,
  • Periodontally and systemically healthy,
  • Full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score ≤ 20% (measured at four sites per tooth), iv) Presence of single dental implant in the anterior area (from the first right premolar to the first left premolar) showing a PSTD, with the subjects searching for treatment of this condition,
  • Peri-implant papillae not flat (PSTD subclass a or b) (Zucchelli et al., 2019), vi) Implants diagnosed as healthy (Berglundh et al., 2018),
  • Ability to perform good oral hygiene

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications for surgery,
  • Systemic condition (e.g. diabetes mellitus, HIV, cancer, etc) that could compromise wound healing,
  • Patients pregnant or attempting to get pregnant (self-reported),
  • Untreated periodontitis,
  • Untreated peri-implant mucositis or peri-implantitis (Berglundh et al., 2018),
  • Smoking, defined as self-reported daily habit. Occasional smokers won't be excluded,
  • History of soft tissue grafting at the implant site showing PSTD within the last 6 months.

Indications for surgical intervention will be established based on patient's esthetic demands and peri-implant soft tissue phenotype.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Connective tissue graft
Autogenous connective tissue graft harvested from the palate as a free gingival graft and then de-epithelialized
Coronally advanced flap with an autogenous graft (CTG)
Experimental: Collagen matrix + rhPDGF-BB
Xenogeneic cross-linked collagen matrix + recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB
Coronally advanced flap with a graft substitute (collagen matrix and rhPDGF-BB)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Soft tissue dehiscence reduction
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Reduction of the depth of the Soft tissue dehiscence (vertical measurement of the complication, in relation to the level of the cemento-enamel junction of the contralateral homologous tooth) compared to baseline (expressed in millimeters)
6 and 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Complete peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence (PSTD) coverage
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Percentage of cases with complete resolution of the implant esthetic complication (expressed as a percentage)
6 and 12 months
mean peri-implant soft tissue dehiscence (PSTD) coverage
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Percentage of coverage of the soft tissue dehiscence compared to baseline, measured with a formula considering final PSTD depth and initial PSTD depth (expressed as a percentage)
6 and 12 months
Mucosal thickness changes
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes within the mucosal thickness measured with ultrasonography (expressed in mm)
3, 6 and 12 months
3D Volumetric changes
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes within the buccal contour measured by superimposing digital impressions obtained with optical scanning (expressed in mm^3)
3, 6 and 12 months
Post-operative pain
Time Frame: 14 days after the surgery
Patient-reported pain after the surgical procedure (expressed with a 0-10 visual analogue scale [VAS])
14 days after the surgery
Professional esthetic assessment
Time Frame: 12 months
Esthetic outcomes of the treatment assessed by a calibrated operator using the Implant soft tissue Dehiscence coverage Esthetic Score (IDES) (expressed using points, based on the IDES classification system from Zucchelli et al. 2021)
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lorenzo Tavelli, DDS, MS, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, USA

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 4, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 20, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 21, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 8, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 13, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2025

Last Verified

April 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Delta IMPL REC (IRB22-0637)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Implant Complication

Clinical Trials on Prosthetic-surgical approach + autogenous graft

Subscribe