Rehabilitation of Single Aesthetic Areas Using Narrow Diameter Implants (IDR)

Rehabilitation of Single Aesthetic Areas Using Narrow Diameter Implants With Computer Guided Implant Insertion: a Prospective Study

The scientific literature does not provide scientific evidence on how to manage patients suffering from monoedentulism with ridges having a reduced bone thickness or a reduced mesio-distal space. Narrow diameter implants could be a solution to rehabilitate patients suffering from these clinical conditions while avoiding longer, more complex and sometimes even multidisciplinary therapies. However, there is a lack of clinical studies analyzing the outcomes of rehabilitation with narrow diameter implants.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Dental implants are considered a predictable rehabilitation option in the event of tooth extraction or missing tooth. In some cases, the inevitable resorption of the alveolar ridge after tooth extraction can make the insertion of dental implants difficult or even impossible without the use of more advanced bone regeneration procedures. Narrow diameter implants represent an alternative treatment option in areas with limited ridge width. Narrow alveolar ridges and limited interdental or inter-implant spaces continue to pose a challenge to the clinician. In the case of a narrow ridge, two options are available: the first option is to insert a standard diameter implant following bone augmentation procedures; the second option is to use an implant with a narrow diameter. Regarding the mesio-distal gap, an adequate distance between teeth and implants is necessary to reduce subsequent bone resorption and recession of the papillae. Difficult clinical situations with limited mesio-distal space or reduced ridge width can be overcome by using narrow diameter implants. Correct three-dimensional implant positioning is the key factor to obtain, in addition to good integration, favorable prosthetic results and a good long-term aesthetic result. To optimize the insertion of the implants, reducing the intrinsic imprecision of the conventional free-hand technique, computer-guided static surgery protocols can be used to plan the angulation, position and depth of the implant with a digital software. Narrow diameter implants therefore have their own indication for the replacement of lateral incisors of the maxilla and for the incisors of the mandible.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

17

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Roma
      • Rome, Roma, Italy, 00168
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients aged >18 years, in good general health, who have undergone implant rehabilitation of single edentulism in the anterior region will be selected.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have undergone implant surgery to perform implant rehabilitation of single edentulism in the anterior region to insert a reduced diameter implant;

    • ASA I and ASA II patients;
    • Age > 18yr;
    • Non-smokers or smokers ≤ 5 cig/day;
    • Achievement of FMPS and FMBS ≤ 15%;
    • Signing of the written informed consent to participate in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe general medical pathologies;

    • Immunodeficiency states;
    • Radiotherapy in the head and neck region;
    • Uncontrolled diabetes or hypertension;
    • Smokers >5 cigs/day;
    • Impossibility to carry out homogeneous and continuous follow-up;
    • Documented allergy to the biomaterials used;
    • Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
    • Inability to provide written informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
narrow diameter implant
Patients who have performed computer-guided implant surgery for the rehabilitation of single edentulism in the anterior region with lack of adequate bone thickness or mesio-distal space using implants with narrow diameter.
Rehabilitation of single edentulism in the anterior region with narrow diameter implants and computer guided surgery.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
peri-implant marginal bone loss in millimeters
Time Frame: 12 months from implant placement
evaluation of the peri-implant marginal bone loss in millimeters
12 months from implant placement

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
soft tissue evaluation in millimeters
Time Frame: 12 months from implant placement
evaluation of marginal soft tissues levels in millimeters
12 months from implant placement
biological complication rate in percentage
Time Frame: 12 months from implant placement
evaluation of biological complications in percentage
12 months from implant placement
esthetics
Time Frame: 12 months from implant placement
evaluation of the esthetics using the PES score
12 months from implant placement
mechanical complication rate in percentage
Time Frame: 12 months from implant placement
evaluation of mechanical complications in percentage
12 months from implant placement

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Paolo Francesco Manicone, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2025

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 8, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 26, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

July 30, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 8, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 7, 2026

Last Verified

July 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 6683

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Implant Complication

Clinical Trials on narrow diameter implant

Subscribe