Rehabilitation for Functional Memory Symptoms After Concussion

December 3, 2024 updated by: Noah Silverberg, University of British Columbia

Feasibility of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy for Functional Memory Symptoms After Concussion

This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of novel cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-based intervention designed to improve functional memory symptoms after concussion. Participants will be randomized to CBT or an attention-matched control intervention (cognitive rehabilitation). The primary outcomes for this trial are feasibility metrics, including recruitment, patient-perceived credibility of treatment, patient adherence to treatment, therapists' compliance with the treatment protocol, and retention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Background: Although objectively measurable memory impairments typically resolve within weeks after sustaining a concussion, many people continue to perceive memory problems one year later. There are no known effective treatments for this condition. A promising new approach may be to target psychological mechanisms that perpetuate excessively negative perceptions of memory ability.

Methods: A pilot randomized controlled trial to evaluate the feasibility of a new cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)-based treatment program specifically designed to improve persistent memory complaints after concussion. The main inclusion criteria will be (i) concussion in the past 6 to 24 months, (ii) research diagnosis of Functional Cognitive Disorder. Participants will be randomized (1:1) into one of two groups: CBT or cognitive rehabilitation. Individuals in both groups will participate in 11 x 50-minute sessions delivered over Zoom videoconference, co-facilitated by clinical psychology graduate students under the supervision of a registered clinical psychologist.

Aims: To evaluate the feasibility and potential efficacy of CBT for functional memory symptoms after concussion.

Approach: Prespecified feasibility criteria on recruitment, patient-perceived credibility of treatment, patient adherence to treatment, therapists' compliance with the treatment protocol, and retention will determine the success of the pilot trial. The investigators further hypothesize that CBT will be associated with greater reductions in memory concern compared to the control intervention.

Implications: The results of this pilot study will inform a larger, more definitive clinical trial focused on testing efficacy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • British Columbia
      • North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V7L 1A5
        • Urgent and Primary Care Center: North Vancouver
      • North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V7L 2L7
        • Lion's Gate Hosital
      • Richmond, British Columbia, Canada, V6X 1A2
        • Richmond Hospital
      • Surrey, British Columbia, Canada, V3W 5A8
        • Back in Motion (Post-Concussion Management Program)
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 1Y6
        • St. Paul's Hospital
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1M9
        • Vancouver General Hospital
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6T 2B5
        • University of British Columbia Hospital
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5T 3N4
        • Mount Saint Joseph's Hospital
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 0A3
        • Urgent and Primary Care Center: City Center
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6B 6C1
        • Lifemark (Post-Concussion Management Program)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 18-65 years old
  • Fluent in English
  • Have regular access to the internet
  • Sustained a concussion according to the World Health Organization Neurotrauma Task Force definition between 6 and 24 months ago
  • Meet diagnostic criteria for Functional Cognitive Disorder

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Performance validity test failure
  • Unstable/serious medical condition (e.g., cancer, multiple sclerosis, etc.),
  • Unstable severe/mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia requiring hospital admission in the past year)
  • Probable alcohol or drug use disorder
  • Taking a medication with a known side effect of memory impairment (e.g., benzodiazepines, opiates, or topiramate)
  • Contraindication(s) for MRI

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)
11 weekly sessions of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) delivered over videoconference
Cognitive behavioural therapy for functional memory symptoms after concussion is delivered by a psychologist over 11 individual (1:1) secure videoconference sessions. The core active ingredients are 1) Behavioural experiments, which acts by phasing out compensatory strategies in order to increase normal memory use and 2) Cognitive reappraisal, which aids in re-interpreting memory lapses in order to reduce reactivity to them.
Active Comparator: Cognitive Rehabilitation
11 weekly sessions of traditional cognitive rehabilitation delivered over videoconference
Training and practice with external memory aids/compensatory strategies, adapted from Shum et al. (2011). J Rehabil Med, 43(3):216-223.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment
Time Frame: Week 0
>50% of eligible participants agree to enroll
Week 0
Treatment credibility
Time Frame: Week 2
>50% of enrolled participants rate the intervention as above midpoint on credibility
Week 2
Patient adherence
Time Frame: Week 12
>70% of participants attend at least 8 sessions
Week 12
Therapists compliance
Time Frame: Week 12
Therapists cover 95% of essential element content
Week 12
Retention
Time Frame: Week 12
>80% of randomized participants complete the primary outcome measure immediately post-intervention
Week 12
Memory concern
Time Frame: Week 12
Satisfaction subscale of the Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire [range=0-72; higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with memory]
Week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Avoidance
Time Frame: Week 12
Fear-Avoidance of Memory Loss Scale [range=5-25; higher scores indicate greater fear and avoidance]
Week 12
Reliance on others
Time Frame: Week 12
Relative subscale of the Memory Compensation Questionnaire [range=0-115; higher scores indicate greater dependence on others to remember things]
Week 12
Catastrophizing
Time Frame: Week 12
Adapted Pain Catastrophizing Scale [range=0-52, higher scores indicate greater catastrophizing]
Week 12
Patient Global Impression of Change
Time Frame: Week 12
Single item rated on a scale of 1 (much worse) to 5 (much better) since the start of treatment
Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Noah Silverberg, PhD, University of British Columbia

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 29, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2023

Study Completion (Actual)

November 30, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 22, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 17, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

December 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 3, 2024

Last Verified

December 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Upon reasonable request

IPD Sharing Time Frame

12 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Defined research question approved by the principal investigator

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • ICF

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury

Clinical Trials on Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT)

Subscribe