Evaluating a Novel Method of EEG Evoked Response Potential Analysis in Concussion Assessment

September 26, 2018 updated by: ElMindA Ltd

Evaluating a Novel Method of EEG Evoked Response Potential Analysis in Concussion Assessment - A GE Healthcare Companion Study: Advanced MRI Applications for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Phase 2 (mTBI-phase2)

mTBI is widely recognized as a major public health concern in the United States and worldwide. mTBI diagnosis remains a clinical challenge as no single test can diagnose every concussion. Recent advances in EEG evoked response potential analysis have led to a novel technique for assessing brain network activation (BNA) patterns. This study purpose is to study this BNA technology in individuals who have sustained a concussion.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), also known as concussion, occurs commonly in sport and Motor Vehicle accidents. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention estimate that as many as 3.8 million sport-related concussions occur annually in the United States. Despite ongoing research, there is no highly sensitive clinical test for cognitive function that can be rapidly applied in a sporting environment. This makes the clinical diagnosis of concussion particularly difficult, as the clinical presentation of concussion is highly variable with symptoms often evolving over time. Furthermore, with less than 10% of concussions resulting in loss of consciousness, self-reported symptom presence may be the only initial evidence of a concussion. These factors make concussion a challenging injury to diagnose. Given the variability in concussion presentations, there is no single test that can diagnose a concussion.

ElMindA, the sponsor of this study, has developed a novel method to automatically reveal functional networks of brain activity based on analysis of EEG Event Related Potential (ERP) data. This technological platform is capable of providing new metrics of brain function that can assist in patient evaluation and management. The analysis is done in two separate processes that are entirely separate and are performed independently of one another. Reference Brain Network Models of EEG data were recorded and analyzed from several groups of subjects to establish a set of group patterns that characterized the brain network activity of the group. EEG data from a single subject are processed to enable subject evaluation, as compared to the established group patterns. This individual analysis is the basis of the BNA scores computed for an individual subject.

Therefore, this investigation is designed to evaluate the clinical utility of ElMindA's BNA scores in detecting and managing concussive injuries.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

46

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
        • Hospital for Special surery
    • Pennsylvania
      • Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213
        • University of Pittsburgh

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 50 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adolescents, young adults and adults of both genders, enrolled in Advanced MRI Applications for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Phase 2 (mTBI-phase2) Age range: 15-50 years

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Enrolled in Arm 1 -mTBI group in the GE study: Advanced MRI Applications for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Phase 2 study
  • Enrolled in Arm 2 -non TBI group in the GE study: Advanced MRI Applications for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Phase 2 study
  • Males and females Aged 15-50
  • Willingness to participate in the companion study and the ability to give informed assent (for children) and/or consent (for the parent of a minor or adults aged 18 years of age or older for themselves).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Hair types which might preclude appropriate scalp electrode cap fit. E.g: dread locks, corn rows etc.
  • Significant sensory deficit e.g.: Deafness, and/or blindness
  • Open scalp wound
  • Active head lice infection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Subjects enrolled in the GE healthcare study: Advanced MRI Applications for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Phase 2 (mTBI-phase 2), mTBI (Mild Traumatic Brain Injury) patient group also called as Arm 1 in this study.
Non Mild Traumatic Brain Injury
Subjects enrolled in the GE healthcare study, Advanced MRI Applications for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury-Phase 2 (mTBI-phase 2), non-TBI (Non Mild Traumatic Brain Injury) patients also called as Arm 2 in this study.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assess the BNA database for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Non Mild Traumatic Brain Injury population.
Time Frame: This study duration is 12 months
Functional networks of brain activity is measured using analysis of EEG Event Related Potential (ERP) data. Clinical assessments battery will be utilized in order to examine different sets of BNA database for Mild Traumatic Brain Injury and Non Mild Traumatic Brain Injury population.
This study duration is 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 26, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 16, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

January 16, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 20, 2017

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 27, 2017

First Posted (Actual)

August 29, 2017

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 27, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 26, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)

3
Subscribe