New 3D Printed Wrist Orthosis

July 10, 2023 updated by: TOPMED

Development and Validation of a New Wrist Orthosis by 3D Printing

In order to offer a new product improving the healing and/or rehabilitation of injuries or injuries to the wrist and hand, Médicus is seeking to develop a new orthosis for the wrist and hand by 3D printing. This project will focus on the development of an orthosis related to carpal tunnel syndrome as well as droopy hand. Among the issues to be addressed in this development proposal, the investigators find: 1) Identification of the best methodology for taking digital impressions; design of an orthosis with the following characteristics: (i) no external attachment system, (ii) spiral design with a thumb ring, (iii) manufacturing by 3D printing and (iv) a cost of less than $150 ;3) Performing technical and clinical trials.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Québec, Quebec, Canada, G1S1C1

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be between 18 and 70 years old
  • Ability to accurately communicate comfort and discomfort,
  • Carpal tunnel syndrome, or
  • de Quervain's tenosynovitis, or
  • Drop hand, or
  • Ulnar nerve damage
  • Rhizarthrosis, or
  • Tendinopathy of the thumb
  • And/or ulnar gale

Exclusion Criteria:

  • - Spasticity in the upper limbs
  • Paralysis, Insensitivity of the upper limbs
  • Neuromuscular pathology affecting the upper limbs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Thumb then wrist orthosis
Custom 3D printed thumb and wrist orthosis
Experimental: Wrist then thumb orthosis
Custom 3D printed thumb and wrist orthosis

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in pain during treatment from baseline at day 14
Time Frame: Baseline and day 14
Pain measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (no pain) to 5 (worst possible pain). Change = (Day 14 score - baseline score)
Baseline and day 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Difficulty in donning the orthosis
Time Frame: Each day during 2 weeks of intervention
Yes/No question about having difficulty putting on the orthosis. No unit.
Each day during 2 weeks of intervention
Comfort
Time Frame: Each day during 2 weeks of intervention
Comfort measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (worst possible comfort) to 5 (best possible comfort). No unit.
Each day during 2 weeks of intervention
Weight satisfaction rating at baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
Weight satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Baseline
Satisfaction on ease of donning
Time Frame: Baseline
Satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating on ease of donning, possible scores range from 1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Baseline
Satisfaction on ease of donning
Time Frame: Day 14 of intervention
Satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating on ease of donning, possible scores range from 1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Day 14 of intervention
Satisfaction on ease of doffing
Time Frame: Baseline
Satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating on ease of doffing, possible scores range from 1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Baseline
Satisfaction on ease of doffing
Time Frame: Day 14 of intervention
Satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating on ease of doffing, possible scores range from 1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Day 14 of intervention
Functional disability evaluation of the upper member
Time Frame: Baseline
Evaluation of disability of arm, shoulder and hand in activities of daily living via Quick Disability of arm, shoulder and hand (Quick DASH) (validated 11 elements 5-point rating). Possible scores range from 1 (No difficulty) to 5 (Incapacity to complete task). No unit.
Baseline
Functional disability evaluation of the upper member
Time Frame: Day 14 of intervention
Evaluation of disability of arm, shoulder and hand in activities of daily living via Quick Disability of arm, shoulder and hand (Quick DASH) (validated 11 elements 5-point rating). Possible scores range from 1 (No difficulty) to 5 (Incapacity to complete task). No unit.
Day 14 of intervention
Weight satisfaction rating at day 14 of intervention
Time Frame: Day 14 of intervention
Weight satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Day 14 of intervention
aesthetic satisfaction rating at day 14 of intervention
Time Frame: Day 14 of intervention
Aesthetic satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Day 14 of intervention
aesthetic satisfaction rating at baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
Aesthetic satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Baseline
material quality satisfaction rating at baseline
Time Frame: Baseline
Material quality satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Baseline
material quality satisfaction rating at day 14 of intervention
Time Frame: Day 14 of intervention
Material quality satisfaction measure via 1-5 rating, possible scores range from1 (worst possible satisfaction) to 5 (best possible satisfaction). No unit.
Day 14 of intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 2, 2022

Primary Completion (Estimated)

May 24, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 24, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 25, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

October 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 10, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Carpal Tunnel Syndrome

Clinical Trials on Wrist and Thumb orthosis

3
Subscribe