Using a Community-level Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention to Address COVID-19 Testing Disparities

November 3, 2022 updated by: Maria E Fernandez, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Using a Community-level Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention to Address COVID-19 Testing Disparities: A Population-based Study

In collaboration with community partners, this study will identify disparities and dynamics of COVID-19 testing and infections in three Texas regions; and implement a multilevel intervention that increases access to testing and referrals to follow-up care among vulnerable populations. Using a three-arm group-randomized controlled trial, this study will assess the impact of multi-level interventions influencing motivation and access to testing.

The outcomes of this study are measured at the population level and no individual data will be gathered. Analyses of de-identified PHI data from local and regional health departments on COVID testing and infection rates will be used to assess intervention outcomes.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In the U.S. vulnerable populations experience significant disparities in terms of both COVID-19 infection and mortality rates, especially in Texas, where Hispanic, African Americans, and other groups have experienced substantial disparities in both incidence and mortality. Building on the partnerships and resources of the Center for Clinical and Translational Science (CCTS), the goal of the proposed project is to identify dynamic COVID-19 disease hotspots and testing deserts in racially diverse regions of South Texas, Houston/Harris County, Texas, and Northeast Texas to inform the rapid adaptation and deployment of multilevel level just-in-time adaptive intervention strategies to reduce testing disparities among vulnerable populations.

A group-randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted to evaluate the reach, effectiveness, and implementation of a community-level Just-In-Time-Adaptive-Intervention (JITAI) to increase COVID-19 testing in identified high-risk priority neighborhoods. To conduct the RCT, 120 priority census blocks groups will be identified and randomized to each condition using a community risk index score that balances distribution in the three study arms with respect to important characteristics including population density, demographics, and baseline testing rates.

In Intervention Condition 1 - Multi-Level Multi-Component Intervention (MLI), individuals will receive a multilevel, multi-component intervention comprising of 1) Building testing access for vulnerable populations, 2) Community Health Worker (CHW)-delivered navigation to COVID-19 testing and access and reinforcing risk mitigation recommendations; 3) 2-1-1 helpline-referrals and navigation to testing and 4) social marketing and small media campaign to provide geo-targeted messages promoting testing and COVID-19 risk mitigation behaviors. In Intervention Condition 2 - Community JITAI individuals will receive the same MLI intervention components but with an added JITAI approach informed by real-time data related to testing and other relevant information based on community and stakeholder experience and tacit knowledge about factors influencing testing determinants. The Comparison Condition will receive standard exposure to ongoing city and county communication and access to testing.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1280

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Brownsville, Texas, United States, 78520
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center, Brownsville
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
      • Tyler, Texas, United States, 75708
        • The University of Texas Health Science Center at Tyler

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • residing in identified COVID-19 hotspots and testing deserts within study regions
  • aged 18 years or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • aged under 18 years

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Multi-level Multi-Component Intervention (MLI)
Individuals receive COVID-19 CHW-delivered education and navigation, 2-1-1 helpline referrals, and social marketing messaging.
The strategic components of our multi-level, multi-component intervention (MLI) include: 1. Building testing access for vulnerable populations, 2) Community Health Worker (CHW)-delivered navigation to SARSCoV- 2 testing and access and reinforce risk mitigation recommendations, 3) 2-1-1 helpline-referrals and navigation to FDA approved SARSCoV- 2 testing (and self sampling once approved) and risk mitigation education, and 4) social marketing and small media campaign to provide geo-targeted messages promoting testing and COVID risk mitigation behaviors. We selected these components because of their evidence base, their current use by partners in response to COVID 19, and confidence that they can be adapted through a community engaged process as described.
Experimental: Community Just-in-Time-Adaptive Intervention (JITAI)
Individuals receive MLI intervention components that are informed by real-time data and community stakeholder feedback.
This intervention includes the same MLI components described above, with an added JITAI approach. Community and stakeholder partners will use real-time data related to testing and other relevant information generated by the Epidemiologic Surveillance and Analysis team (ESA) in Aim 1, as well as other information based on their community and stakeholder experience and tacit knowledge about factors influencing testing determinants, to adapt intervention activities as needed to optimize access to testing.
No Intervention: Comparison Condition
Individuals receive standard exposure to ongoing city and county COVID-19 communication and testing.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Testing Uptake
Time Frame: Baseline through study completion (26 months)
Examine the short and long-term change in testing proportion from baseline in the CBGs adjusted for testing capacity (testing proportion in the county during the same time period)
Baseline through study completion (26 months)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Disparities in Testing
Time Frame: Baseline through study completion (26 months)
Explore impact on testing disparities by race/ethnicity and SES
Baseline through study completion (26 months)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Maria Fernandez, PhD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
  • Principal Investigator: Belinda E Reininger, DrPh, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Brownsville
  • Principal Investigator: David D McPherson, MD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
  • Principal Investigator: Paul McGaha, DO, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Tyler
  • Principal Investigator: Marcia C de Oliveira Otto, PhD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
  • Principal Investigator: Kayo Fujimoto, PhD, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 7, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 19, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 4, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on Multi-Level Multi-Component Intervention (MLI)

Subscribe