Effects of an ACT-based Psychological Treatment in Relatives of People With Intellectual Disabilities

November 28, 2022 updated by: Universidad Europea de Madrid

Parental Stress, Health and Disabilities. A Training Programme in Psychological Flexibility During COVID 19

Investigation of the efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for the psychological treatment of parental stress in relatives of people with intellectual disabilities

Study Overview

Status

Active, not recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

After being informed about the study, all patients giving written informed consent will be assessed to determine eligibility for study entry.

Patients who meet eligibility requirements will receive psychological intervention consisting in 3-session group ACT-based treatment.

The participants will be assessed through self-report instruments before and after treatment and at 3 months follow-up.

The clinical trial will include a control group.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

21

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Villaviciosa De Odón
      • Madrid, Villaviciosa De Odón, Spain, 28670
        • Universidad Europea de Madrid

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 18 years of age
  • High level of understanding of Spanish
  • Having children diagnosed with intellectual disability

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current psychological and/or psychiatric treatment,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment
Psychological intervention will consist in an 3-session group ACT-based treatment.
Psychological intervention focused on (a) values clarification, (b) defusion strategies, (c) training in flexible attention to the present moment (mindfulness), and (d) committed action and psychological acceptance through metaphors and experiential exercises.
No Intervention: Waiting List
Participants assigned to Waiting List arm waited for 5 months before receiving treatment (i.e., after completing the measures they continued in the study and received Psychological intervention five months later)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Perceived Stress Scale (PSS)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline perceived stress at 4 months
Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) is a one-dimensional scale with 14 items that are answered on a Likert-type scale ranging from 0 (Never) to 5 (Very often). The direct scores range from 0 to 56; higher scores indicate higher perceived stress and worse outcome.
Change from Baseline perceived stress at 4 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Parental Acceptance Questionnaire (6-PAQ)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Psychological Inflexibility at 4 months
Parental Acceptance Questionnaire (6-PAQ) is a 16-item questionnaire on a Likert-type scale with four answer options in a range from 1 (Strongly Disagree) to 4 (Strongly Agree) that assesses six processes related to psychological flexibility (being present, values, committed action, self as context, cognitive defusion, and acceptance) and three flexible response styles (opened, centred and committed). The scores vary from 16 to 64; the higher the score, the higher psychological inflexibility levels and worse outcome.
Change from Baseline Psychological Inflexibility at 4 months
Change in Psychological Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline Psychological Well-Being at 4 months
Psychological Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) contains 12 items on a Likert-type scale with four answer options in a range from 0 (Strongly Disagree) to 3 (Strongly Agree). Higher scores indicate lower levels of psychological well-being and worse outcome.
Change from Baseline Psychological Well-Being at 4 months
Change in White Bear Suppression Inventory (WBSI)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline thoughts suppression at 4 months
White Bear Suppression Inventory (WBSI) evaluates the tendency to suppress unwanted thoughts. It is a Likert scale of 15 items with five response options ranging from 1 (Completely Disagree) to 5 (Completely Agree). Scores range from 15 to 75. Higher scores indicate a stronger thought suppression tendency and worse outcomes.
Change from Baseline thoughts suppression at 4 months
Change in Behavioural self-monitoring
Time Frame: Change from Baseline punitive-hostile and supportive-companion behaviours at 1 month.
Behavioral self-monitoring captures behaviour change. Family members recorded a daily estimation of the frequency of two categories of behaviours: punitive-hostile behaviours from family members to children with disabilities (e.g., shouting, punishments, insults, or aggressions) and supportive-companion behaviours (e.g., helping, shared leisure and recognition or compliments). A Likert-type scale was used to estimate frequency, with values from 0 to 4 (0= never; 1= almost never; 2= sometimes; 3= often; and 4= always) Participants completed daily self-monitoring, starting one week before the intervention (forming the baseline scenario) until one week after the intervention, obtaining a total of 4 measures. Higher scores in punitive-hostile behaviours indicate higher levels of punitive-hostile behaviours and worse outcome. Higher scores in supportive-companion behaviours indicate higher levels of supportive-companion behaviours and better outcome.
Change from Baseline punitive-hostile and supportive-companion behaviours at 1 month.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Francisco Montesinos, PhD, Universidad Europea de Madrid

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 15, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 3, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 3, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CIPI/21/091

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parent-Child Relations

Clinical Trials on ACT

Subscribe