Catheter Directed Therapy in Intermediate Risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients

November 9, 2022 updated by: Ayman khairy Mohamed, Assiut University

Catheter Directed Therapy for Intermediate Risk Pulmonary Embolism Patients Guided by Prediction Model for Impending Shock

Aim of the work:

  1. To compare conventional medical therapy versus catheter-directed therapy in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism.
  2. To define predictors of progression from intermediate to high-risk in medically-treated patients for ideal timing for intervention.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Based on history, physical examination, surface 12-lead ECG, bed-side echocardiography, patients with a high probability of acute pulmonary embolism are selected and subjected to CT pulmonary angiography to confirm the diagnosis and calculate the pulmonary artery obstruction score.

Routine labs are withdrawn, including cardiac troponin.Methods:

Detailed TTE will be done with emphasis on the following indicators of RV strain and/or dysfunction:

  1. Echocardiography findings that are indicative of RV dysfunction

    • tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE)
    • S' Velocity
    • the McConnell's sign
  2. RV dilation
  3. interventricular septal flattening.
  4. elevated right ventricular pressures
  5. plethoric inferior vena cava
  6. tricuspid regurgitation
  7. Direct visualization of thromboembolic in the RT heart and PA
  8. RV stroke volume measured by RVOT VTI.
  9. LV stroke volume measured by LVOT VTI Intermediate-high risk patient will be identified (based on the calculated pulmonary embolism severity index, RV dysfunction on TTE and/or CT, cardiac troponin), and then randomized to either receiving conventional medical treatment or catheter-directed interventional therapy if the patient consents.

7. Catheter directed therapy

A. Mechanical embolectomy:

Mechanical fragmentation will be done using a 6 F pigtail catheter inserted inside the thrombus guided by the CTPA images.

Hydro-mechanical defragmentation (HMD) is one of the CDT modalities for high-risk PE patients, in which rapid pigtail rotation is combined with heparinized saline injection for thrombus fragmentation.(4)

B. Suction embolectomy:

Suction embolectomy was one of the earliest techniques for transcatheter treatment of PE, and was introduced by Greenfield et al, using a 12-Fr catheter with a cup on its distal end. Suction was applied manually to the catheter hub with a large syringe. (13) The Penumbra Indigo aspiration system (Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA, USA) that will be used, is an 8-Fr device and its associated tubing, pump, and separator, has the flexibility for placement in segmental branches of the pulmonary arteries. The Indigo aspiration system is indicated for use in the peripheral arterial system and the pulmonary arteries, receiving U.S. Food and Drug Administration 510(k) clearance for PE in December 2019.(14)

C. Catheter directed thrombolysis:

Catheter-directed thrombolysis allows delivery of the thrombolytic agent directly to the area of highest embolic burden via a catheter.

Intermediate-high risk patient will be identified (based on the calculated pulmonary embolism severity index, RV dysfunction on TTE and/or CT, cardiac troponin), and then randomized to either receiving conventional medical treatment or catheter-directed interventional therapy if the patient consents.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Early Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Acute pulmonary embolism patients (confirmed by CT pulmonary angiography [CTPA])
  • symptoms started within 15 days of enrollment
  • intermediate-high risk pulmonary embolism patients , i.e., who have all of the following risk indicators combined :(2) i.Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) class III-V or sPESI ≥1, ii.AND RV dysfunction on TTE or CTPA, iii.AND elevated cardiac troponin levels
  • with none of the following high-risk presentations: cardiac arrest, systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg, or vasopressors required to achieve a BP ≥90 mmHg despite an adequate filling status, or end-organ hypoperfusion.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • high risk patients who are hemodynamically unstable (cardiogenic shock, SBP <90 mmHg, or use of intotropic support).
  • low risk patients with no RV dysfunction.
  • Patients with history of CTEPH (or previous acute PE)
  • Patients known to have other pulmonary hypertension, apart from group IV (CTEPH).
  • Patients with sever kidney injury (eGFR <30 mg/dl/1.7m2).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: catheter directed therapy group in intermediate risk pulmonary embolism patients

in this arm, intermediated risk pulmonary embolism patients is treated by intervention in the form of:

  • A. Mechanical embolectomy: by hydromechanical defragmentation by pigta
  • B. Suction embolectomy: using The Penumbra Indigo aspiration system
  • C. Catheter directed thrombolysis:
Hydro-mechanical defragmentation (HMD) is one of the CDT modalities for high-risk PE patients, in which rapid pigtail rotation is combined with heparinized saline injection for thrombus fragmentation

The Penumbra Indigo aspiration system (Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA, USA) that will be used, is an 8-Fr device and its associated tubing, pump, and separator, has the flexibility for placement in segmental branches of the pulmonary arteries.

510(k) Number :K160449 FOIA Releasable 510(k) K160449 Device Name:Penumbra System, Penumbra Pump MAX

Active Comparator: medical therapy group in intermediate risk pulmonary embolism patients
in this arm, intermediated risk pulmonary embolism patients is treated by routine anticoagulation only.
Hydro-mechanical defragmentation (HMD) is one of the CDT modalities for high-risk PE patients, in which rapid pigtail rotation is combined with heparinized saline injection for thrombus fragmentation

The Penumbra Indigo aspiration system (Penumbra Inc., Alameda, CA, USA) that will be used, is an 8-Fr device and its associated tubing, pump, and separator, has the flexibility for placement in segmental branches of the pulmonary arteries.

510(k) Number :K160449 FOIA Releasable 510(k) K160449 Device Name:Penumbra System, Penumbra Pump MAX

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
1.comparison between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients
Time Frame: up to 2 years
comparison in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy as regarding safety and efficacy of the therapy by clinical assessment of occurrence of major adverse cardiac events.
up to 2 years
1.comparison between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients
Time Frame: up to 2 years
comparison in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy as regarding safety and efficacy of the therapy by echocardiographic assessment of right ventricular function by TAPSE (mm) , RV/LV diameter ratio ,TR peak gradient (mmHg)
up to 2 years
1.comparison between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients
Time Frame: up to 2 years
comparison in intermediate high risk acute pulmonary embolism patients between conventional medical therapy and catheter-directed therapy as regarding safety and efficacy of the therapy by CT pulmonary angiography to asses embolus size and Pulmonary artery obstruction index
up to 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
predictors of progression from intermediate to high-risk acute pulmonary embolism patients
Time Frame: up to 2 years
identifying predictors for ideal timing for intervention in intermediate risk pulmonary embolism patients who are medically-treated by new echocardiographic parameters (LVOT velocity time integral and RVOT velocity time integral)
up to 2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Implementation of pulmonary embolism response team at Assiut university hospitals
Time Frame: up to 2 years
institutional reconstruction and communication between different departments (chest, cardiology, radiology and clinical pathology departments) aiming to implement a pulmonary embolism response team with clear structure and operational levels for decision making
up to 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Shrouk K Ali, MSc, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 30, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 16, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 10, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 9, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Pulmonary Embolism Subacute Massive

Clinical Trials on Mechanical embolectomy: by hydromechanical defragmentation by pigtail

3
Subscribe