Feasibility and Efficacy of a Brief Digital Self-efficacy Training (SEAPP)

November 13, 2022 updated by: University of Zurich

Feasibility and Efficacy of a Brief Digital Self-efficacy Training in University Students With Self-reported Elevated Stress: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The study investigates the effects of a digital, scalable self-efficacy training of repeated recall of self-efficacy memories on mental health outcomes, such as self-efficacy, anxiety, stress, hopelessness, and other mental health outcomes. A total of 94 students with elevated stress levels (≤ 13 on the Perceived Stress Scale) will be recruited and randomly assigned to training and control group. Individuals will either engage in the self-efficacy training app combined with Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) for 1 week (training group) or in EMA only for 1 week (control group). Baseline and post assessments will measure changes in self-efficacy, anxiety, stress, hopelessness, and other mental health outcomes.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Self-efficacy is associated with positive mental health outcomes and has been proposed as a putative contributor to therapeutic outcomes in the treatment of mental health problems. It can be enhanced through experimental inductions and the recall of autobiographical mastery experiences, which have mostly been conducted in person and in the laboratory until today.

The study will investigate effects of a digital, scalable self-efficacy training of repeated recall of self-efficacy memories on mental health outcomes, such as self-efficacy, anxiety, stress, hopelessness, and other mental health outcomes. The study will recruit 94 students with elevated stress levels (≤ 13 on the Perceived Stress Scale) and randomly assigned them to training and control group. Individuals will either engage in the self-efficacy training app combined with Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) for 1 week (training group) or in EMA only for 1 week (control group). Baseline and post assessments will measure changes in self-efficacy, anxiety, stress, hopelessness, and other mental health outcomes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Select...
      • Zurich, Select..., Switzerland, 8008
        • Birgit Kleim

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 25 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • being enrolled at a Swiss university
  • aged between 18 and 29 years
  • experiencing at least moderate stress (score of ≥13 on the Perceived Stress Scale
  • owning a smartphone
  • speaking fluent German

Exclusion Criteria:

-current psychiatric disorder

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Experimental: Self-efficacy training (App)
This group will receive a digital one week self-efficacy training with three training sessions per day and EMA (10 per day).
The training starts with a psychoeducational video and instructions to define two autobiographical self-efficacy The individuals will then receive three self-efficacy trainings per day based on their autobiographical memories and combined with a slow breathing exercise. Additionally, they will receive 10 daily EMA questionnaires on mood, social contacts, and virtual context.
No Intervention: Control
This group will receive EMA questionnaires for one week (10 per day).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
General self-efficacy
Time Frame: change from baseline to 1 day post intervention; time frame: 1 week
The General Self-Efficacy Scale (Schwarzer & Jerusalem, 1995; Tipton & Worthington, 1984) will measure the general self-efficacy.
change from baseline to 1 day post intervention; time frame: 1 week

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Perceived stress
Time Frame: change from screening to 1 day post intervention; time frame: 1 week
The Perceived Stress Scale (Cohen, Kamarck, & Mermelstein, 1983; Klein et al., 2016) will measure perceived stress.
change from screening to 1 day post intervention; time frame: 1 week
Positive and negative affect
Time Frame: The Positive and Negative Affect Scale (Krohne, Egloff, Kohlmann, & Tausch, 1996; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) will measure positive and negative affect.
change from baseline to 1 day post intervention; time frame: 1 week
The Positive and Negative Affect Scale (Krohne, Egloff, Kohlmann, & Tausch, 1996; Watson, Clark, & Tellegen, 1988) will measure positive and negative affect.
Hope
Time Frame: change from baseline to 1 day post intervention; time frame: 1 week
The Trait Hope Scale (Krause, 2002; Snyder et al., 1991) will measure hope.
change from baseline to 1 day post intervention; time frame: 1 week
Depression
Time Frame: The Beck Depression Inventory-II (Beck, Steer, Ball, & Ranieri, 1996; Kuhner, Burger, Keller, & Hautzinger, 2007) will measure depression.
change from baseline to 1 day post intervention; time frame: 1 week
The Beck Depression Inventory-II (Beck, Steer, Ball, & Ranieri, 1996; Kuhner, Burger, Keller, & Hautzinger, 2007) will measure depression.
Anxiety
Time Frame: change from baseline to 1 day post intervention; time frame: 1 week
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Laux, Glanzmann, Schaffner, & Spielberger, 1981; Spielberger, Gorsuch, Lushene, Gagg, & Jacobs, 1983) will measure state and trait anxiety.
change from baseline to 1 day post intervention; time frame: 1 week
Hopelessness
Time Frame: change from baseline to 1 day post intervention; time frame: 1 week
The Beck Hopelessness Scale (Beck, Weissman, Lester, & Trexler, 1974; Kliem, Lohmann, Mossle, & Brahler, 2018) will measure hopelessness.
change from baseline to 1 day post intervention; time frame: 1 week

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Positive and negative affect
Time Frame: Daily measured; changes in the course of the study participation
EMA will capture positive and negative mood at 10 time points per day during the one week study participation. We will measure positive mood using three items (cheerful, happy, and relaxed) and negative mood using seven items (irritated, anxious, insecure, lonely, sad, overthinking, and stressed).
Daily measured; changes in the course of the study participation
Dissatisfaction with social contacts
Time Frame: daily measured; changes in the course of the study participation
EMA will capture dissatisfaction with social contacts at 10 time points per day during the one week study participation. There will be two options indicating dissatisfaction with social contacts: (a) being with nobody and feeling excluded or wanting to be with someone or (b) being with someone and rather wanting to be alone. We combined these into one variable.
daily measured; changes in the course of the study participation
Specific self-efficacy
Time Frame: daily measured in training group only; changes in the course of the study participation
Specific self-efficacy will be captured once per day. Questions will focus on e. g. the participant's level of agreement with statements such as "Right now, I think I will be able to do what is necessary to make this training successful".
daily measured in training group only; changes in the course of the study participation
Virtual context
Time Frame: daily measured; changes in the course of the study participation
EMA will capture virtual context at 10 time points per day during the one week study participation. Questions will be about who the person is with and how they feel about it.
daily measured; changes in the course of the study participation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

November 9, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 15, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • SEAPPUZH

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

IPD Plan Description

It is planned to make the anonymised data available on a public repository.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stress

Clinical Trials on Self-efficacy App

Subscribe