Clinical Performance of Bioceramic vs High Viscosity GIC for Cervical Restorations of Geriatric Patients

November 13, 2022 updated by: Mariam Mohammed Abd Al-Naieem, Cairo University

Clinical Performance of Bioactive Bioceramic Glass Ionomer Restorations vs Conventional High Viscous Glass Ionomer Restorations in Geriatric Patients With Carious Cervical Lesions: A One Year Randomized Clinical Trial.

The aim of this study is to clinically evaluate the performance of the bioceramic glass ionomer compared to conventional high viscosity glass ionomer for restoration of carious cervical lesions in geriatric patients over 12 months follow up.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

28

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

55 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Geriatric patients aged above 55 years
  • Patients with untreated carious lesions
  • Patients who have at least 20 teeth under occlusion
  • Patients with normal occlusion
  • Vital teeth with carious cervical lesion with asymptomatic vital pulp.
  • Teeth with no or minimum mobility.
  • Teeth with normal occlusion.
  • Teeth with surrounding healthy gingiva and supporting-structures.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are unable to return for recall appointments
  • Presence of abnormal oral, medical or mental conditions.
  • Patients with severe medical diseases.
  • Patients with xerostomia
  • Patients with parafunctional habits.
  • Non vital teeth.
  • Teeth with signs or symptoms of pulpitis.
  • Teeth with non carious lesions.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bioceramic glass ionomer restoration
Calcium aluminate modified glass ionomer
bioactive glass ionomer with unique biocompatibility and biological regenerative properties
Active Comparator: Resin modified glass ionomer restoration
type II resin modified glass ionomer cement
A hybrid of glass ionomer and composite resin with acid-base and polymerizable components

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Marginal adaptation score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical)
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Retention score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical)
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Color match score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical)
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Marginal discoloration score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical)
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Secondary caries score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical)
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Wear score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical)
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Change in Postoperative hypersensitivity score
Time Frame: Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Modified USPHS criteria with Alpha, Bravo and Charlie scores (Categorical)
Baseline, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 13, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cervical Caries

Clinical Trials on Bioceramic glass ionomer restoration

Subscribe