Randomised Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy of an Online Cognitive Rehabilitation Programme (COPERIA-COG) for Patients With Persistent COVID-19 (COPERIA-COG)

November 29, 2022 updated by: Fundacin Biomedica Galicia Sur

The pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2 infection has led to the emergence of diffuse and heterogeneous persistent symptoms in addition to the well-known acute symptoms, which have come to be referred to as persistent COVID. In particular, one of the frequent complaints of patients with a previous diagnosis of COVID is impaired cognitive ability.

Various cognitive rehabilitation programmes have benefited from incorporating the methodology of so-called "serious games" are designed to train or change behaviour while entertaining players. The design of the online rehabilitation programme (COPERIA-COG) took into account the principles of neuropsychological rehabilitation (neuropsychological pre-assessment, operational goal setting, task prioritisation and continuous feedback system) and combined different individual techniques, such as restitution and compensation. Patients treated with COPERIA-COG will show neuropsychological improvements in verbal memory compared to the waiting list group.

The main objective is to identify differences in long-term memory in patients treated with COPERIA-COG vs. patients on the waiting list. For this purpose, both groups will be evaluated through RAVLT, taking the long-term memory subtest as a reference, comparing the results before and after the active group performs the online training with COPERIA-COG.

The COPERIA platform is a cloud platform that provides a range of ICT tools for monitoring and aiding the recovery of patients with persistent COVID. To achieve this goal, the platform will store patient data to which Artificial Intelligence techniques will be applied to perform an assessment of the affected person.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

88

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Ourense, Spain, 32002
        • Complexo Hospitalario Universitario de Ourense
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Alejandro García Caballero, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • María Bustillo Casado, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • María Dolores Díaz López, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Pablo López Mato, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Luis Docasar Bertolo, MD
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Beatriz Gómez Gómez, MD
    • Pontevedra
      • Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain, 36213
        • Galicia Sur Health Research Institute (IISGS) - Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age ≥18 and ≤70 years old.
  2. Read and write.
  3. Diagnosis of persistent COVID according to WHO criteria.
  4. The patient reports cognitive dysfunction with self-assessed impact of at least grade 2 on the Post-Covid Functional Status (Chile) (Klok et al., 2020, Lorca et al., 2021).
  5. The patient does not present cognitive dysfunction to a degree equal to or greater than 1.5 SD assessed in the psychology consultation by means of the following instruments: RAVLT Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test (Schmidt, 1996). Subtests of the Number Key, Symbol Search and Digit Span of the Scale for Measuring Adult and Adolescent Intelligence (WAIS III) (Wechsler, 1999). TMT Stroke Test (Reitan & Wolfson, 1993). Verbal fluency tests (Benton et al., 1989). In case of scores above 1.5 SD below the normative mean, they will be excluded from the study and referred for treatment to the Brain Injury Unit (Winblad et al., 2004).
  6. Patients with capacity to consent and agree to participate in the study.
  7. Patients who know how to use and have a Smartphone or Tablet and an Internet connection.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Minors or persons legally incapacitated.
  2. Previous neurological or psychiatric pathology involving neuropsychological compromise.
  3. Active Covid19 infection.
  4. Home oxygen therapy > 16 hours or home CPAP-BiPAP.
  5. Be undergoing another cognitive rehabilitation process at the time of inclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intervention
They will perform an initial test of processing speed, attentional span and executive control. After this test, they will start the training programme. It consists of 40 sessions of cognitive stimulation, distributed over 8 weeks of treatment with a frequency of five sessions per week. In the last session, a final test will be performed, the same as the initial one.
40 sessions of cognitive stimulation of approximately 20 minutes duration per session are carried out, using the COPERIA platform.
No Intervention: Waiting list

They will perform an initial test of processing speed, attentional span and executive control. In the last session, 8 weeks after the initial test, a final test will be performed, the same as the initial one.

They will have the opportunity to perform the same training as the experimental group after performing the final test. At 8 weeks, patients on the waiting list will be taught, if the wish, how to use the platform to perform the stimulation. They will be offered cognitive training with COPERIA-COG under the same conditions, periodicity, automatic reminders and calls from the psychologist as in the intervention group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
RAVLT Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test
Time Frame: 8 weeks
An instrument that has proven useful in assessing verbal learning and memory. Easily administered test that assesses immediate memory span, new learning, susceptibility to interference and recognition memory.
8 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subtests of the Number Key, Symbol Search and Digit Search Scale for Measuring Adult and Adolescent Intelligence (WAIS III)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
They allow the calculation of the processing speed index. The Spanish adaptation of the WAIS-III was used. Reliability coefficients (two halves) range from .77 to .96.
8 weeks
Trail Making Test (TMT)
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The test consists of two parts, A and B. Part A assesses sustained attention, processing speed, motor skills and visuospatial visual search skills. Part B assesses alternating attention and cognitive flexibility. Its reliability is between 0.86% and 0.94% and its reliability is .66. Neuronorm scales are used in Spain
8 weeks
Verbal fluency tests
Time Frame: 8 weeks
The investigators will use the phonemic fluency test, a task of oral production of words before phonetic commands (P-M-R) and the semantic fluency test (animals), a task of linguistic production that requires the implementation of the mechanisms of access to the lexicon. Neuronorm scales are used in Spain. The scale is made with scalar scores from 2 to 18, where 2 is the worst score and 18 is the best.
8 weeks
Memory Failures Everyday-30 (MFE-30)
Time Frame: 8 weeks

It is a 30-item questionnaire that explores the relationships between the occurrence of memory complaints, prefrontal symptomatology and perceived stress.

The scale has values between 0-120. Where 120 is indicative of more severe impairment in daily functioning and 0 indicates optimal functioning.

8 weeks
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS Scale)
Time Frame: 8 weeks

The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was originally designed as a screening instrument for the detection of patients with affective disorders in response to the drawbacks of widely used instruments such as the GHQ. It consists of two sets of seven items -one representing the anxiety subscale and the other the depression subscale- both of which are psychopathological concepts of anxiety and depression independent.

There are two subscales (anxiety and depression) with a score from 0 to 21 each. Scores greater than 10 are considered indicative of morbidity, scores between 8-10 are considered bordeline and scores less than 8 indicate no significant morbidity.

8 weeks
Adherence to online treatment
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Number of games played and total time of use will be extracted from the platform, analysing whether there are differences by age or gender or severity.
8 weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Years
8 weeks
Sex
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Male, Female
8 weeks
Current treatment
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Treatment taken by the patient at the time of the study.
8 weeks
Epidemic wave
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Of the 7 waves of COVID-19 that have occurred in Spain, a description will be given of the wave to which the infection of each patient included belonged. First, second, third, fourth, fifth, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth or tenth wave.
8 weeks
Vaccination status at the time of infection
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Number of vaccine doses at the time of infection
8 weeks
Level of education attained
Time Frame: 8 weeks
School, High school, College, Superior
8 weeks
Employment status
Time Frame: 8 weeks
Employed, unemployed, retired
8 weeks
Date of the SARS-CoV-2 PCR+
Time Frame: 8 weeks
DD-MMM-YYYY
8 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 14, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

November 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 28, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 2, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 29, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Clinical Trials on Sessions of cognitive stimulation

Subscribe