Common Factors, Responsiveness and Outcome in Psychotherapy (CROP)

Common Factors, Responsiveness and Outcome in Psychotherapy (CROP): Study Protocol for an Observational Study of Psychotherapy in Private Practice

The "Common Factors, Responsiveness and Outcome of Psychotherapy" (CROP) study is a naturalistic observational study at the University of Copenhagen (UCPH) carried out in cooperation with psychologists in the Danish practice sector or in private practice. The study aims to examine the contribution of client, therapist and treatment characteristics, as well as the role of therapists' responsiveness, on the process and outcome of psychotherapy. Participating psychologists and clients fill out background questionnaires prior to initiating therapy, and process data for each course of treatment is collected weekly and after each session while outcome data is collected at end of treatment and at three months follow-up. The psychologists are reimbursed DKK 1,000 per client that contributes to the study with at least three session questionnaires, which corresponds to the hourly salary of a psychologist in Danish private practice. All data is collected through an automated, online database to ensure appropriate anonymization and data management, and all participants give informed consent prior to participation. The CROP study has been approved by the UCPH's Department of Psychology's ethical review board and the Danish Data Protection Agency.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of the Common factors, Responsiveness and Outcome in Psychotherapy study (CROP) is to determine client and psychologist characteristics and therapeutic processes associated with the outcome of psychotherapy delivered by psychologists in the Danish practice sector or in private practice. The study addresses two main questions. First, how are specific characteristics of clients and psychologists related to the outcome of therapy and do these characteristics moderate the outcome of different psychotherapeutic approaches? Second, to what extent do therapists adapt their approach to client characteristics and preferences and how does such responsiveness impact the process and outcome of therapy? The results from the study are directly relevant to psychologists and will be disseminated nationwide during and after the end of the study.

The study is a naturalistic, observational study carried out in collaboration with psychologists in the Danish practice sector or in private practice. Self-report data is collected on the participating psychologists and their participating clients before psychotherapy, during psychotherapy (weekly and post-session) and after psychotherapy (at end of treatment and three months follow-up). The data is analyzed using multilevel modeling and structural equation modeling approaches.

The study design and data management procedure have been approved by the Research Ethics Board of the Department of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, and the Danish Data Protection Agency. All data are fully anonymized and stored in agreement with the Danish Act on Processing of Personal Data. All parts of the study are based on the principles of informed consent and clients are informed that they can terminate their participation in the study at any time without consequences to their treatment. The findings of the study will be presented in articles in international, peer-reviewed journals as well as to psychotherapy practitioners across Denmark.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Copenhagen, Denmark, 1353
        • Recruiting
        • University of Copenhagen
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All clients in individual psychotherapy aged 18 or older are eligible for the study, meaning that in principle all client diagnoses and referral reasons may be represented in the sample. However, in Denmark, reimbursement for psychological treatment in the practice sector is only provided for clients referred by their general practitioner for one of the 11 referral reasons and diagnoses presented below. Thus, clients meeting these characteristics are likely to be overrepresented within the sample.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Above 18 of age and in individual psychotherapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • severe psychoticism or other severe mental health issues.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Retrospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Psychologists in Danish private practice
All psychologists with a Danish university degree in psychology who have registered themselves as seeing clients in private practice (app. 1,750) have been invited to participate in the study. Thus, the sample of psychologists consists of psychologists employed in the Danish practice sector, where clients obtain a refund of 60% of the psychologist's salary, as well as psychologists working privately without any reimbursement of their salaries. Each psychologist enrolled in the study has agreed to aim to recruit no less than 10 clients each for the study. We aim to include 100 psychologists, which will yield a sample of 1,000 clients beginning therapy.
The psychotherapist will conduct psychotherapy as normally done by them in their practice. The treatment will thus be un-manualized and consist of a broad range of therapeutic orientations and treatment lengths.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in psychological symptoms measured by the BSI
Time Frame: Change in psychological symptoms from baseline until end-of-treatment (an average of 7 months).
The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI) is a self-report scale consisting of 53 items covering nine symptom dimensions: Somatization, obsessive-compulsive, interpersonal sensitivity, depression, anxiety, hostility, phobic anxiety, paranoid ideation and psychoticism.
Change in psychological symptoms from baseline until end-of-treatment (an average of 7 months).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in symptoms measured by the Symptom Checklist-11
Time Frame: Every week while the client is in therapy, up until 25 weeks of therapy.
Symptom Checklist-11 (SCL-11) is a short, multidimensional outcome measure for the evaluation of therapeutic progress in psychotherapy, consisting of 11 items selected from the BSI using a stepwise item selection procedure
Every week while the client is in therapy, up until 25 weeks of therapy.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 11, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 29, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 18, 2022

Last Verified

November 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

No participant data is planned to be shared with other researchers besides the CROP research team members.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Psychological Distress

Clinical Trials on Psychotherapy treatment

Subscribe