Circuit-Based Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson's Disease P1A2&3 Catalyst

January 22, 2026 updated by: University of Minnesota

This study will help us better understand how the brain works in people with Parkinson's disease (PD). PD is a brain disease that gets worse over time, and affects over 10 million people world-wide. A common treatment for PD is Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). To improve DBS therapy for PD, we need a deeper understanding of how the different parts of the brain work together in PD, and how this relates to movement and thinking problems that people with PD experience.

We may be able to use the results of this study to improve DBS treatments in the future.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Parkinson's disease (PD) is a progressive neurodegenerative disease affecting over 10 million people world-wide. It can be a debilitating disorder and although studied for decades, the physiological changes in the basal ganglia thalamocortical (BGTC) circuit that underlie its development remain under debate. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and internal globus pallidus (GPi) has been a highly effective therapy for many patients with PD, however, the results have been highly variable and may be associated with cognitive compromise in some patients. To advance DBS therapies for PD we require a deeper understanding of the local and network-wide circuit dynamics and their relationship to motor signs and cognitive function. This understanding will provide the rationale for optimizing STN and GPi DBS, targeting specific regions within the STN and GPi, and development of patient-specific DBS based on the patients' motor signs and cognitive profile

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

30

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States, 55445
        • Recruiting
        • University of Minnesota
        • Contact:
          • Michael Park, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

PD patients

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of idiopathic PD
  • Surgery at UMN to implant DBS system with directional lead(s) and multiple independent current control IPG is planned as part of routine clinical care
  • At least 21 years old

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Other significant neurological disorder
  • History of dementia
  • Patients with post-operative complications or adverse effects (e.g. ON stimulation dystonias) that affect patient safety or confound the experiment will be excluded from further study
  • Pregnant women
  • Known radiation exposure within the last year that is determined to be unsafe when compounded with the expected radiation dose from intraoperative fluoroscopy to place ECoG strip

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Parkinson's disease
  • Diagnosis of idiopathic PD
  • Surgery at UMN to implant DBS system with directional lead(s) and multiple independent current control IPG is planned as part of routine clinical care
  • At least 21 years old
  • Existing or planned 7T brain imagery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
reach-related modulation
Time Frame: 2 days
reach-related modulation in beta/HFO power in DBS lead LFPs across OFF, DBS, L-dopa, and DBS+L-dopa conditions.
2 days
N-back task trials
Time Frame: 2 days
directed connectivity between STN and DLPFC compared between the N-back task trials with and without stimulation.
2 days
rigidity and bradykinesia assessments
Time Frame: 1 day
differences in rigidity and bradykinesia assessments between conditions: off-stimulation vs eiDBS-suppression, off-stimulation vs eiDBS-amplification, eiDBS-suppression vs eiDBS-amplification.
1 day
peak frequency of the ERs + spontaneous LFPs
Time Frame: 1 day
the correlation between the peak frequency of the ERs in the GPi (or STN) and that of spontaneous LFPs in the GPi (or STN).
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
N-back task trials
Time Frame: 2 days
difference in directed connectivity between the correct reject N-back COGED trials across OFF, DBS, L-dopa, and DBS+L-dopa conditions, as well as measures of directed connectivity between STN/GPi and other ECoG sites (SC/MC/PMC/DLPFC) correlated to the N-back task trials correct response performance across the conditions mentioned above.
2 days
rigidity/bradykinesia measurements and correlations to conditions
Time Frame: 1 day
correlations between each of the rigidity/bradykinesia measurements and the following: 1) amplitude of beta band oscillations in the STN or GPi and 2) information flow between the GPi (or STN) and cortical regions, and 3) PAC. Other secondary outcomes on Day 3 include 1) the coherence between ERs in the GPi or STN and ERs observed in the MC, PMC, and DLPFC; and 2) the correlation of pathway-activation measures (AFtotal) with the amplitude of ERs in the GPi (or STN) across both stimulation settings and patients.
1 day
task vs. rest and topographical location
Time Frame: 2 days
task vs. rest, and topographical location, within each of the conditions.
2 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 28, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 12, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 22, 2026

Last Verified

January 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe