Program of Physical Activity, Nutrition and Supportive to Improve the Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Survivors (ADA)

July 15, 2025 updated by: Siel Bleu

Evaluating Effectiveness of an Integrative Intervention Based on Physical Activity, Nutrition and Supportive Care to Improve Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Survivors: Protocol for a Pragmatic Cluster Randomized Trial and Embedded Qualitative Study

Despite it being one of the leading causes of cancer death among women, survival following a breast cancer diagnosis has greatly increased in high-income countries. However; this gave rise to a growing population of women living long after breast cancer with a diminished quality of life (QoL) due to the long-term effects of cancer and cancer treatment.

Exercise can improve QoL, fatigue, and other mental and physical health outcomes in this population, and is strongly recommended among breast cancer survivors, much like a healthy diet. However adherence in real-life to these recommendations is seldom satisfactory. Also, evidence regarding the effect and cost-effectiveness of concurrent healthy lifestyle behaviors compared to exercise alone is limited. Hence the need to develop pragmatic (evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in real-life conditions) theoretical-based customized interventions, which aim to improve uptake and instill long-term adherence of health lifestyle among breast cancer survivors.

ADA (Activité physique adaptée Doublée d'un Accompagnement spécifique post-cancer) is an integrative intervention based on physical activity, nutrition and supportive care. The interventions aims to improve breast cancer survivors' physical and mental health and instill long-term healthy behaviors.

Our study will be a pragmatic two-arm (ADA intervention versus control/usual care) cluster randomized controlled trial which examines the effectiveness of the ADA intervention program.

The primary endpoint will be health-related quality of life, as measured at 12-month after the start of the trial.

Several secondary outcomes will also be assessed; which include Physical activity level, relationship to food and self-efficacy.

The study aims to recruit 160 participants in total, divided into 20 activity groups (clusters) of 8 participants.

Primary analyses will be carried out on an intention to treat (ITT) basis, at both cluster and participant level. All statistical analysis will adjust for the clustering of patients within centers as a random effect.

The aim of this trial is to provide scientific evidence on the 'real-world' effectiveness of an easily generalizable trial, with clinically-significant outcomes, touching a growing number of cancer survivors.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Charentes-maritimes
      • La Rochelle, Charentes-maritimes, France, 17
    • Cotes d'Armor
      • Saint-Brieuc, Cotes d'Armor, France, 22
    • Essonne
      • Arpajon, Essonne, France, 91
    • Finistere
      • Brest, Finistere, France, 29
    • Haute Garonne
      • Blagnac, Haute Garonne, France, 31
    • Maine Et Loire
      • Angers, Maine Et Loire, France, 49
        • Active, not recruiting
        • ANGERS
    • Pyrénées Atlantiques
      • Saint Pée sur Nivelle, Pyrénées Atlantiques, France, 64
        • Suspended
        • Pyrénées Atlantiques
    • Vendée
      • La Roche-sur-Yon, Vendée, France, 85

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 66 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult women who are between 18 and 72 years of age
  • had a diagnosis of localized breast cancer of any type, and who have completed their treatment (surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy) within the last 15 months, or still undergoing hormone therapy or nearing the end of their Herceptin treatment.
  • French-speaking
  • covered by the French Social Security system or benefiting from a similar health insurance system

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A cancer diagnosis other than breast cancer, or a relapse/metastasis of breast cancer, or generalized cancer,
  • A medical contraindication to exercise (a medical certificate of absence of contraindication to the practice of physical activity will be required, as for all physical activity in community settings).
  • Significant visual or auditory problems or behavioral problems that make it difficult to participate in group physical activity sessions.
  • a plan of moving away from the study site.
  • participating in another clinical trial
  • Male sex

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ADA intervention
The ADA intervention arm

The 12-weeks program will include one-hour in adapted physical activity (APA), and a discussion on relaxation techniques and the undertaking of deep breathing exercises (making them APA+ sessions). A series of "minute for nutrition" short information sheets will be distributed at the end of each session.

Two workshops on "living better after breast cancer" will also be offered: one on general mobility and the other on daily nutrition.

Moreover, women will be asked to set personal challenges as a method of motivational reinforcement, and will also be called for motivational check-ins at least 3 times. Follow-up calls will allow for further individualization, motivation, and the reception of participants' concerns or remarks.

Further, participants in the intervention group will have access to a dedicated internet space containing several documents and videos on topics of concern to patients during the post-treatment phase.

Active Comparator: Usual Care
The usual care arm

Participants in the control group will be offered weekly APA sessions for 12 weeks, these sessions are based on current practices within the Siel Bleu organization. Sessions' content is adapted to people who have been treated for (all types) cancer and are based on current recommendations.

These sessions are commonly organized by Siel Bleu in hospitals, community groups or local committees of the national league against cancer organization.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Health-related quality of life
Time Frame: 12 months after the beginning of the intervention
The primary endpoint will be the health-related quality of life, as measured by the FACIT-F global score. This score is based on the 27-items Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) scale ,and the 13-items fatigue subscale included in the FACIT-F. Higher score indicate better Quality of life.
12 months after the beginning of the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Relationship to food
Time Frame: At 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention
Measured using a scale adapted from the Positive Eating Scale. A Higher score indicates a positive relationship with eating.
At 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention
Self-efficacy
Time Frame: At 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention
people's beliefs about their ability to produce designated levels of performance that influence events that affect their lives, assessed by an ad-hoc scale
At 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention
Physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being
Time Frame: At 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention
measured separately by the FACT-G four different subscales. Higher score indicate better Quality of life.
At 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention
Fatigue
Time Frame: At 3 months, and 6 months after the beginning of the intervention
measured by the FACIT-F global score. This score is based on the 13-items fatigue subscale included in the FACIT-F.
At 3 months, and 6 months after the beginning of the intervention
Physical activity level
Time Frame: At 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention
Measured with the short version of the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF).A higher IPAQ-SF score indicates a better physical activity level..
At 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention
Motivation for physical activity Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2) scale
Time Frame: At 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention
assessed with the short form of Behavioral Regulation in Exercise Questionnaire-2 (BREQ-2). A higher BREQ-2 score indicates a better exercise motivation.
At 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention
Sedentary behavior (sitting time)
Time Frame: At 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention
measured with a questionnaire adapted from the Recent Physical Activity Questionnaire (RPAQ). A higher RPAQ score indicates a lower sedentary behavior level.
At 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after the beginning of the intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gwenn Menvielle, PhD, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
  • Principal Investigator: Patricia Dargent, PhD, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France
  • Study Chair: Fabienne El Khoury, PhD, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale, France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 6, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

January 1, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 16, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 20, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 16, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 15, 2025

Last Verified

July 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on ADA

Subscribe