Comparison Between Manta and Prostar Closure Devices

December 15, 2022 updated by: Jörg Schröder, RWTH Aachen University

Use of the Closure Device in Patient With Percutaneous Transfemoral Aortic Valve Replacement

Use of the closure device in patient with percutaneous transfemoral aortic valve replacement

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The advent of endovascular, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), and mechanical circulatory support has offered new, minimally invasive therapeutic options that are rapidly becoming standard of care. These percutaneous transfemoral interventions require large-bore catheters and have created challenges for femoral arterial access management. Current approaches include surgical cut-down with arterial puncture under direct vision, and suture-based "pre-closure." Surgical cut-down is associated with longer procedural time, increased patient discomfort, deeper anesthesia, risk of wound complications including infection, and slower ambulation. The pre-closure technique overcomes many of the disadvantages of surgical cut-down but can be technically demanding, time consuming, and associated with a significant failure rate. Recent randomized TAVR trials have reported major vascular complications in 6% to 8% . Furthermore, a study on the 2 suture-based closure techniques for management of TAVR access reported a 20% vascular complication rate despite being used by experienced operators . Currently, the majority of access site complications result from failed arteriotomy closure . The percutaneous MANTA Vascular Closure Device (VCD) (Essential Medical Inc., Malvern, Pennsylvania) is a novel collagen-based technology dedicated to closure of largebore arteriotomies . The MANTA VCD underwent prospective multicenter evaluation for Conformitä Europäenne (CE) mark approval in the first detailed report of outcomes achieved with a dedicated large-bore vascular closure device Contrary to the aforementioned TAVR procedures, mechanical circulatory support therapy can be extended up to several days on the intensive care ward. Data on such delayed closure with is lacking. This registry is therefore aimed to document the initial experiences of delayed closure of a femoral large bore access with vascular closure devices in patients with an TAVR device.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

250

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • NRW
      • Aachen, NRW, Germany, 52074
        • Universitätsklinikum Aachen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patient with planned treatment of aortic valve replacement will be asked to participate in the observational study

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient scheduled for treatment with the TAVR device 2. Decision to use the Manta or the Prostar closure device on a clinical base by the treating physician 3. Signed informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female aged < 18 2. Pregnant and lactating females 3. Patient has been committed to an institution by legal or regulatory order

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Pro Star
patient received Pro Star Device
aortic valve replacement
MANTA
Patient received MANTA Device
aortic valve replacement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Safety endpoints during index hospitalisation
Time Frame: 2018 - 2020
Major vascular complications,
2018 - 2020
Safety endpoints during index hospitalisation ( bleeding)
Time Frame: 2018-2020
life-threatining-, major bleeding
2018-2020
Safety endpoints during index hospitalisation ( death )
Time Frame: 2018-2020
death
2018-2020

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
efficacy endpoints during index hospitalisation - (hemotasis)
Time Frame: 2018-2020
hemotasis in angiogram
2018-2020
efficacy endpoints during index hospitalisation ( device failure)
Time Frame: 2018-2020
device failure
2018-2020
efficacy endpoints during index hospitalisation ( bail-out )
Time Frame: 2018-2020
need for stent-graft
2018-2020

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
preperation time
Time Frame: 2018-2020
preperation time for closure
2018-2020

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jörg Schröder, Universitätsklinikum Aachen Medizinische Klinik 1
  • Principal Investigator: Michael Lehrke, Universitätsklinikum Aachen Medizinische Klinik 1

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 20, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

March 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2022

First Posted (Estimate)

December 22, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 22, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 15, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

Study results will be published in an appropriate scientific journal. The Ethics Committee will be informed about the study results.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Valve Stenosis

Clinical Trials on Transfemoral aortic valve replacement

Subscribe