- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT07453407
ART Trial: Transcatheter J-VALVE Versus Surgery for Aortic Regurgitation Therapy (ART)
March 6, 2026 updated by: Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
J-VALVE Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement for Patients With Aortic Regurgitation Therapy
The overall purpose of ART trial is to establish the Safety and Efficacy of the J-VALVE Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Grade≥3+ Native Aortic Regurgitation.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Estimated)
1250
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Jian'an Wang, MD
- Phone Number: +86-571-8778-4808
- Email: wangjianan111@zju.edu.cn
Study Locations
-
-
Beijing Municipality
-
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100000
- Not yet recruiting
- Beijing Anzhen Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University
-
Contact:
- Guangyuan Song, MD
- Phone Number: +86-106-441-2431
- Email: songgy_anzhen@vip.163.com
-
Contact:
- Haibo Zhang, MD
- Phone Number: +86-106-441-2431
- Email: zhanghb2318@163.com
-
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 100000
- Not yet recruiting
- Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences
-
Contact:
- Xiangbin Pan, MD
- Phone Number: +86-106-831-4466
- Email: xiangbin428@hotmail.com
-
-
Guangdong
-
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510000
- Not yet recruiting
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital
-
Contact:
- Huiming Guo, MD
- Phone Number: +86-208-382-7812
- Email: guohuiming@gdph.org.cn
-
-
Hong Kong
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 999077
- Not yet recruiting
- Queen Mary Hospital
-
Contact:
- Simon Lam, MD
- Phone Number: 852-2255
- Email: drsimonlam@gmail.com
-
Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, 999077
- Not yet recruiting
- Prince of Wales Hospital
-
Contact:
- Kent So, MD
- Phone Number: +85-235-052-211
- Email: kentso987@gmail.com
-
-
Jiangsu
-
Nanjing, Jiangsu, China, 210000
- Not yet recruiting
- Nanjing First Hospital
-
Contact:
- Junjie Zhang, MD
- Phone Number: +86-255-227-1000
- Email: jameszll@163.com
-
-
Shaanxi
-
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China, 710000
- Not yet recruiting
- Xijing Hospital affiliated to Air Force Medical University
-
Contact:
- Jian Yang, MD
- Phone Number: +86-298-477-4114
- Email: yangjian1212@hotmail.com
-
-
Shanghai Municipality
-
Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 200000
- Not yet recruiting
- Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University
-
Contact:
- Lai Wei, MD
- Phone Number: +86-216-404-1990
- Email: Wei.lai@zs-hospital.sh.cn
-
-
Taiwan
-
Taibei, Taiwan, China, 100-116
- Not yet recruiting
- Cheng Hsin General Hospital
-
Contact:
- Jeng Wei, MD
- Phone Number: +86-228-264-400
- Email: jengwei@mac.com
-
Taibei, Taiwan, China, 100116
- Not yet recruiting
- National Taiwan University Hospital
-
Contact:
- Hsien-Li Kao, MD
- Phone Number: 022-312-3456
- Email: hsienli_kao@yahoo.com
-
-
Zhejiang
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310009
- Recruiting
- The Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
-
Contact:
- Jian'an Wang, MD
- Phone Number: +86-571-8731-5001
- Email: wangjianan111@zju.edu.cn
-
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China, 310000
- Not yet recruiting
- The First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine
-
Contact:
- Liang Ma, MD
- Phone Number: +86-571-8723-6114
- Email: 992960615@qq.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- 1) Age ≥65 years;
2) a. Symptomatic patients with severe AR b. Asymptomatic patients with severe AR and evidence of LV function impairment (per current ESC / ACC guidelines) Any of the following perimeters
- LVEF ≤55%
- LVESD >50 mm
- LVESDi >22 mm/m2
- LVESVi >45 mL/m2
- normal LV systolic function at rest (LVEF >55%), and a progressive decline in LVEF on at least 3 serial studies to the low-normal range (LVEF 55% to 60%) or a progressive increase in LV dilation into the severe range (LV end-diastolic dimension [LVEDD] >65 mm),
- 3) Evaluated by a multi-disciplinary heart team to be suitable for both surgery and transcatheter valve replacement
- 4) Informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions, has provided written informed consent, and agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits
Exclusion Criteria:
- 1. Confirmed moderate or less AR severity (Grade≤2+) by core laboratory evaluation
- 2. Moderate or severe aortic valve stenosis
- 3. Mixed with clinical relevant severe mitral or tricuspid disease that require valve intervention
- 4. Pre-existing mechanical or bioprosthetic valve in any position. (of note, mitral ring is not an exclusion)
- 5. Subject is high-risk for SAVR as determined by the local heart team
- 6. Subject refuses SAVR as a treatment option
- 7. Subject is selected for aortic valve repair or aortic surgery
- 8. Need for emergency surgery or TAVR for any reason
9. Anatomical exclusion criteria (ANY of the following):
- Aortic Annulus Perimeter <53 mm or >94 mm measured by CT
- Maximal ascending aortic diameter ≥50 mm
- Congenital aortic valve disease including unicuspid, bicuspid, or quadricuspid aortic valve anatomy
- Iliofemoral vessel characteristics that would preclude safe placement of the introducer sheath (e.g., calcification, tortuosity).
- Significant abdominal or thoracic aortic disease (such as porcelain aorta, severe calcification, aortic coarctation, etc.) that preclude safe passage of the delivery system or cannulation and aortotomy for surgical AVR.
- 10. Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring inotropic support, mechanical ventilation or mechanical heart assistance within 30 days of the screening visit
- 11. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implantation within 30 days of the screening visit
- 12. Any condition considered a contraindication to mechanical circulatory support
- 13. Hostile chest or conditions or complications from prior surgery that preclude safe reoperation (e.g., mediastinitis, radiation damage, abnormal chest wall, adhesion of aorta or IMA to sternum, etc.)
- 14. Subject refuses blood transfusion
- 15. Marfan syndrome or other known connective tissue disease that would necessitate aortic root replacement/intervention
- 16. Evidence of acute myocardial infarction within 30 days of the screening visit
- 17. Any percutaneous coronary or peripheral interventional procedure performed within 30 days of the screening visit (Subjects with placement of coronary or peripheral stent(s) should be assessed for the ability to safely proceed with SAVR within the protocol timeframe)
18. Complex coronary artery disease (one of the following):
- Unprotected left main coronary artery disease ≥50%
- True bifurcation lesion (Medina: 1.1.1) and the diameter of the branch vessels is >2.5 mm
- Chronic total occlusion (CTO)
- Long lesion, expected stent length >38 mm
- Multivessel lesion (at least 2 coronary arteries require interventional treatment)
- Need to use multiple stents (planned > 3 stents)
- Lesion with in-stent restenosis
- Severe calcification lesion
- Coronary ostial lesion
- Heart Team assessment that optimal revascularization cannot be performed with either CABG at the time of SAVR or PCI at the time of TAVR.
- 19. Symptomatic carotid or vertebral artery disease or carotid intervention within 30 days of the screening visit
- 20. Stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 90 days of the screening visit
- 21. Severe left ventricular dysfunction, defined as a resting left ventricular ejection fraction <25%; or left ventricular end-systolic diameter (LVESD) >70 mm; or the presence of an artificial heart or left ventricular assist device; or being listed for heart transplantation or status post heart transplantation.
- 22. Moderate to severe or worse right ventricular dysfunction on resting echocardiogram according to core laboratory
- 23. Cardiac imaging (echocardiography, CT, and/or MRI) evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation
- 24. Left atrial thrombus without continuous appropriate anticoagulation within 90 days of the study procedure
- 25. Uncontrolled atrial fibrillation (i.e., resting heart rate >120 bpm)
- 26. Hemodynamically significant hypertrophic Obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM), Peak LVOT gradient ≥50mmHg (resting or provoked) ESC 2022/ ACC 2020
- 27. Untread Leukopenia (WBC<3.0*109/L), Untread Thrombocytopenia (Platelet count <50*109), history of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy, or hypercoagulable states, Acute posthemorrhagic anemia (hemoglobin <9.0 g/dL)
- 28. Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (FEV1 <50% predicted) or currently on home oxygen
- 29. Severe pulmonary hypertension (e.g., PA systolic pressure ≥2/3 systemic pressure)
- 30. Severe chronic liver disease (Child-Pugh C) or any active liver disease
- 31. Renal insufficiency (eGFR<30mL/min/1.73m²) and/or requiring chronic peritoneal dialysis at the time of screening and/or requiring chronic hemodialysis at the time of screening
- 32. Ongoing sepsis or active infective endocarditis with ongoing antibiotic (including suppressive) therapy or positive blood cultures within 6 weeks
- 33. Subject has a known hypersensitivity or contraindication to all anticoagulation/antiplatelet medications (or inability to be anticoagulated for the index procedure), implant-related materials, or sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated
- 34. Inability to tolerate anti-thrombotic/anticoagulation therapy during or after the valve implant procedure
- 35. Active gastrointestinal bleeding precluding anticoagulation or antiplatelet therapy
- 36. BMI >50 kg/m2 or <18.5 kg/m2
- 37. Estimated life expectancy <24 months due to associated non- cardiac comorbid conditions
- 38. Immobility that would prevent completion of study procedures
- 39. Currently participating in a cardiovascular investigational drug or another device study and not yet completed follow-up for the primary endpoint. Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials. Observational studies are not considered exclusionary
- 40. Severe cognitive decline (resulting in either inability to provide informed consent for the trial/procedure, prevents independent lifestyle outside of a chronic care facility, or will fundamentally complicate rehabilitation from the procedure or compliance with follow-up visits)
- 41. Pregnancy or intent to become pregnant (women suspected of becoming pregnant must have a negative serum or urine test for human chorionic gonadotropin before being included in the study)
- 42. Other patients considered unsuitable for this clinical study by the investigator
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using J-VALVE Transfemoral Aortic Valve system
|
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) using J-VALVE Transfemoral Aortic Valve system
|
|
Other: Surgical aortic valve replacement(SAVR)
Surgical aortic valve replacement(SAVR)using commercially available surgical biological aortic valve replacement device
|
Surgical aortic valve replacement(SAVR)using commercially available surgical biological aortic valve replacement device
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 12 months
|
All-cause mortality at 12 months
|
12 months
|
|
All stroke
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Number of patients with stroke
|
12 months
|
|
Unplanned cardiac rehospitalization
Time Frame: 12 months
|
Number of patients who had unplanned cardiac rehospitalization
|
12 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Composite primary endpoints
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Comparing the superiority of the composite primary endpoint and its components in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days
|
|
New-onset atrial fibrillation
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Comparing the onset of atrial fibrillation in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days
|
|
Echocardiographic effective orifice area
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Comparing echocardiographic effective orifice area in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days
|
|
Moderate or greater patient prosthesis mismatch as measured by echocardiography
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Comparing moderate or greater patient prosthesis mismatched in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days
|
|
Cardiovascular rehospitalization
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Comparing the number of cardiovascular rehospitalizations in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days
|
|
Health-related quality of life assessed by Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-23)
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Comparing change in KCCQ-23 in TAVR with SAVR.
|
30 days
|
|
Length of index hospitalization
Time Frame: Pre-intervention/procedure surgery
|
Comparing TAVR length of index hospitalization with SAVR
|
Pre-intervention/procedure surgery
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Bleeding complications (life-threatening, disabling, or major)
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
Comparing bleeding complications in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
|
Major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE)
Time Frame: years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
|
Freedom of major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events
|
years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
|
|
Mortality (all-cause & cardiovascular)
Time Frame: 30 days,6 months and years 1, 5, 10
|
Comparing mortality (all-cause & cardiovascular in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days,6 months and years 1, 5, 10
|
|
Stroke (disabling and nondisabling)
Time Frame: 30days, 6 months and years 1, 5, 10
|
Comparing stroke (disabling and nondisabling) in TAVR with SAVR
|
30days, 6 months and years 1, 5, 10
|
|
Death or stroke
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Comparing death or stroke in TAVR with SAVR
|
1 year
|
|
Death or disabling stroke
Time Frame: 30 days, and 1 year
|
Comparing death or disabling strokein TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days, and 1 year
|
|
Major vascular complications
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Comparing major vascular complications in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days
|
|
Other procedural or valve-related complications
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Comparing other procedural or valve-related complications in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days
|
|
Technical success
Time Frame: Exit from procedure room
|
Comparing technical success in TAVR with SAVR
|
Exit from procedure room
|
|
Device success
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Comparing device success in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days
|
|
Myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
Comparing myocardial infarction in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
|
Coronary obstruction requiring intervention
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
Comparing coronary obstruction requiring intervention in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days, 6 months and 1 year
|
|
Acute kidney injury
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Comparing acute kidney injury in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days
|
|
Renal replacement therapy
Time Frame: 1 year
|
Comparing renal replacement therapy in TAVR with SAVR
|
1 year
|
|
New permanent pacemaker implantation
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months and years 1, 5, 10
|
Comparing new permanent pacemaker implantation in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days, 6 months and years 1, 5, 10
|
|
Conduction disturbance and arrhythmias
Time Frame: 30 days,6 months and 1 year
|
Comparing conduction disturbance and arrhythmias in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days,6 months and 1 year
|
|
New York Heart Association class
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months and years 1, 5, and 10
|
Comparing change in New York Heart Association class in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days, 6 months and years 1, 5, and 10
|
|
Hemodynamic valve performance evaluated by echocardiography
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months and at years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10.
|
Comparing hemodynamic valve performance evaluated by echocardiography in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days, 6 months and at years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10.
|
|
Other echocardiographic parameters
Time Frame: 30 days, and years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10.
|
Comparing other echocardiographic parameters in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days, and years 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10.
|
|
Cardiovascular rehospitalization
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months,1 year, and annually until 10 years
|
Comparing cardiovascular rehospitalizations( the time to first event and number of events) in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days, 6 months,1 year, and annually until 10 years
|
|
ICU days
Time Frame: Time from immediate post-operation to ICU discharge
|
Comparing ICU days in TAVR with SAVR
|
Time from immediate post-operation to ICU discharge
|
|
Redo valve replacement
Time Frame: 30 days, 6 months,1 year, and annually until 10 years
|
Comparing redo valve replacement in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days, 6 months,1 year, and annually until 10 years
|
|
Six-minute walk test
Time Frame: 30 days,6 months, and 1year
|
Comparing change in six-minute walk test in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days,6 months, and 1year
|
|
Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by KCCQ-23
Time Frame: 30 Days,6 months,1 year
|
Comparing change in KCCQ-23 in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 Days,6 months,1 year
|
|
Early safety
Time Frame: 30 days
|
Comparing early safety in TAVR with SAVR
|
30 days
|
|
Clinical efficacy
Time Frame: 1 year, and annually until 10 years
|
Comparing clinical efficacy in TAVR with SAVR
|
1 year, and annually until 10 years
|
|
Valve related long-term clinical efficacy
Time Frame: 5 years and thereafter until 10 years
|
Comparing valve related long-term clinical efficacy in TAVR with SAVR
|
5 years and thereafter until 10 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jian'an Wang, MD, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
March 5, 2026
Primary Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2029
Study Completion (Estimated)
March 1, 2038
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 1, 2026
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 1, 2026
First Posted (Actual)
March 6, 2026
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
March 10, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 6, 2026
Last Verified
February 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 20251693
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Aortic Regurgitation
-
Imperial College LondonAcademisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)UnknownHeart Valve Diseases | Aortic Valve Insufficiency | Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation | Regurgitation, AorticNetherlands
-
Beijing Anzhen HospitalNot yet recruitingAortic Stenosis | Mitral Regurgitation | Aortic Regurgitation | Tricuspid RegurgitationChina
-
Centre Chirurgical Marie LannelongueCompletedCardiac Catheterization | Cardiac Valve Disease | Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation | Paravalvular Mitral Regurgitation
-
Seung-Jung ParkCardioVascular Research Foundation, KoreaTerminatedAortic Regurgitation | Aortic Valve Insufficiency | Regurgitation, Aortic Valve | Aortic Valve | Aortic IncompetenceKorea, Republic of
-
Na Homolce HospitalCentre of Cardiovascular and Transplantation Surgery, Czech Republic; St. Anne... and other collaboratorsRecruitingAortic Valve RegurgitationSerbia, Czechia, Belgium
-
Abbott Medical DevicesActive, not recruitingParavalvular Aortic RegurgitationUnited States, Spain, Canada, Netherlands, United Kingdom, Italy, Poland
-
Columbia UniversityAmerican Heart AssociationRecruitingAortic Stenosis | Aortic Regurgitation | Valvular Heart Disease | Valve Disease, Aortic | Tricuspid Regurgitation (TR) | Mitral Regurgitation (MR)United States
-
University of LiegeRecruitingAortic Regurgitation Disease | Aortic InsufficiencyBelgium
-
IRCCS Policlinico S. DonatoRecruiting
-
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de ParisUnknownPure Aortic RegurgitationFrance
Clinical Trials on J-VALVE Transfemoral Aortic Valve system
-
JC Medical, Inc., an affiliate of Edwards Lifesciences...Not yet recruitingAortic Valve Regurgitation | Aortic Insufficiency | Aortic Valve Disease Mixed
-
RWTH Aachen UniversityCompleted
-
Boston Scientific CorporationCompleted
-
Heart Center Leipzig - University HospitalUniversity of Leipzig; Helios Health Institute GmbHRecruitingDegenerative Aortic Valve DiseaseGermany
-
Medstar Health Research InstituteCompletedAortic StenosisUnited States
-
AUSL Romagna RiminiRecruiting
-
JC Medical, Inc.Completed
-
Dr. Giuseppe MusumeciNot yet recruitingTransfemoral tranScatheter Aortic valvE ImplantationItaly
-
Catholic University of the Sacred HeartFrancesca Graziani, MD; Stefano Cangemi, MDRecruitingTranscatheter Aortic Valve Replacement | Lung Ultrasound | Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis | Pulmonary CongestionItaly
-
JC Medical, Inc., an affiliate of Edwards Lifesciences...Cardiovascular Research Foundation, New York; Minneapolis Heart Institute FoundationRecruitingAortic Valve Regurgitation | Aortic Valve Disease MixedUnited States, France, Canada, Japan, United Kingdom