ACURATE Prime XL Human Feasibility Study

June 13, 2023 updated by: Boston Scientific Corporation

A Study to Evaluate the Feasibility and Safety of the ACURATE Prime™ XL Aortic Valve System in Patients Indicated for TAVI: ACURATE Prime XL Human Feasibility Study

To evaluate feasibility and safety of the ACURATE Prime™ XL Transfemoral Aortic Valve System for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) in subjects with severe native aortic stenosis who are indicated for TAVI.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The ACURATE Prime XL Human Feasibility Study (ACURATE Prime XL HFS) is a prospective, multicenter, open-label, single-arm study designed to evaluate feasibility and safety of the ACURATE Prime XL Transfemoral Aortic Valve System for TAVI in subjects who have severe native aortic stenosis and are indicated for TAVI.

Subjects who provide written informed consent, meet all eligibility criteria, and are approved by the Case Review Committee (CRC) are considered enrolled when an attempt is made to insert the iSLEEVE Introducer into the subject's femoral artery. There will be up to 20 subjects enrolled at up to 6 centers in Australia and Europe.

All subjects implanted with a study valve will be assessed at baseline, peri- and post-procedure, at discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year. Subjects who are enrolled but not implanted with a study valve at the time of the procedure will be followed for safety through 30 days.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

13

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
        • Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
    • Queensland
      • Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, 4032
        • The Prince Charles Hospital
    • Victoria
      • Clayton, Victoria, Australia, 3168
        • Monash Health

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • IC1. Subject has documented severe symptomatic native aortic stenosis defined as follows: aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1.0 cm2 (or AVA index ≤0.6 cm2/m2) AND a mean pressure gradient ≥40 mmHg, OR maximal aortic valve velocity ≥4.0 m/s, OR Doppler velocity index ≤0.25 as measured by echocardiography and/or invasive hemodynamics. Note: In cases of low flow, low gradient aortic stenosis with left ventricular dysfunction (ejection fraction <50%), dobutamine can be used to assess the grade of aortic stenosis (maximum dobutamine dose of 20 mcg/kg/min recommended); the subject may be included in the study if echocardiographic criteria are met with this augmentation.
  • IC2. Subject has a documented aortic annulus diameter of ≥26.5 mm and ≤29 mm based on the center's assessment of pre-procedure diagnostic imaging (and confirmed by the Case Review Committee [CRC]).
  • IC3. For subjects with symptomatic aortic valve stenosis per IC1 definition above, functional status is NYHA Functional Class ≥ II.
  • IC4. Heart team (composition per local standards, but at a minimum must include an experienced cardiac surgeon) agrees that the subject is indicated for TAVI, is likely to benefit from prosthetic valve implantation, and TAVI is appropriate.
  • IC5. Subject (or legal representative) understands the study requirements and the treatment procedures and provides written informed consent.
  • IC6. Subject, family member, and/or legal representative agree(s) and subject is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits.
  • IC7. Subject is expected to be able to take the protocol-required adjunctive pharmacologic therapy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • EC1. Subject has a unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve.
  • EC2. Subject has had an acute myocardial infarction within 30 days prior to the index procedure (defined as Q-wave MI or non-Q-wave MI with total CK elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of CK MB elevation and/or troponin elevation).
  • EC3.Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack clinically confirmed by a neurologist or neuroimaging within the past 6 months prior to study enrollment.
  • EC4.Subject has eGFR < 20 mL/min (based on hospital preferred method) but is not on renal replacement therapy.
  • EC5. Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic aortic or mitral valve.
  • EC6. Subject has severe (4+) aortic, tricuspid, or mitral regurgitation.
  • EC7. Subject has moderate or severe mitral stenosis (mitral valve area ≤1.5 cm2 and diastolic pressure half-time ≥150 ms, Stage C or D).
  • EC8. Subject has a need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  • EC9. Subject has a history of endocarditis within 6 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis.
  • EC10. Subject has echocardiographic evidence of new intra-cardiac vegetation or intraventricular or paravalvular thrombus requiring intervention.
  • EC11. Subject has platelet count <50,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3, or white blood cell count <1,000 cells/mm3.
  • EC12. Subject has had a gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 3 months or has other clinically significant bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that would preclude treatment with required antiplatelet regimen or will refuse transfusions.
  • EC13. Subject has known hypersensitivity to the following:

    • Contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, OR
    • Protocol-required medications (aspirin, all P2Y12 inhibitors, heparin), OR
    • Individual components of the investigational valve and/or delivery system (stainless steel, platinum, iridium, nickel, titanium, or polyethylene terephthalate [PET]).
  • EC14. Subject has a life expectancy of less than 12 months due to non-cardiac, comorbid conditions based on the assessment of the investigator at the time of enrollment.
  • EC15. Subject has hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
  • EC16. Subject has any therapeutic invasive cardiac or vascular procedure within 30 days prior to the index procedure (except for balloon aortic valvuloplasty, pacemaker implantation, or implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation, which are allowed).
  • EC17. Subject has untreated coronary artery disease, which in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires revascularization.
  • EC18. Subject has severe left ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction <20%.
  • EC19. Subject is in cardiogenic shock or has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical support devices.
  • EC20. Subject has arterial access that is not acceptable for the study device delivery system as defined in the Instructions For Use.
  • EC21. Subject has either of the following:

    • Severe vascular disease that would preclude safe access (e.g., aneurysm with thrombus that cannot be crossed safely; marked tortuosity; significant narrowing of the abdominal aorta; severe unfolding of the thoracic aorta; or thick, protruding, ulcerated atheroma in the aortic arch), OR
    • Severe/eccentric calcification of the aortic annulus that would prevent safe implantation of the TAVI prosthesis.
  • EC22. Subject has current problems with substance abuse (e.g., alcohol, etc.) that may interfere with the subject's participation in this study.
  • EC23. Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint or subject intends to participate in another investigational device clinical trial within 12 months after the index procedure.
  • EC24. Subject has untreated conduction system disorder (e.g., Type II second degree atrioventricular block) that in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires a pacemaker implantation. Enrollment is permissible after permanent pacemaker implantation.
  • EC25. Subject has severe incapacitating dementia.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Device Feasibility
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Single arm: ACURATE Prime XL Transfemoral Aortic Valve System
Subjects who provide written informed consent, meet all eligibility criteria, and are approved by the Case Review Committee (CRC) will be implanted with ACURATE Prime XL Transfemoral Aortic Valve using iSLEEVE, ACURATE Prime XL Delivery System and ACURATE Prime XL Loading kit
ACURATE Prime™ Transfemoral Aortic Valve system: Support frame made of nitinol, supra-annular processed tri-leaflet porcine pericardial valve and an outer skirt to limit paravalvular regurgitation (manufactured by Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with Device Success
Time Frame: Through discharge or 7 days post procedure
Absence of procedural mortality, AND Correct positioning of a single valve into the proper anatomical location, AND Intended performance of the study device (indexed effective orifice area [iEOA] >0.85 cm2/m2 for BMI <30 kg/m2 and iEOA >0.70 cm2/m2 for BMI ≥30 kg/m2 plus either a mean aortic valve gradient <20 mmHg or a peak velocity <3m/sec, and no moderate or severe prosthetic valve aortic regurgitation) as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory.
Through discharge or 7 days post procedure
Number of participants who died or experienced a stroke
Time Frame: Through 30 Days post procedure

Composite of all-cause mortality and all stroke

A Clinical Events Committee (CEC), independent group of physician experts will be used to evaluate all reported cases of death and stroke to determine whether they met the specific protocol definition of the event.

Through 30 Days post procedure

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants who died including all-cause, cardiovascular, and non-cardiovascular death
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants who experienced a Stroke including disabling and non-disabling
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with Myocardial infarction (MI): periprocedural (≤72 hours post index procedure) and spontaneous (>72 hours post index procedure)
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with Bleeding: life-threatening (or disabling) and major
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with Acute kidney injury based on the AKIN System Stage 3 (including renal replacement therapy) or Stage 2
Time Frame: ≤7 days post index procedure
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
≤7 days post index procedure
Number of participants with Major vascular complication
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with Repeat procedure for valve-related dysfunction (surgical or interventional therapy)
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure (New York Heart Association [NYHA] class III or IV)
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with New permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) resulting from new or worsened conduction disturbances
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with New onset of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with Coronary obstruction: periprocedural
Time Frame: ≤72 hours post index procedure
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
≤72 hours post index procedure
Number of participants with Ventricular septal perforation: periprocedural
Time Frame: ≤72 hours post index procedure
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
≤72 hours post index procedure
Number of participants with Mitral apparatus damage: periprocedural
Time Frame: ≤72 hours post index procedure
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
≤72 hours post index procedure
Number of participants with Cardiac tamponade: periprocedural
Time Frame: ≤72 hours post index procedure
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
≤72 hours post index procedure
Number of participants with Valve migration
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with Valve embolization
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with Ectopic valve deployment
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with Transcatheter aortic valve (TAV)-in-TAV deployment
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with Prosthetic aortic valve thrombosis
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with Prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee (CEC) based on VARC 2 definitions
Participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay, through 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with successful vascular access, delivery and deployment of the study valve, and successful retrieval of the delivery system (site reported assessment)
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of their procedure, an expected average of 1 day (peri- and post-procedure)
Device Performance endpoint, as measured by site reported data
Participants will be followed for the duration of their procedure, an expected average of 1 day (peri- and post-procedure)
Grade of aortic regurgitation/paravalvular leak (PVL) (echocardiographic assessment)
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of their procedure, an expected average of 1 day (peri- and post-procedure)
Device Performance endpoint, as assessed by Echocardiographic Core Laboratory
Participants will be followed for the duration of their procedure, an expected average of 1 day (peri- and post-procedure)
Prosthetic aortic valve performance: Effective Orifice Area (EOA)
Time Frame: Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Effective Orifice Area (EOA), as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Prosthetic aortic valve performance: Mean Aortic Gradient
Time Frame: Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Mean aortic gradient as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Prosthetic aortic valve performance: Peak Aortic Gradient
Time Frame: Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Peak Aortic Gradient as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Prosthetic aortic valve performance: Peak Aortic Velocity
Time Frame: Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Peak Aortic Velocity as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Prosthetic aortic valve performance: Grade of Aortic Regurgitation/PVL
Time Frame: Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Grade of Aortic Regurgitation/PVL as measured by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and assessed by an independent core laboratory
Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Number of participants with a New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Status classification of Class I, II, III or IV
Time Frame: Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Evaluated by New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification
Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year
Neurological status: Participant score for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) assessment
Time Frame: Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first) and 1 year and when is stroke is suspected
Evaluated by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) - Minimum: 0 (No stroke symptoms); Max: 21-42 (Severe stroke)
Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first) and 1 year and when is stroke is suspected
Neurological status: Participant score for Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) Assessment
Time Frame: Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year, and when is stroke is suspected (and 90 days post stroke)
Evaluated by Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) - min: 0 (The patient has no residual symptoms); max: 6 (The patient has expired)
Discharge or 7 days post index procedure (whichever comes first), 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year, and when is stroke is suspected (and 90 days post stroke)
Neurological status: Number of participants with a confirmed stroke per Neurological physical exam assessment
Time Frame: Participants will be followed for the duration of the trial, through 1 year
Evaluated per neurological physical exam in all subjects where stroke is suspected
Participants will be followed for the duration of the trial, through 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Robert Gooley, MBBS, Monash Medical Centre

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 3, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 16, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

May 24, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 4, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 17, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

February 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 15, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 13, 2023

Last Verified

June 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

IPD Plan Description

The data and study protocol for this clinical trial may be made available to other researchers in accordance with the Boston Scientific Data Sharing Policy (http://www.bostonscientific.com/en-US/data-sharing-requests.html)

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Aortic Stenosis

Clinical Trials on ACURATE Prime XL Transfemoral Aortic Valve System

Subscribe