Intrscalene Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery

December 19, 2022 updated by: rehab zayed, Alexandria University

Comparing Postoperative Analgesic Efficiency of Intrscalene Block Versus Pericapsular Nerve Group Block for Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

Early postoperative pain after arthroscopic shoulder surgery is a major problem for patients and orthopedic surgeons. Adequate pain control is vital for all aspects of patient recovery; including mental state, nutrition, cost of care period, rehabilitation, patient satisfaction, and overall post-surgery outcomes. (1) Single analgesic regimens are not always effective in controlling moderate to severe postoperative pain. Therefore, multimodal pain management is preferred and is currently recommended for early postoperative pain control.(2) Regional techniques form an integral part of multimodal analgesia of most of the enhanced recovery protocols and aid in minimizing the requirements of opioids to control acute postoperative pain which results in better, faster recovery and better satisfaction. Also, it is well known that sufficient management of acute pain is essential to prevent its transition to chronic pain.(3) The use of ultrasound guidance and its incorporation into the practice of regional anesthesia has dramatically improved the safety and success of perioperative care.(4) Ultrasound guided regional anesthesia is preferred in shoulder surgery as an effective way to provide anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. To ensure adequate postoperative pain control, nerve supply to the synovium, capsule, joint surfaces, ligaments, periosteum and shoulder muscles must be blocked.

Interscalene brachial plexus (ISB) block is considered the analgesic technique of choice for shoulder surgery. However, the hemi-diaphragmatic paresis that may occur after the block has led to the search for an alternative to the ISB block. (5) Pericapsular nerve group block (PENG) is a new block that provides a pericapsular distribution with local anesthetic infiltration around the glenohumeral joint and provides analgesia by reaching the sensory nerve branches of the glenohumeral joint. The block of this area did not cause motor block or pulmonary complications, nor result in muscle laxity, blocking only the shoulder and the upper third of the humerus. It was demonstrated that the PENG block may be safely applied for both partial anesthesia and analgesia.(6)

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

80

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Alexandria, Egypt, 000000
        • Recruiting
        • Rehab A. Abd El-Aziz
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA physical status class I - II
  • patient who will be scheduled for an elective unilateral arthroscopic shoulder surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with respiratory disease, renal or hepatic insufficiency,
  • infection of the skin in the puncture area,
  • coagulopathy,
  • allergy against any of the drugs to be used (bupivacaine),
  • neuromuscular disease,
  • obesity (body mass index, BMI >30),
  • previous analgesic medication, chronic pain, and previously known neurological pathologies or central nervous system disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 1. Interscalene group
Patients received ipsilateral ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve after induction of general anesthesia using bupivacaine 0.25% (0.5 mL/kg).
  1. Interscalene group: Patients received ipsilateral ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve after induction of general anesthesia using bupivacaine 0.25% (0.5 mL/kg).
  2. PENG Block: Patients received ultrasound-guided PENG block after induction of general anesthesia using bupivacaine 0.25% (0.5 mL/kg).
Active Comparator: 2. PENG Block
Patients received ultrasound-guided PENG block after induction of general anesthesia using bupivacaine 0.25% (0.5 mL/kg).
  1. Interscalene group: Patients received ipsilateral ultrasound-guided interscalene nerve after induction of general anesthesia using bupivacaine 0.25% (0.5 mL/kg).
  2. PENG Block: Patients received ultrasound-guided PENG block after induction of general anesthesia using bupivacaine 0.25% (0.5 mL/kg).

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
visual analogue scale
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperative
visual analogue scale to assess the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided intrscalene block versus PENG Block
24 hours postoperative

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 19, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0305847

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Rotator Cuff

Clinical Trials on Interscalene versus PENG Block

Subscribe