Comparison Between Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block and Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Postoperative Analgesia Following Shoulder Arthroscopy

February 1, 2024 updated by: Mohamed Sabry B Mohamed, Ain Shams University

Comparison Between Ultrasound Guided Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block and Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block for Postoperative Analgesia Following Shoulder Arthroscopy: Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

The study aimed to compare ultrasound guided pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block versus interscalene brachial plexus block for postoperative analgesia following shoulder arthroscopy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Shoulder arthroscopy can effectively treat a number of injuries and diseases of the shoulder on an ambulatory basis. Although shoulder arthroscopy is considered minimally invasive, it is related to severe postoperative pain. The use of arthroscopy is popular because it decreases pain, shortens hospital stay, and improves patient satisfaction. However, immediate postoperative pain remains to be a problem in more than 40% of patients.

Regional anesthesia, especially peripheral nerve blocks have various advantages like decreased need for postoperative analgesics, decreased incidence of nausea and vomiting, shortened recovery time and hospital stay, Early ambulation and discharge.

Interscalene brachial plexus (ISB) block is considered the gold standard technique for pain management in shoulder surgery as it provides the most reliable analgesia. However, it has the potential for many complications. The most common of these complications is phrenic nerve palsy, which is reversible but may result in significant respiratory distress especially in patients with compromised respiratory function. Other less common yet serious complications include Horner's syndrome, recurrent laryngeal nerve block that may result in hoarseness of voice, vascular puncture, brachial plexus neuropathy, and unintended injection of local anesthetic into the subarachnoid space, epidural space, or vertebral artery.

Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block is a new block that provides a pericapsular distribution with local anesthetic infiltration around the glenohumeral joint and provides analgesia by reaching the sensory nerve branches of the glenohumeral joint.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

50

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Cairo, Egypt, 11591
        • Recruiting
        • Ain Shams University
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Hoda O Mahmoud, Professor
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Amin M Al-ansary, Ass-prof
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • George M Khalil, Ass-prof
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Ramy M Hassan, MD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Age from 18 to 60 years old. - Both genders. - BMI ≤35 kg/m2. - American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) Class I and II. - Patient who will be scheduled for an elective unilateral arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Refusal of procedure or participation in the study
  • Patient under age of 18 years old or above 60 years' old
  • Physical status: ASA-PS III or above.
  • Pregnancy or lactation.
  • Infection at site of injection.
  • Psychiatric illness.
  • CNS Diseases like (epilepsy, stroke …etc.) or neurological disease affecting patient's upper limb.
  • Evidence of coagulopathy or anticoagulation.
  • Patients with respiratory disease, renal or hepatic insufficiency.
  • infection of the skin in the puncture area.
  • Allergy against any of the drugs to be used.
  • Obesity (BMI >35 kg/m2).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Group A (Control Group
Patients will receive ultrasound guided Interscalene brachial plexus (ISB) block after induction of general anesthesia.

Patients will receive ultrasound guided interscalene brachial plexus block after induction of general anesthesia.

Scanning with SonoSite M-Turbo C ® Ultrasound device with HFL - 38 X Linear probe (Japan) with high frequency (6 -13 MHz) will be started just below the level of the cricoid cartilage medial to the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

the transducer will be moved slightly laterally across the neck to identify the scalene muscles and the brachial plexus that is present between the anterior and middle scalene muscles at the level of the sixth cervical vertebra deep to the sternocleidomastoid muscle.

The needle will be then inserted in-plane toward the brachial plexus, in a lateral-to-medial direction.

After negative aspiration and assurance that high resistance to injection is absent, 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride will be injected in a 5-ml increment below the lower root, between the 3 roots, and above the upper root.(Total amount is 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride).

Experimental: Group B (Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block)
Patients will receive ultrasound guided Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block after induction of general anesthesia

Patients will receive ultrasound guided Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block after induction of general anesthesia.

Using SonoSite M-Turbo C ® Ultrasound device with HFL - 38 X Linear probe (Japan) with high frequency (6 -13 MHz) ,A linear ultrasound probe will be placed longitudinally between the coracoid and the humeral head.

After defining the humeral head, the tendon of the subscapular muscle and the deltoid muscle over it, a 50-mm needle will be inserted using the ''in plane'' technique. When the needle pass through the deltoid muscle and touched the subscapularis tendon, a bone-like hard tissue will be felt and the needle can't be advanced further.

The needle tip will be placed between the deltoid muscle and subscapularis tendon, after a careful aspiration, 15 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine hydrochloride will be injected.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
First time for requiring analgesia
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
First time for requiring analgesia. It will be defined as the time from recovery until VAS score greater than 3.
24 hours postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total amount of pethidine consumption in the first 24 hours
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
If the patient complained of pain, intravenous pethidine sulfate will be (50mg/dose) to be repeated on demand (VAS is > 3) provided that the total 24-hour dosage not to exceed 50 mg every 6 hours.
24 hours postoperatively
The degree of pain
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
The degree of pain will be measured using visual analogue scale (VAS)ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 no pain and 10 maximum pain. It will be evaluated on arrival to PACU (T0) then at 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively.
24 hours postoperatively
Complications
Time Frame: 24 hours postoperatively
Any complications during and after the performance of the block - for example, pneumothorax, Horner's syndrome, hoarseness of voice, difficulty in breathing, weakness, and paresthesia in the arm will be recorded.
24 hours postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 20, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

February 1, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

February 2, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2024

Last Verified

February 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • FMASU MD298/2023

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author after the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

After the end of study for one year.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will be available upon a reasonable request from the corresponding author.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Shoulder Arthroscopy

Clinical Trials on Control Group (Interscalene brachial plexus block)

Subscribe