Investigation of the Effects of Balance Discs With Different Surfaces Used in Balance Education in Children With Cerebral Palsy on Proprioceptive Sense and Balance.

January 10, 2023 updated by: İlkan Cicek, Mustafa Kemal University

Investigation of the Effects of Balance Discs With Different Surfaces Used in Balance Education in Children With Cerebral Palsy

This is a non-invasive prospective study investigating the effects of balance discs with different surfaces used in balance education in children with cerebral palsy on proprioceptive sense and balance.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Many methods are used for balance training. One of them is balance discs. Balance discs consist of smooth and rough surfaces. Balance training is given to children with cerebral palsy on these two surfaces. Thanks to its balance disc structure, it plays an active role in the development of balance, but there is a need for evidence about whether rough or smooth surfaces and training have superiority over each other. Knowing the difference between the two surfaces will help the staff about which surface to use in the treatment and will be beneficial for the children.

The aim of this study is to determine whether there is a difference between a rough and smooth surface in terms of improving proprioceptive sense and balance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

16

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Hatay
      • Antakya, Hatay, Turkey, 31000
        • Recruiting
        • Hatay Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Yılmaz Akbaş, doctoral lecturer

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with cerebral palsy
  • Diagnosed with motor developmental delay
  • 0-12 years old
  • Levels 1 and 2 according to GMFCS
  • Having bilateral and unilaterally affected spastic type CP
  • Cooperate with assessments

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Botulinum toxin administration in the last 6 months
  • Having had any surgical operation in the last 6 months
  • Having dyskinetic, ataxic and hypotonic type CP
  • Unable to cooperate with assessments

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Spiky balance disc study group
Bobath therapy will be studied with the children in this group and balance training will be given on the rough (spiky) surface of the extra balance disc.
Bobath therapy
Balance discs consist of smooth and rough surface. Balance training is given to children with cerebral palsy on these two surfaces. Thanks to its balance disc structure, it plays an active role in the development of balance.
Experimental: Smooth balance disc study group
Bobath therapy will be studied with the children in this group and balance training will be given on the smooth (flat) surface of the extra balance disc.
Bobath therapy
Balance discs consist of smooth and rough surface. Balance training is given to children with cerebral palsy on these two surfaces. Thanks to its balance disc structure, it plays an active role in the development of balance.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pediatric Berg balance test:
Time Frame: baseline and week 10
The Pediatric Berg Balance Test is a modified version of the Berg Balance Test used to assess functional balance skills in school-aged children.Patients are evaluated out of 56 points, with the highest score being 56. Change will be evaluated
baseline and week 10
Change in Functional reach test
Time Frame: baseline and week 10
The Functional Reach Test is a clinical outcome measurement and assessment tool to detect dynamic balance in a single simple task. While standing, it measures the distance between the length of an extended arm at maximum forward reach while maintaining a stable base of support.Change will be evaluated.
baseline and week 10
Change in One-leg standing test
Time Frame: baseline and week 10
The one-leg stance test is a test in which the time to stand on balance is measured on the right and left extremities of the patient, and evaluates the static balance. Change will be evaluated.
baseline and week 10
Change in Proprioceptive sensory test:
Time Frame: baseline and week 10

Active and passive repositioning test will be used to evaluate ankle proprioceptive sensation.

Passive repositioning: The person to be tested is asked to learn that position by positioning the joint at a certain angle. Then, while the joint is moved passively, the person is asked to stop the movement when it reaches the previously learned position. The numerical difference between the angle found by the person and the angle taught before is evaluated.

Active repositioning: The person is asked to find the position taught to the person by moving their extremity, and the numerical difference is determined.Change will be evaluated.

baseline and week 10

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
height
Time Frame: baseline
Children's height will be measured in cm with a tape measure.
baseline
weight
Time Frame: baseline
Their weight will be measured with precision scales and indicated in kg.
baseline
body mass index
Time Frame: baseline
Body mass index will be stated as kilo/meter*2.
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

December 5, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

January 9, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 15, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 3, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 9, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 11, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cerebral Palsy

Clinical Trials on Pediatric neurodevelopmental therapy

Subscribe