Outcome of Failed and Neglected Terrible Triad Injury of the Elbow

January 15, 2023 updated by: Mo'men Moustafa Mohamed Saber, Assiut University

Outcome of Reconstruction of Failed and Neglected Terrible Triad Injury of the Elbow

The aim of the study is to evaluate the results of reconstruction of neglected and failed cases of terrible triad of the elbow

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

A terrible triad injury consists of posterior dislocation of the elbow associated with a radial head fracture and a coronoid fracture. This injury occurs during a fall onto an outstretched arm, and it presents a disruption of the bony and capsuloligamentous structures from the lateral side, which progresses anteriorly and medially.The primary goal of surgical treatment for terrible triad injury is to restore elbow function with. good stability. The current standard treatment involves internal fixation and reconstruction of the bony and ligamentous structures to allow early mobilization. Fixation or replacement of radial head fractures and lateral ligament reconstruction represent the main operative procedures. A biomechanical and clinical study showed that restoration of the coronoid process and anterior capsule is an important step for a stable elbow. old "terrible triad" of elbow with no operative history is difficult to treat. The elbow's functions and stabilization can be recovered by thorough elbow release, repair of coronoid process and anterior capsule, radial head fixation or replacment reconstruction or repaire of, lateral collateral ligament and reinsertion of the common extensor tendon, combined with hinged external fixator Although improved knowledge of this injury has yielded favourable clinical outcomes, complications continue to occur, including stiffness, recurrent subluxation or dislocation, heterotopic ossification, ulnar nerve neuropathy, and arthritis.The common causes of revision after terrible triad injury reconstruction are stiffness and recurrent instability, Stiffness and instability, among all these complications, are indeed the most recurring. A stiff or unstable elbow is very poorly tolerated because of the lack of compensatory motion in adjacent joints, So it's very important to detect causes and risk factors that leading to fail terrible triad reconstruction.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

15 years to 70 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

• All cases fulfilling the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria admitted to Assuit university over two year from the beginning of the study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Age from 15 to 70 years' old

    • Neglected cases more than 4 weeks
    • Early failed cases whom had any intervention whether conservative treatment as cast or hinged elbow brace etc or operative and still complaining of instability of the elbow. In less than 6 weeks
    • Late Failed cases whom had any intervention whether conservative treatment as cast or hinged elbow brace etc or operative and still complaining of instability of the elbow after more than 6 weeks .

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Older than 70 years old and younger than 15 years old

    • Nerve injury
    • Associated soft tissue loss
    • Patients needs Total Elbow Replacement or Arthrodesis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The final end results will be assessed according to degree of improvement according to DASH score performance index
Time Frame: DASH score assessment preoperative and at 4,8 weeks 6 months and 1 year postoperative.Follow up:2 weeks postoperative for stitches removal, 6 weeks by x ray to assess reunion, 3 and 6 months by x ray to assess reunion.1 year by MSCT to assess reunion
The final end results will be assessed according to degree of improvement according to DASH score performance index (The disability of the arm, shoulder and hand)(is an upper-extremity specific outcome measure that was introduced by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons in collaboration with a number of other organizations)(The main part of the DASH is a 30-item disability/symptom scale concerning the patient's health status during the preceding week. The items ask about the degree of difficulty in performing different physical activities because of the arm, shoulder, or hand problem (21 items), the severity of each of the symptoms of pain, activity-related pain, tingling, weakness and stiffness (5 items), as well as the problem's impact on social activities, work, sleep, and self-image (4 items). Each item has five response options. The scores for all items are then used to calculate a scale score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
DASH score assessment preoperative and at 4,8 weeks 6 months and 1 year postoperative.Follow up:2 weeks postoperative for stitches removal, 6 weeks by x ray to assess reunion, 3 and 6 months by x ray to assess reunion.1 year by MSCT to assess reunion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Aly Mohamden Mohamed, Professor, Assiut University
  • Study Director: Waleed Riad Saleh, Professor, Assiut University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

March 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

October 30, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 15, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 18, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Outcome of elbow injury

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Elbow Injury

Subscribe