- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05687734
Outcome of Failed and Neglected Terrible Triad Injury of the Elbow
January 15, 2023 updated by: Mo'men Moustafa Mohamed Saber, Assiut University
Outcome of Reconstruction of Failed and Neglected Terrible Triad Injury of the Elbow
The aim of the study is to evaluate the results of reconstruction of neglected and failed cases of terrible triad of the elbow
Study Overview
Status
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
A terrible triad injury consists of posterior dislocation of the elbow associated with a radial head fracture and a coronoid fracture.
This injury occurs during a fall onto an outstretched arm, and it presents a disruption of the bony and capsuloligamentous structures from the lateral side, which progresses anteriorly and medially.The primary goal of surgical treatment for terrible triad injury is to restore elbow function with.
good stability.
The current standard treatment involves internal fixation and reconstruction of the bony and ligamentous structures to allow early mobilization.
Fixation or replacement of radial head fractures and lateral ligament reconstruction represent the main operative procedures.
A biomechanical and clinical study showed that restoration of the coronoid process and anterior capsule is an important step for a stable elbow.
old "terrible triad" of elbow with no operative history is difficult to treat.
The elbow's functions and stabilization can be recovered by thorough elbow release, repair of coronoid process and anterior capsule, radial head fixation or replacment reconstruction or repaire of, lateral collateral ligament and reinsertion of the common extensor tendon, combined with hinged external fixator Although improved knowledge of this injury has yielded favourable clinical outcomes, complications continue to occur, including stiffness, recurrent subluxation or dislocation, heterotopic ossification, ulnar nerve neuropathy, and arthritis.The common causes of revision after terrible triad injury reconstruction are stiffness and recurrent instability, Stiffness and instability, among all these complications, are indeed the most recurring.
A stiff or unstable elbow is very poorly tolerated because of the lack of compensatory motion in adjacent joints, So it's very important to detect causes and risk factors that leading to fail terrible triad reconstruction.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Anticipated)
40
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Momen Moustafa Mohamed, specialist
- Phone Number: +201141130033
- Email: momenmoustafa87@gmail.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Ayman Farouk Abdelkawi, Lecturer
- Phone Number: +201005460273
- Email: aymanfaaa@aun.edu.eg
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
15 years to 70 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
N/A
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
• All cases fulfilling the Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria admitted to Assuit university over two year from the beginning of the study.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
• Age from 15 to 70 years' old
- Neglected cases more than 4 weeks
- Early failed cases whom had any intervention whether conservative treatment as cast or hinged elbow brace etc or operative and still complaining of instability of the elbow. In less than 6 weeks
- Late Failed cases whom had any intervention whether conservative treatment as cast or hinged elbow brace etc or operative and still complaining of instability of the elbow after more than 6 weeks .
Exclusion Criteria:
• Older than 70 years old and younger than 15 years old
- Nerve injury
- Associated soft tissue loss
- Patients needs Total Elbow Replacement or Arthrodesis
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
The final end results will be assessed according to degree of improvement according to DASH score performance index
Time Frame: DASH score assessment preoperative and at 4,8 weeks 6 months and 1 year postoperative.Follow up:2 weeks postoperative for stitches removal, 6 weeks by x ray to assess reunion, 3 and 6 months by x ray to assess reunion.1 year by MSCT to assess reunion
|
The final end results will be assessed according to degree of improvement according to DASH score performance index (The disability of the arm, shoulder and hand)(is an upper-extremity specific outcome measure that was introduced by the American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons in collaboration with a number of other organizations)(The main part of the DASH is a 30-item disability/symptom scale concerning the patient's health status during the preceding week.
The items ask about the degree of difficulty in performing different physical activities because of the arm, shoulder, or hand problem (21 items), the severity of each of the symptoms of pain, activity-related pain, tingling, weakness and stiffness (5 items), as well as the problem's impact on social activities, work, sleep, and self-image (4 items).
Each item has five response options.
The scores for all items are then used to calculate a scale score ranging from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
|
DASH score assessment preoperative and at 4,8 weeks 6 months and 1 year postoperative.Follow up:2 weeks postoperative for stitches removal, 6 weeks by x ray to assess reunion, 3 and 6 months by x ray to assess reunion.1 year by MSCT to assess reunion
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Study Director: Aly Mohamden Mohamed, Professor, Assiut University
- Study Director: Waleed Riad Saleh, Professor, Assiut University
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Kachooei AR, Mellema JJ, Tarabochia MA, Chen N, van Dijk CN, Ring D. Involvement of the lesser sigmoid notch in elbow fracture dislocations. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2016 Oct;25(10):1571-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2016.02.013. Epub 2016 May 24.
- Giannicola G, Calella P, Piccioli A, Scacchi M, Gumina S. Terrible triad of the elbow: is it still a troublesome injury? Injury. 2015 Dec;46 Suppl 8:S68-76. doi: 10.1016/S0020-1383(15)30058-9.
- Zhang J, Tan M, Kwek EBK. Outcomes of coronoid-first repair in terrible triad injuries of the elbow. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2017 Sep;137(9):1239-1245. doi: 10.1007/s00402-017-2733-8. Epub 2017 Jun 20.
- Fitzgibbons PG, Louie D, Dyer GS, Blazar P, Earp B. Functional outcomes after fixation of "terrible triad" elbow fracture dislocations. Orthopedics. 2014 Apr;37(4):e373-6. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20140401-59.
- Ritali A, Rotini R, Cavallo M, Marinelli A, Guerra E. Instability/stiffness in elbow fracture dislocation. Lo Scalpello-Journal. 2020 Mar 22;34:30-5.
- Sun Z, Li J, Luo G, Wang F, Hu Y, Fan C. What constitutes a clinically important change in Mayo Elbow Performance Index and range of movement after open elbow arthrolysis? Bone Joint J. 2021 Feb;103-B(2):366-372. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.103B2.BJJ-2020-0259.R3.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Anticipated)
March 1, 2023
Primary Completion (Anticipated)
October 30, 2024
Study Completion (Anticipated)
December 30, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 15, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 15, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
January 18, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 18, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 15, 2023
Last Verified
January 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- Outcome of elbow injury
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Elbow Injury
-
Mayo ClinicCompletedElbow InjuryUnited States
-
University of ChicagoCompletedElbow Fracture | Elbow InjuryUnited States
-
Hospital Universitario La PazActive, not recruitingElbow Fracture | Elbow Arthropathy | Elbow Injury | Elbow Dislocation | Elbow Fractures Involving a Combination of Fractures of the Radius and UlnSpain
-
Zimmer BiometEnrolling by invitation
-
Western University, CanadaLawson Health Research InstituteNot yet recruitingElbow Fracture | Elbow Injury | Elbow Arthritis
-
Beijing Jishuitan HospitalNot yet recruitingCartilage Defect | Elbow InjuryChina
-
Cairo UniversityRecruitingElbow InjuriesEgypt
-
University of CalgaryUnited States Department of DefenseCompletedElbow Fracture | Elbow Injury | Elbow DislocationCanada, United States
-
University of Sao PauloCompletedElbow Joint Contracture | Elbow Osteoarthritis | Elbow Injury | Elbow Flexion ContracturesBrazil
-
Karen L. Andrews, M.D.University of Pisa; Arizona State UniversityCompletedUpper Limb Amputation Below Elbow (Injury)