Rehabilitation on Equal Terms - The ReMig Study

May 30, 2023 updated by: Lund University

Rehabilitation on Equal Terms - A Study Focusing on Recovery and Mortality of Migrated Women With Breast Cancer: The ReMig Study

The ReMig-study aims to increase knowledge about rehabilitation needs, the rehabilitation process of arabic-speaking migrated women with BC, to increase the prerequisites for optimized and equal cancer care. The study aims to map migrated Arabic-speaking women's breast cancer rehabilitation with a focus on mental and physical recovery, lifestyle habits as well as satisfaction and goals with the rehabilitation and compare these outcomes with the outcomes of Swedish-speaking women. Further aim is to explore migrated Arabic-speaking women´s experiences and attitudes towards breast cancer rehabilitation.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Annually, over 2 million women are diagnosed with breast cancer (BC) globally, of which about 8300 in Sweden. Today, 20% of the Swedish population is foreign born and previous research has shown that women who have migrated are particularly vulnerable when diagnosed with BC. Research focusing on migrated women is sparse as they are often excluded from research, but available research shows that experience and management of BC differs depending on ethnicity, that the women to a lesser extent participate in BC screening and rehabilitation and that they have a higher mortality than Swedish born women. In recent years, measures to promote early BC diagnosis have been initiated, but knowledge of how optimized rehabilitation should be ensured to promote recovery and reduce the socioeconomic burden is lacking.

This study aims to map the rehabilitation of migrant Arabic-speaking women with a focus on mental and physical recovery, lifestyle habits and satisfaction and goals with the rehabilitation in the first year after BC diagnosis and compare these outcomes with Swedish-speaking women. Further to elucidate migrated Arabic-speaking women´s experiences and attitudes towards breast cancer rehabilitation.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

140

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Lund, Sweden, 221 00
        • Recruiting
        • Lund University, Skåne university hospital, Helsingborgs sjukhus
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Annette EW Holst-Hansson, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Participants are planned to be recruited at breast cancer clinics in southern Sweden. The selection is coming to consist of Arabic-speaking women, ≤18 years of age who have migrated to Sweden and who have been diagnosed with BC (N=140). To this data comes a matched sample with data for Swedish-speaking women from the ReScreen study (dnr 201/505) to be used as a basis for the comparative analyses.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergone treatment for primary breast cancer
  • ≤18 years old
  • Ability to communicate in the Arabic language
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Recurrent disease
  • Palliative diagnosis
  • Pregnancy
  • Prior history of breast cancer
  • Inability to participate in the study due to cognitive impairment

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Psychological Distress
Time Frame: 1 week pre-operative, after surgery at 2 weeks, 3 ,6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.
Psychological Distress measured by the "Distress thermometer". A instrument that the patients answer themselves measuring the level of distress and the potential problems the may have.
1 week pre-operative, after surgery at 2 weeks, 3 ,6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.
General Quality of life
Time Frame: 1 week pre-operative, after surgery at 2 weeks, 3 ,6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.

The instrument EORTC Core Quality of Life questionnaire (QLQ-C30), developed by the EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) and measures quality of life. The QLQ-C30 is composed of both multi-item scales and single-item measures (total 28 questions)

, including. five functional scales, three symptom scales, a global health status / QoL scale, and six single items. Each of the multi-item scales includes a different set of items - no item occurs in more than one scale. All of the scales and single-item measures transforms to range in score from 0 to 100. A high scale score represents a higher response level, which means that a high score for a functional scale represents a high / healthy level of functioning, a high score for the global health status / QoL represents a high QoL, but a high score for a symptom scale / item represents a high level of symptomatology / problems.

1 week pre-operative, after surgery at 2 weeks, 3 ,6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.
Breast cancer specific quality of life
Time Frame: 1 week pre-operative, after surgery at 2 weeks, 3 ,6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.
The instrument QLQ-BR23 is developed by the EORTC (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer) and measures diagnose specific quality of life. The QLQ-BR23 includes five multi-item scales to assess body image, sexual functioning, systemic therapy side effects, breast symptoms, and arm symptoms. Additionally, single items assess sexual enjoyment, future perspective and being upset by hair loss. The range in score from 0 to 100. A high score for the functional scales represents a high/healthy level of functioning, while a high score for the symptom scales represents a high level of symptomatology or problems.
1 week pre-operative, after surgery at 2 weeks, 3 ,6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.
Resilience
Time Frame: 1 week pre-operative, after surgery at 2 weeks, 3 ,6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.
Connor-Davidson Resilience scale (CD-RISC) will be used to measure patients resilience trough 25 questions ranging from 0-4. Lower scores indicates more problems. Scoring of the scale CD-RISC-25 is based on summing the total of all items, each of which is scored from 0-4, the full range is from 0 to 100, with higher scores reflecting greater resilience.
1 week pre-operative, after surgery at 2 weeks, 3 ,6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.
Body mass index
Time Frame: 1 week pre-operative, 6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.
Body mass index, based on weight (in kilograms) and height (in meters). Weight and height will be combined to report BMI in kg/m^2. Height will be reported only at baseline (eg. 1 week pre-operative) and weight at baseline (1 week pre-operative), 6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative.
1 week pre-operative, 6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.
Working status/sick leave
Time Frame: 1 week pre-operative,after surgery at 2 weeks, 3 ,6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.
Sick leave may indicate that the woman experience more complications of the surgery or /and cancer treatment. Follow-up question regarding the extent in percent of the sickleave.
1 week pre-operative,after surgery at 2 weeks, 3 ,6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.
Physical activity/life style
Time Frame: 1 week pre-operative,after surgery at 2 weeks, 3 ,6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.
Four questions regarding life style and physical activity. The questions is about the amount of time per week the woman is performing physical activity with high intensity, performing physical activity with low intensity, the grade of physical strenuous of work or daily activities and the hours spent sedentary. The answer options is given in minutes from 0 up to more than 300 minutes for physical activity respectively from 0 minutes to more than 8 hours for time spent sedentary.
1 week pre-operative,after surgery at 2 weeks, 3 ,6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.
Rehabilitation process
Time Frame: After surgery at 6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.
Questions regarding the experiences of the rehabilitation process, the extent of information, the extent of participation in decisions regarding rehabilitation,support from healthcare and the satisfaction of recovery and rehabilitation. The answer options range from not at all to a very high extent.
After surgery at 6 ,9 and 12 months postoperative. Evaluating change over time.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 24, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 20, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

May 15, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 31, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 30, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ReMig

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Subscribe