Psychosocial Mobile App for Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease

November 16, 2025 updated by: El-Jawahri, Areej,M.D., Massachusetts General Hospital

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Psychosocial Mobile Application (App) to Promote Coping for Patients With Chronic Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD)

The purpose of this research study is to see whether a psychosocial mobile app called Horizons is effective at improving quality of life, symptom burden, psychological distress, and coping in patients living with chronic graft-versus host disease (GVHD)

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Frequently patients living with chronic GVHD experience physical and emotional symptoms during the course of illness that impacts their quality of life. Patients also often report difficulty managing many of the tasks they need to do to manage their chronic GVHD. They also frequently have a lot of questions about chronic GVHD and the expected trajectory of this illness.

The purpose of this research study is to see whether a psychosocial mobile app called Horizons is effective at improving quality of life, symptom burden, and psychological distress in patients with chronic GVHD

  • This study will randomly assign participants to either receiving Horizons plus usual care or usual care alone.
  • Enrolled participants will be on the research study for up to sixteen weeks and it is expected that about 120 people will take part in this research study.

The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society is supporting this research by providing funding.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Massachusetts
      • Boston, Massachusetts, United States, 02215
        • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients (≥18 years) who underwent allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT).
  • Have moderate to severe chronic GVHD based on their oncology clinician assessment as documented in the Electronic Health Record.
  • Ability to comprehend and speak English as the HORIZONs app is only available in English.

Exclusion Criteria:

-Patients with acute or unstable psychiatric or cognitive conditions which the treating clinicians believes prohibits informed consent or compliance with study procedures.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Horizons mobile app

Participants randomly assigned to the Horizons group, will use the Horizons app over an eight-week period in addition to receiving usual care from transplant team.

Participants will complete study questionnaires at the time of enrollment (baseline) and at eight and sixteen weeks after enrollment

HORIZONS is self-administered with several features to promote engagement and health behavior change including gamification strategies, videos of chronic GVHD survivors, and optional content.

HORIZONS includes five interactive modules to be completed during an eight week period. HORIZONS also includes a sixth optional helpful resources section with a review of the domains and skills covered in the first five modules

Active Comparator: Usual Care

Participant in the usual care group will receive usual care from the transplant oncology team including all the supportive care measures implemented by the transplant oncology team.

Participants will complete study questionnaires at the time of enrollment (baseline) nad at eight and sixteen weeks after enrollment

Patients in the usual care group will receive usual care from the transplant oncology team including all the supportive care measures implemented by the transplant oncology team.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life (QOL): Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT)
Time Frame: 8 Weeks
Compare patient QOL (FACT-BMT) between usual care and Horizon at 8 weeks using ANCOVA. FACT-BMT score range 0-164, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
8 Weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Quality of life (QOL) longitudinal using FACT-BMT
Time Frame: Up to sixteen weeks
Compare patient QOL (FACT-BMT) longitudinally between Horizons and usual care group using mixed linear effect models. FACT-BMT score range 0-164, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Up to sixteen weeks
Anxiety symptoms using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-Anxiety)
Time Frame: up to sixteen weeks
Compare anxiety symptoms (HADS-Anxiety) between study groups. The HADS anxiety subscale range from 0-21 with higher scores indicating worse anxiety symptoms
up to sixteen weeks
Depression symptoms using HADS-Depression
Time Frame: up to sixteen weeks
Compare depression symptoms (HADS-depression) between study groups. The HADS depression subscale range from 0-21 with higher scores indicating worse depression symptoms
up to sixteen weeks
Chronic GVHD symptom burden (Lee Scale)
Time Frame: up to sixteen weeks
compare chronic GVHD symptom burden (Lee Scale) between the study groups. The Lee Scale ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating worse symptom burden
up to sixteen weeks

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Self-efficacy (PROMIS self-efficacy scale)
Time Frame: up to sixteen weeks
Compare self-efficacy (PROMIS-self-efficacy scale) between the study groups. The PROMIS self-efficacy for managing symptoms scale ranges from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better self-efficacy
up to sixteen weeks
patient coping using Measure of Current Status (MOCS)
Time Frame: up to sixteen weeks
Comparing coping (MOCS) between study groups (MOCS score range 0-52, with higher scores indicating greater coping skill).
up to sixteen weeks
social support using Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS SSS)
Time Frame: up to sixteen weeks
Compare patient social support (MOS SSS) between study groups. MOS SSS score range 0-100, with higher scores indicating greater support.
up to sixteen weeks
Usability of the Horizons app using the system usability scale
Time Frame: eight weeks
We will use the system usability scale at 8 weeks post-intervention (for those randomized to Horizons) to assess the usability of HORIZONS. the system usability scale score range from 0-100 with higher scores indicating better usability
eight weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Areej El-Jawahri, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 23, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 10, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 10, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 19, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 18, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The Dana-Farber / Harvard Cancer Center encourages and supports the responsible and ethical sharing of data from clinical trials. De-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript may only be shared under the terms of a Data Use Agreement. Requests may be directed to: [contact information for Sponsor Investigator or designee]. The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data can be shared no earlier than 1 year following the date of publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Contact the Partners Innovations team at http://www.partners.org/innovation

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant

Clinical Trials on App

Subscribe