- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05698446
Comparison of MBR + Suture Tape, MBR, and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in GJL Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study
April 8, 2025 updated by: Jiang Dong, Peking University Third Hospital
Comparison of Modified Broström Repair + Suture Tape and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability in Generalized Joint Laxity Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study
GJL is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an MBR for CLAI.
BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction may provide more strength and stability.
However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape, while anatomic reconstruction may be associated with more trauma.
In addition, the outcomes between the BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction were unknown.
Study Overview
Status
Recruiting
Conditions
Detailed Description
Generalized joint laxity (GJL) is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an open modified Broström repair (MBR) for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI).
MBR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction may provide more strength and stability.
However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape, while anatomic reconstruction may be associated with more trauma.
In addition, the outcomes between the BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction were unknown.
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Estimated)
114
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Contact
- Name: Dong Jiang, MD
- Phone Number: 13811280948
- Email: bysyjiangdong@126.com
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Anhong Wang, MD
- Phone Number: 18501325799
- Email: 1811210533@pku.edu.cn
Study Locations
-
-
-
Beijing, China
- Recruiting
- Peking University Third Hospital
-
Contact:
- Dong Jiang, MD
- Phone Number: 13811280948
- Email: bysyjiangdong@126.com
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 60 years (Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sampling Method
Probability Sample
Study Population
The patients who go to visit a doctor for persistent lateral ankle pain and instability over three months and invalid conservative treatment, with the age of 18- 60 years.
If the Beighton score of the patient is ≥4 and the exclusion criteria are met, he or she is going to be advised to participate in this study.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical diagnosis of lateral ankle pain and instability Beighton score ≥4 Age with 18 to 60 years
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with an acute or subacute ankle injury (within 3 months) Injury of the deltoid ligament Alignment of lower extremity greater than 5 degrees Fractures of the lower extremity Stage III or IV osteoarthritis Patients who refused to participate in the study
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Anatomic reconstruction operation group
Patients who accept an anatomic reconstruction
|
Anatomic reconstruction operation
|
|
Open Modified Broström +Suture tape augmentation group
Patients who accept a modified Broström +Suture tape augmentation operation
|
Patients with CLAI and GJL will accept the Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation
|
|
Open Modified Broström group
Patients who under went open Modified Broström-Gould surgery
|
Open Modified Broström-Gould surgery
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Karlsson-Peterson score
Time Frame: postoperative Karlsson score at 1 year
|
This score is a primary scale for lateral ankle instability, with a maximum value of 100 and minimum value of 0. Larger Karlsson-Peterson score represents better ankle functional outcomes.
|
postoperative Karlsson score at 1 year
|
|
Karlsson-Peterson score
Time Frame: postoperative Karlsson score at 2 years
|
This score is a primary scale for lateral ankle instability, with a maximum value of 100 and minimum value of 0. Larger Karlsson-Peterson score represents better ankle functional outcomes.
|
postoperative Karlsson score at 2 years
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Anterior displacement and talar tilt angle in stress radiography
Time Frame: postoperative radiographic measures at 2 years
|
The outcomes are common indicators for evaluation the lateral stability of ankle
|
postoperative radiographic measures at 2 years
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of re-injury
Time Frame: the rate of re-injury at 2 years
|
After surgery, the rate of patients re-sprain
|
the rate of re-injury at 2 years
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Sacks HA, Prabhakar P, Wessel LE, Hettler J, Strickland SM, Potter HG, Fufa DT. Generalized Joint Laxity in Orthopaedic Patients: Clinical Manifestations, Radiographic Correlates, and Management. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2019 Mar 20;101(6):558-566. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.18.00458. No abstract available.
- Xu HX, Lee KB. Modified Brostrom Procedure for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability in Patients With Generalized Joint Laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3152-3157. doi: 10.1177/0363546516657816. Epub 2016 Aug 5.
- Lan R, Piatt ET, Bolia IK, Haratian A, Hasan L, Peterson AB, Howard M, Korber S, Weber AE, Petrigliano FA, Tan EW. Suture Tape Augmentation in Lateral Ankle Ligament Surgery: Current Concepts Review. Foot Ankle Orthop. 2021 Oct 20;6(4):24730114211045978. doi: 10.1177/24730114211045978. eCollection 2021 Oct.
- Michels F, Cordier G, Burssens A, Vereecke E, Guillo S. Endoscopic reconstruction of CFL and the ATFL with a gracilis graft: a cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1007-14. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3779-1. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
- Cho BK, Park JK, Choi SM, SooHoo NF. A randomized comparison between lateral ligaments augmentation using suture-tape and modified Brostrom repair in young female patients with chronic ankle instability. Foot Ankle Surg. 2019 Apr;25(2):137-142. doi: 10.1016/j.fas.2017.09.008. Epub 2017 Oct 18.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
November 1, 2021
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
June 1, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
January 16, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 24, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
January 26, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
April 11, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 8, 2025
Last Verified
March 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- M2022514
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
The demographics data, Beighton score, primary and secondary outcomes would be available to other researchers
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Ankle Sprains
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruiting
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingAnkle SprainsPakistan
-
MEDRx USA, Inc.CompletedAnkle SprainsUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint EtienneRecruiting
-
Superior UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Taipei Medical University WanFang HospitalCompleted
-
Lazaros LazarouCompletedAnkle SprainsGreece
-
Rehabilitation Centre ZivotCompletedAnkle SprainsBosnia and Herzegovina
-
Universiteit AntwerpenUniversity Hospital, Antwerp; University of Ulster; Bern University of Applied...Recruiting
-
Riphah International UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation
-
Peking University Third HospitalRecruitingAnkle Sprain | Hypermobility, JointChina
-
Peking University Third HospitalRecruitingAnkle Sprains | Instability, Joint | Joint HypermobilityChina
-
Peking University Third HospitalCompletedAnkle Sprains | Instability, Joint | Joint HypermobilityChina
-
Columbia UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Medical University of GrazCompletedAnterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury | Knee Instability | Anterior Cruciate Ligament Graft FailureAustria