Comparison of MBR + Suture Tape, MBR, and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in GJL Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study

April 8, 2025 updated by: Jiang Dong, Peking University Third Hospital

Comparison of Modified Broström Repair + Suture Tape and Anatomic Reconstruction for CLAI in Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability in Generalized Joint Laxity Cases: A Prospective Cohort Study

GJL is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an MBR for CLAI. BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction may provide more strength and stability. However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape, while anatomic reconstruction may be associated with more trauma. In addition, the outcomes between the BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction were unknown.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Generalized joint laxity (GJL) is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an open modified Broström repair (MBR) for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). MBR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction may provide more strength and stability. However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape, while anatomic reconstruction may be associated with more trauma. In addition, the outcomes between the BPR with suture tape augmentation and anatomic reconstruction were unknown.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

114

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China
        • Recruiting
        • Peking University Third Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

The patients who go to visit a doctor for persistent lateral ankle pain and instability over three months and invalid conservative treatment, with the age of 18- 60 years. If the Beighton score of the patient is ≥4 and the exclusion criteria are met, he or she is going to be advised to participate in this study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinical diagnosis of lateral ankle pain and instability Beighton score ≥4 Age with 18 to 60 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with an acute or subacute ankle injury (within 3 months) Injury of the deltoid ligament Alignment of lower extremity greater than 5 degrees Fractures of the lower extremity Stage III or IV osteoarthritis Patients who refused to participate in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Anatomic reconstruction operation group
Patients who accept an anatomic reconstruction
Anatomic reconstruction operation
Open Modified Broström +Suture tape augmentation group
Patients who accept a modified Broström +Suture tape augmentation operation
Patients with CLAI and GJL will accept the Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation
Open Modified Broström group
Patients who under went open Modified Broström-Gould surgery
Open Modified Broström-Gould surgery

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Karlsson-Peterson score
Time Frame: postoperative Karlsson score at 1 year
This score is a primary scale for lateral ankle instability, with a maximum value of 100 and minimum value of 0. Larger Karlsson-Peterson score represents better ankle functional outcomes.
postoperative Karlsson score at 1 year
Karlsson-Peterson score
Time Frame: postoperative Karlsson score at 2 years
This score is a primary scale for lateral ankle instability, with a maximum value of 100 and minimum value of 0. Larger Karlsson-Peterson score represents better ankle functional outcomes.
postoperative Karlsson score at 2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anterior displacement and talar tilt angle in stress radiography
Time Frame: postoperative radiographic measures at 2 years
The outcomes are common indicators for evaluation the lateral stability of ankle
postoperative radiographic measures at 2 years

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of re-injury
Time Frame: the rate of re-injury at 2 years
After surgery, the rate of patients re-sprain
the rate of re-injury at 2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 16, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 24, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

January 26, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 8, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • M2022514

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The demographics data, Beighton score, primary and secondary outcomes would be available to other researchers

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ankle Sprains

Clinical Trials on Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation

Subscribe