- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05705284
MODIFY or Medication Review in Primary Care Study (MODIFY)
The Development and iMplementation Of a Multidisciplinary Medication Review and Deprescribing Intervention Among Frail Older People in primarY Care (MODIFY Study)
A third of older people take five or more regular medications (polypharmacy) potentially increasing the risk of side-effects, hospital admission and death, with higher risk among people living with frailty. National recommendations suggest that medications taken by frail older people should be reviewed annually by GPs to identify and reduce/ stop inappropriate medications (deprescribing). Yet this does not happen routinely due to GPs' lack of time, increased workloads and worries about stopping medicines. Recent recommendations suggest involving other non-medical prescribers such as practice-pharmacists and advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs) in reviewing medications. However, it is unknown how staff could work together most effectively and whether they have any training needs.
This research will investigate how practice-pharmacists, ANPs and GPs could best work together with patients living with frailty to perform regular medication reviews. There are four work packages (WPs).
- Review literature to identify what makes a successful medication review and how to safely deprescribe.
- Interviews with GPs, practice-pharmacists, ANPs, frail older patients and carers will investigate where medication review should take place, the role of involved parties, type of medications that could be deprescribed, staff training needs, barriers and facilitators for implementation, and strategies to address them.
- Information from WP1&2 will be used to develop the intervention: a structured medication review process using pharmacists, ANPs and GPs and involving frail patients and their families in decisions about medications. This will be refined through workshops with service users, clinicians and commissioners. A training programme to implement the intervention and increase staff confidence in deprescribing will be developed alongside the intervention.
- Feasibility study for staff in four GP practices to be trained and to implement the intervention.(this will be subject to further amendment).
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Background A third of older people take five or more regular medications (polypharmacy) potentially increasing the risk of side-effects, hospital admission and death. These effects are higher among people living with frailty who lose their in-built reserves and become vulnerable to changes triggered by small events such as a change in medication. National recommendations suggest that medications taken by frail older people should be reviewed annually by their GPs to identify and reduce/ stop inappropriate medications (deprescribing). Yet this does not happen routinely due to GPs' lack of time, increased workloads and worries about stopping medicines.
Recent recommendations suggest involving other non-medical prescribers such as practice-pharmacists and advanced nurse practitioners (ANPs) in reviewing medications. However, it is unknown how staff could work together most effectively and whether they have any training needs.
Aim This research will investigate how practice-pharmacists, ANPs and GPs could best work together with patients living with frailty to perform regular medication review.
Methods The study involves four work packages (WPs). The research team will review previous literature to identify what makes a successful medication review and how to safely reduce/ stop inappropriate medications (WP1).
Interviews with GPs, practice-pharmacists, ANPs, frail older patients and carers will be conducted (WP2). These will discover views about where medication review should take place, the role of each of the involved parties in the process, type of medications that could be deprescribed, staff development and training needs, barriers and facilitators for implementation, and strategies to address these barriers.
Information gathered from WP1&2 will be used to develop the intervention: a structured medication review process using pharmacists, ANPs and GPs most effectively and involving frail patients and their families in decisions about medications (WP3). The intervention will be refined further through a series of workshops with service users, clinicians and commissioners. A training programme to implement the intervention and increase staff confidence in reducing/ stopping medications safely will be developed and delivered to GPs, practice-pharmacists and ANPs based on the Polypharmacy Action Learning Sets approach adopted by the Wessex Academic Health Science Network (AHSN) .
Finally, the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention to staff and patients in four GP practices will be assessed (WP4).
Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) Three PPI members have been involved in protocol development and refinement and will continue to contribute to the research study by for example being involved in developing research instruments and monitoring recruitment.
Dissemination and impact Working with colleagues in the Wessex AHSN and local clinical commissioners, the research team will be able to share our findings and training programme to the wider research and clinical community in Wessex and potentially influence practices and policies both locally and nationally.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Eloise Radcliffe, PhD
- Phone Number: (023) 8120 4656
- Email: e.radcliffe@soton.ac.uk
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Kinda Ibrahim, PhD
- Phone Number: (023) 8120 4656
- Email: k.ibrahim@soton.ac.uk
Study Locations
-
-
-
Southampton, United Kingdom
- Recruiting
- Clinical Research Network in Primary Care
-
Contact:
- Eloise Radcliff, PhD
-
Contact:
- Kinda Ibrahim, PhD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Eligibility criteria for WP2
Patients:
Inclusion criteria
- Aged 65 and over
- Frail, (as judged by their health care professional, if applicable)
- Prescribed multiple medications (10+), as determined by their health care professional
- Able to give informed consent
Exclusion criteria
- Aged under 65
- Severe cognitive impairment, as judged by their health care professional
Informal carers/ relatives eligibility criteria
Inclusion criteria
- An informal carer/ relative of a frail patient (aged 65 and over) who is taking multiple medications, as identified by a health care professional
- An informal carer/ relative of a patient (aged 65 and over) living with severe dementia who is taking multiple medications, as identified by a health care professional
- Able to consent
Health care professional eligibility criteria
• A health care professional based in GP surgeries in Wessex (eg. GPs, practice-pharmacists, advanced nurse prescriber (ANPs) who works with older people living with frailty, who are prescribed multiple medications.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Patients participating in structured multidisciplinary medication review
|
Multidisciplinary process for medication review/deprescribing: The intervention will be a structured process for performing a shared-decision, person-centred medication review among those living with frailty involving GPs, PCN-pharmacist and ANPs.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of recruitment
Time Frame: Baseline
|
proportion of staff recruited and trained in each GP practice
|
Baseline
|
|
Number of medications
Time Frame: change in scores between baseline and 3 months follow up
|
Total number of medications taken by each patient
|
change in scores between baseline and 3 months follow up
|
|
Rates of adverse events
Time Frame: at 3 months
|
rates of adverse drug events due to deprescribing (including self-reported dizziness, falls, drowsiness, confusion, hallucinations, blurred vision, constipation, diarrhoea, dry mouth or other) during 3 months follow up.
|
at 3 months
|
|
Rates of hospitalisation
Time Frame: 3 months
|
rates of hospitalisation 3 months post intervention
|
3 months
|
|
Mortality rates
Time Frame: 3 months
|
mortality rates 3 months post intervention
|
3 months
|
|
frailty status
Time Frame: changes between baseline and 3 months
|
Frailty score using the electronic frailty index (e-FI)
|
changes between baseline and 3 months
|
|
rates of falls
Time Frame: changes between baseline and 3 months
|
number of falls reported and proportion of fallers (self-reported)
|
changes between baseline and 3 months
|
|
Rates of fractures
Time Frame: changes between baseline and 3 months
|
number of fractures and proportion of people sustained fractures (self-reported)
|
changes between baseline and 3 months
|
|
function
Time Frame: changes between baseline and 3 months
|
Activity of daily living using Barthel
|
changes between baseline and 3 months
|
|
cognition
Time Frame: changes between baseline and 3 months
|
- cognition using the abbreviated mental test (AMT)
|
changes between baseline and 3 months
|
|
depression
Time Frame: changes between baseline and 3 months
|
- depression using the geriatric depression scale (GDS)
|
changes between baseline and 3 months
|
|
healthcare utilisation
Time Frame: at 3 months follow up
|
number of visits to GP/specialists and number of unplanned hospitalisations
|
at 3 months follow up
|
|
Acceptability
Time Frame: at 3 months follow up
|
Interviews or focus groups will be conducted at the end of the feasibility study with a purposive sample of (n=6-8) GPs, pharmacists, ANPs in the four GP practices who received the training and implemented the intervention, and 8-10 patients and carers who received the intervention
|
at 3 months follow up
|
|
Feasibility of deprescribing
Time Frame: 3 months follow up
|
number of recommendations in the medication reviews made to each patient (stop, reduce, switch or start).
|
3 months follow up
|
|
number of potentially inappropriate medications
Time Frame: Change between baseline and 3 months follow up
|
total number of potentially inappropriate medications months using the STOPP/START criteria.
|
Change between baseline and 3 months follow up
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kinda Ibrahim, PhD, University of Southampton
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- ERGO ID 71720
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Aging
-
Tuba MadenCompletedAging | Aging Problems | Aging Disorder
-
Florida Institute for Human and Machine CognitionNot yet recruitingAging | Healthy Aging | Aging WellUnited States
-
University of CopenhagenRecruitingAging | Healthy Aging | Aging FrailtyDenmark
-
Radboud University Medical CenterTerminated
-
Northwestern UniversityPotocsnak Human Longevity LabRecruitingAging | Aging Well | Aging, Biological | Aging, HealthyUnited States
-
TruDiagnosticBlushield USANot yet recruitingAging | Aging Well
-
Arizona State UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
San Diego State UniversityCompleted
-
Lithuanian Sports UniversityCompletedAging | Healthy AgingLithuania
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceNot yet recruitingAging | Aging, HealthyFrance
Clinical Trials on Structured multidisciplinary medication review
-
University of GroningenZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentCompletedPolypharmacy Because of Multimorbidity in Geriatric Nursing Home ResidentsNetherlands
-
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la...Andalusian Health ServiceRecruitingDisease, Chronic | Polypharmacy | Medication ReviewSpain
-
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmcZonMw: The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and DevelopmentRecruitingOlder People | Decision Making | Advance Care Planning | Prescribing Practices | Nursing Home Residents | Prescribing | Medication ReviewsNetherlands
-
Joke WuytsAssociation of Belgian Pharmacies (APB)Completed
-
Southern Adelaide Local Health NetworkActive, not recruitingPulmonary Nodule, Solitary | Pulmonary Nodule, MultipleAustralia
-
Anne Estrup OlesenFrederikshavn Kommune, Frederikshavn, Denmark; Lægeklinikken Frederikshavn,...Completed
-
Rijnstate HospitalUniversity Medical Center Groningen; Maastricht University Medical Center; Leiden... and other collaboratorsActive, not recruitingPostoperative Complications | Interdisciplinary Communication | Surgical Procedures, Operative | Preoperative Care | Cost-Benefit Analysis | Noncardiac Surgery | Comorbidities and Coexisting Conditions | Patient Care TeamNetherlands
-
Parc Sanitari Pere VirgiliRecruitingFrail Elderly | Poly PharmacySpain
-
Diakonhjemmet HospitalUniversity of Oslo; Diakonhjemmet Hospital Pharmacy; Diakonhjemmet FoundationCompletedDrug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions | Drug Interaction Potentiation | Medication Compliance | Remission | Medicinal Substance; Adverse EffectNorway
-
Erasmus Medical CenterRecruitingMalnutrition, ChildNetherlands