Edge-To-Edge Technique Used as a Bailout in Case of Sub-Optimal Mitral Repair: Very Long-Term Results

February 8, 2023 updated by: Michele De Bonis
The absence of residual mitral regurgitation (MR) after mitral valve repair is of paramount importance for the long term durability of the valve repair. Thus, ideally, after weaning from cardio-pulmonary by-pass (CPB) the trans-esophageal echocardiogram (TEE) should show no (or only trivial) residual MR, good coaptation length and no iatrogenic mitral valve stenosis. However, mild or more residual MR can be present in up to 4% of the patients after the initial mitral valve repair and a second CPB run may be necessary to improve the repair results. Mechanism of residual MR can be dynamic, related to systolic anterior motion (SAM) or to severe left ventricular dysfunction, and anatomical, related to residual prolapse, cleft, and suture or ring dehiscence. In several cases medical therapy can be effective in the management of the intra-operatively detected SAM, and residual cleft or suture dehiscence can be easily corrected during a second CPB run. However, in other cases SAM is not responsive to medical therapy or the residual MR jet would require complex and time-consuming techniques to be addressed, or even worse scenario, a mitral valve replacement could be necessary. In such cases the edge-to-edge (EE) technique can be used as a bail-out procedure. The anatomical characteristics of the mitral valve after an initial sub-optimal repair are certainly not ideal for the edge-to-edge technique, due to a possible significant reduction in the valve area, especially in case of posterior leaflet resection or small ring implanted. Nevertheless, in the short term the edge-to-edge technique used to rescue patients with sub-optimal initial repair resulted effective. However, the very long-term results of the edge-to-edge technique used as bail-out are not known. Thus, the aim of this study is to evaluate the clinical and echocardiographic results of the edge-to-edge technique used to rescue patients with initial sub-optimal mitral repair.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

81

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy, 20132
        • IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients who underwent a mitral valve repair surgery and in whom, at the intraoperative echo control, results where not satisfying, so an edge-to-edge repair was also performed as a bailout procedure

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients;
  • Patients underwent mitral valve repair, with more than mild residual MR at the intraoperative TEE after leaving the CPB;
  • Patients in whom EtE alone has been added to the repair already performed, as a technique to reduce residual MR after first attempt of mitral valve repair;
  • Patients operated both in median sternotomy or in minithoracotomy;
  • Patients operated on at the Cardiac Surgery departmet of San Raffaele Hospital since January 1999 to December 2015.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients in whom other techniques have been used as a bailout procedure, concurrently or instead of EtE;
  • Patients where the initial repair has been modified or undone;
  • Patients whose mitral valve has been replaced.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: Up to 22 years
Up to 22 years
Reintervention for MR recurrency
Time Frame: Up to 22 years
Up to 22 years
MR recurrency
Time Frame: Up to 22 years
Up to 22 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 10, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

July 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 8, 2023

Last Verified

February 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ETEB-SOR-VLT

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Mitral Regurgitation

Clinical Trials on Bailout edge to edge

Subscribe