Safety and Feasibility of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence for Intraoperative Assessment of Intestinal Perfusion in Young Infants and Neonates (IMAGINE)

May 11, 2023 updated by: University Medical Center Groningen

Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography Mediated Assessment of Gastro-Intestinal Perfusion in Neonates

The goal of this clinical trial is to test the use of the SPY-PHI device for the purpose of ICG-mediated intestinal perfusion visualization during gastrointestinal surgery in neonates and young infants (<3 months old) undergoing surgery for NEC, atresia, SIP or malrotation. The main question[s] it aims to answer are:

  • Is ICG-FA feasible for intraoperative use in neonates and young infants undergoing laparotomy for NEC, atresia, SIP or malrotation?
  • Is ICG-FA is safe to use in neonates during surgery?

Participants will undergo surgical care for their diseases within the standard of care. During laparotomy, the pediatric surgeon will assess bowel perfusion in two ways. First, by visual inspection (the conventional method). Second, the intestine will be analyzed with indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) by means of the hand-held SPY-PHI camera. For this purpose, the patients will be administered ICG intravenously. Afterwards, the intestinal perfusion will be assessed by means of the SPY-PHI device in 5 to 10 minutes.

Specifically, the feasibility and safety for use of ICG-FA in neonates undergoing laparotomy as treatment for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), atresia, spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) and malrotation will be investigated.

If ICG-FA turns out to be feasible and safe for the population investigated in this study, a follow-up study will be conducted with the aim to explore the potential benefits of this technique on the postoperative outcome and intraoperative decision-making.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study aims to investigate whether the intraoperative use of indocyanine green fluorescence angiography (ICG-FA) is feasible and safe in neonates. Feasibility is therein defined as practically possible use of ICG-FA, resulting in clear and interpretable results, with the future potential to improve clinical outcome and benefits for the patient.

Specifically, the feasibility and safety for use of ICG-FA in neonates undergoing laparotomy as treatment for necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), atresia, spontaneous intestinal perforation (SIP) and malrotation will be investigated.

If ICG-FA turns out to be feasible and safe for the population investigated in this study, a follow-up study will be conducted with the aim to explore the potential benefits of this technique on the postoperative outcome and intraoperative decision-making.

The primary endpoint of this study is assessing the feasibility and safety of intraoperative ICG-FA imaging in neonates undergoing laparotomy for NEC, atresia, SIP, or malrotation. The secondary endpoint of this study is postoperative comparison of the images; standard visual inspection (conventional image) with the corresponding fluorescence image.

During laparotomy, first the pediatric surgeon performs the visual inspection of the predetermined areas (mid jejunum, ileum, ascending colon and sigmoid) as well as regions of interest such as ischemic lesions in NEC and malrotation with volvulus. In case of intestinal necrosis, both edges of the parts that will be resected must be marked with a suture. Second, the intestine will be analyzed using ICG-FA. This analysis will cover the predetermined areas as well as regions of interest.

To this end, the ICG should be injected intravenously by the one member of the anesthetic team. This will only be done if the operating team, consisting of both the consultant surgeon and consultant pediatric anesthesiologist, consider it safe to do so. Utilizing the mobile unit with computer and camera head, the fluorescence angiography system can measure tissue perfusion. Before the start of the procedure in which the SPY-PHY camera will be used intraoperatively, the camera will be covered with sterile drapes. The pediatric surgeon will first make conventional video images with the camera of the predetermined areas and the region of interest and second, the surgeon will make images of the ICG-FA with the camera, which both will be recorded to be analyzed later.

The ICG-FA images do not alter the decision on what type of surgical procedure will be performed and/or how much length of bowel will be resected. In case of a difficult decision, a second pediatric surgeon will be consulted, which is routine clinical practice in both centers anyway.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 3 months (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent is obtained by both patient's parents or legal guardians (as applicable);
  • Patient is a neonate (< 1 month of age) or young infant (<3 months of age);
  • Patient is suffering from necrotizing enterocolitis, atresia, malrotation or spontaneous intestinal perforation;
  • Patient requires laparotomy for management of the disease.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is suffering from clinically significant (treatment necessary) hyperbilirubinemia;
  • Patient is suffering from thyroid or liver disease;
  • Patient is allergic to the active substance indocyanine green or sodium iodide or iodine;
  • Patient has abdominal wall defects;
  • Patient can be treated non-surgically;
  • During the preoperative multidisciplinary meeting with the team, including the pediatric anesthetist, patient is deemed not stable enough hemodynamically to perform the ICG-FU measurements
  • Patient is assessed unstable by operating team intraoperatively.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Intraoperative perfusion assessment using ICG-FA
Surgical procedure within standard of care. Intraoperatively, the vitality of the bowel will be assessed visually (the conventional method). Afterwards, participants will be administered indocyanine green intravenously.
Minutes after injection of ICG, the intestinal perfusion can and will be assessed using the SPY-PHI camera by Stryker Endoscopy. The operative plan will not be changed based on the results of the perfusion assessment. Images will be recorded and evaluated postoperatively.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of ICG-FA for intraoperative assessment of intestinal perfusion
Time Frame: 10 minutes intraoperatively (recording)
a. Possibility for the researchers to assess intestinal perfusion based on the intraoperative ICG-FA images (clarity: yes/no);
10 minutes intraoperatively (recording)
Feasibility of ICG-FA for intraoperative assessment of intestinal perfusion
Time Frame: 10 minutes intraoperatively (recording)
b. Possibility for the researchers to point out a specific location for resection of the bowel based on visualization of perfusion in the ICG-FA images (interpretability: yes/no);
10 minutes intraoperatively (recording)
Feasibility of ICG-FA for intraoperative assessment of intestinal perfusion
Time Frame: 10 minutes intraoperatively (recording)
c. Comparison of the number of procedures in which it was a priori possible to perform ICG-FA imaging and the number of procedures in which the device was eventually used intraoperatively (applicability);
10 minutes intraoperatively (recording)
Feasibility of ICG-FA for intraoperative assessment of intestinal perfusion
Time Frame: 10 minutes intraoperatively (recording)
d. Interference with intraoperative Near Infrared Spectroscopy (NIRS) brain monitoring (compatibility: brain monitoring not interfered with/possible despite interference/impossible due to interference);
10 minutes intraoperatively (recording)
Safety of intraoperative ICG-FA in gastrointestinal surgery for young infants and neonates
Time Frame: 24 hours
a. Number of complications directly related to use of the device or extension of operative time for ICG-FA imaging, occurring within 24 hours after surgery in the patients involved in this study;
24 hours
Safety of intraoperative ICG-FA in gastrointestinal surgery for young infants and neonates
Time Frame: 24 hours
b. Measurement of the prolonged OR time associated with intraoperative ICG-FA in minutes;
24 hours

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of conventional and ICG-FA mediated assessment
Time Frame: Through study completion, on average within 4 weeks
a. Comparing whether the perfusion assessment of ICG-FA can provide more certainty on the perfusion status of intestinal sections than conventional visual assessment (by comparing ICG-FA images with normal view images) in order to identify whether ICG-FA, if applied for decision-making, would have confirmed or altered intraoperative decision making.
Through study completion, on average within 4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jan Hulscher, MD, PhD, UMC Groningen

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 3, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

February 17, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 12, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 11, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Malrotation

Clinical Trials on Perfusion assessment by means of the SPY-PHI camera

3
Subscribe