- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05762575
Application of Spaghetti Knotting Technology in Single-hole Laparoscopic Suturing Instructional Program on the Basis of Multidirectional Stitching Technology.
May 2, 2023 updated by: Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
Application of New Knotting Methods in Single-hole Laparoscopic Suturing Instructional Program on the Basis of Multidirectional Stitching Technology
The surgeon's knot-tying technique plays a crucial role in the recovery of patients after single-port laparoscopy.
Knot tying is very challenging in minimally invasive surgery and is a critical skill in advanced surgery.
In this study, investigators introduce a new knotting technique, compare it with the traditional knotting technique in many aspects, and also discuss its application in the teaching of single-port laparoscopic knotting.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Actual)
40
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Zhejiang, China
- The Second Affiliated Hospital and Yuying Children's Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Sampling Method
Non-Probability Sample
Study Population
All the candidates were junior residents.
Forty volunteers were selected according to the established criteria and randomly divided into control group and experimental group by computer-generated simple randomization.
There were twenty volunteers in each group, and each group was composed of five males and fifteen females.
The volunteers in control group study traditional knotting technology, and the volunteers in experimental group study new knotting technology.
A statistician in our hospital completed the random distribution of the subjects and ensured the confidentiality of the grouping information.
Before participating in the study, the subjects completed a questionnaire about their demographic information, such as age, gender and experience in video games.
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- the habitual hand is the right hand;
- no practical experience in operating single-hole laparoscopic instruments;
- no simulator sickness;
- training and assessment are completed on time and carefully
Exclusion Criteria:
- have participated in other skills training programs
- are not interested in single-hole laparoscopy will be excluded
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
control group
The volunteers in control group study traditional knotting technology,
|
The volunteers in experimental group study new knotting technology.
|
|
new knotting group
The volunteers in experimental group study new knotting technology.
|
The volunteers in experimental group study new knotting technology.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Accuracy of needle entry
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
|
The needle stick should be in and out of the centre of the dot.
The operator received 2 points if it was in the centre of the dot, 1 point if it deviated from the centre, and 0 points if it was outside the dot.
|
through study completion, an average of 1 month
|
|
Stability of the knot
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
|
The knot was required to be a surgical triple knot and should not have been a smooth knot or a loose knot.
A normal knot received 2 points.
A smooth knot received 1 point,and 0 points were awarded for a loose knot.
|
through study completion, an average of 1 month
|
|
Tissue integrity
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
|
The suture tissue should not be damaged or ruptured.
The trainee received a score of two for integrity, 1 for a few cracks, and 0 for a complete fracture of the tissue.
|
through study completion, an average of 1 month
|
|
Tightness of the tissue
Time Frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
|
The tightness of the suture tissue indicated that the two sides of the sutured tissue were closely connected.
The operator received 2 points if there was no gap between the two sides of the incision, 1 point for a few gaps, and 0 points for a totally loose suture.
|
through study completion, an average of 1 month
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 25, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
January 25, 2023
Study Completion (Actual)
January 26, 2023
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 8, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
March 9, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
May 4, 2023
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 2, 2023
Last Verified
May 1, 2023
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- SAHoWMU-CR2022-07-205
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Knotting Methods
-
Sentara Norfolk General HospitalMcMaster UniversityCompletedInstructional MethodsUnited States
-
Tanta UniversityCompletedProgesterone | Contraceptive MethodsEgypt
-
Herlev HospitalCompleted
-
Stanford UniversityCompletedAnatomy Teaching MethodsUnited States
-
University Hospital, GhentCompletedPostoperative Care/Methods | Drainage/Methods | Edema/Prevention & Control | Orthognathic Surgical Procedures/Adverse EffectsBelgium
-
Universiti Putra MalaysiaNot yet recruitingPhysical Education and Training/Methods
-
Pennington Biomedical Research CenterNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)Completed
-
Ohio State UniversityWithdrawnAdministration Methods of Labor AnalgesiaUnited States
-
Paulista UniversityRecruitingRecovery Time | Recovery MethodsBrazil
-
Konya Necmettin Erbakan ÜniversitesiCompleted
Clinical Trials on knotting methods
-
Orhan ÜreyenCompletedAppendicitis, Surgery
-
Punjab Health Care CommissionCompletedAppendicectomyPakistan
-
Alpine Immune Sciences Inc, A Subsidiary of VertexCompletedSystemic Lupus ErythematosusUnited States, France, Hungary, Poland, Puerto Rico, Spain, Taiwan
-
Cairo UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
Eskisehir Osmangazi UniversityCompletedInterventions PainTurkey
-
Université du Québec a MontréalCompleted
-
Adiyaman University Research HospitalCompleted
-
Edward Hines Jr. VA HospitalCompletedObesityUnited States
-
Beijing Friendship HospitalBeijing Chao Yang HospitalUnknownFever of Unknown Origin | Tick-borne DiseasesChina
-
Acibadem UniversityRecruitingPain | Infant ALL | PretermTurkey