- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05764369
Optimizing Residential Treatment Gains for Adolescents
Optimizing Residential Treatment Gains for Adolescents Through Tailored Behavioral Parent Training
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
A randomized controlled trial (RCT) design is employed to evaluate the feasibility, acceptability, engagement of target mechanisms, and preliminary effects of PWRT in parents with adolescents transitioning from residential treatment (RT) to the community. Parents (n=60) will be randomly assigned to receive Parenting Wisely augmented with facilitated discussion groups (referred to as PWRT; n=30) or treatment-as-usual (TAU; n=30). In the PWRT condition, parents will complete 2 web-based modules in an online parent training program called Parenting Wisely. Parents will also attend a 90-minute discussion group via Zoom. The RCT will allow for testing of target mechanism engagement (i.e., parental self-efficacy, parenting behaviors, social support, family function) and the intervention's effects on adolescent outcomes (i.e., internalizing behaviors, externalizing behaviors, placement restrictiveness). Parents will complete assessments at baseline (T1), six weeks post-baseline (T2), and six months post-baseline (T3) via REDCap. While adolescents (n=60) will not directly receive the intervention, they will complete assessments at baseline, six weeks post-baseline (T2), and six months post-baseline (T3).
Aim 1: Evaluate the feasibility and acceptability of PWRT. 1a. Evaluate the feasibility of PWRT by tracking the frequency, dose, and duration. 1b. Evaluate the acceptability of PWRT for parents with adolescents in RT.
Aim 2: Determine the effects of PWRT on the target mechanisms compared to the TAU condition from baseline to 6-weeks and 6-months post-baseline.
Aim 3: Determine the effects of PWRT on adolescent outcomes compared to the TAU condition from baseline to 6-weeks and 6-months post-baseline. 3a. Determine if changes in the target mechanisms are associated with adolescent outcomes at six weeks and six months post-baseline.
Exploratory Aim: Explore the feasibility of collecting data from adolescents in an RT facility by tracking frequency (recruitment, enrollment, retention rates), duration (time between parent consent and assent; survey duration), and barriers to data collection.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Columbus, Ohio, United States, 43210
- Ohio State University College of Nursing
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Parent Inclusion Criteria:
- Caregiver (e.g., biological, step, kin, foster, adoptive) to an adolescent aged 11-17 years old admitted to psychiatric residential treatment;
- The caregiver is allowed contact with the adolescent;
- Has access to a device (e.g., smartphone) with internet access.
Adolescent Inclusion Criteria:
- Ability to understand and willingness to provide written assent
- Legal guardian provides written consent;
- Currently or previously admitted to psychiatric residential treatment
- Aged 11-17 years at enrollment;
Parent and Adolescent Exclusion Criteria:
- Not able to speak English
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Parenting Wisely Residential Treatment (PWRT)
In the PWRT condition, parents will complete a total of ten web-based modules in an online parent training program called Parenting Wisely.
Each week, parents will also attend a 90-minute facilitated discussion group via Zoom.
Parents will complete assessments at baseline (T1), six weeks post-baseline (T2), and six months post-baseline (T3) via REDCap.
While adolescents (n=60) will not directly receive the intervention, they will complete assessments at baseline, six weeks post-baseline (T2), and six months post-baseline (T3).
|
PWRT experimental intervention
Other Names:
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Treatment as Usual (TAU)
The TAU condition is the standard of care offered to parents in RT settings.
Parents in the TAU condition will receive traditional programming, including family therapy offered weekly during the RT admission.
Parents will attend discharge planning meetings with caseworkers (if assigned) to discuss the adolescent's progress, continued treatment needs, safety plans, upcoming appointments, and medication needs.
Following discharge, programs frequently recommend follow-up with an outpatient provider for medication management and therapy for the adolescent.
Parents will complete assessments at baseline (T1), six weeks post-baseline (T2), and six months post-baseline (T3) via REDCap.
While adolescents (n=60) will not directly receive the intervention, they will complete assessments at baseline, six weeks post-baseline (T2), and six months post-baseline (T3).
|
The TAU condition is the standard of care offered to parents in RT settings.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Group Attendance (Feasibility)
Time Frame: Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline
|
The mean number of groups attended by participants.
|
Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline
|
|
Module Completion (Feasibility)
Time Frame: Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline
|
The mean number of modules completed by participants in Parenting Wisely.
|
Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline
|
|
Module Duration (Feasibility)
Time Frame: Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline
|
The mean time participants spent completing one module in Parenting Wisely.
|
Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline
|
|
Group Duration (Feasibility)
Time Frame: Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline
|
The mean amount of time participants spent in a single session of the group.
|
Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline
|
|
PWRT Acceptability
Time Frame: Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline
|
Participants will complete a satisfaction survey to evaluate the acceptability of PWRT.
The satisfaction survey consists of 13-items.
Total scores range from 0-39; higher scores indicate greater perceptions of acceptability.
|
Mean calculated at 6-weeks post-baseline
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Adolescent Internalizing Behaviors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6-weeks post-baseline
|
Adolescent internalizing behaviors will be assessed using the Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) for ages 6 to 18.
The BPM consists of 19 items derived from the Child Behavior Checklist.
The subscales include internalizing, externalizing, and attention subscales.
Raw scores range from 0-38; higher scores indicate greater internalizing behaviors.
|
Change from baseline to 6-weeks post-baseline
|
|
Change in Adolescent Internalizing Behaviors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline
|
Adolescent internalizing behaviors will be assessed using the Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) for ages 6 to 18.
The BPM consists of 19 items derived from the Child Behavior Checklist.
The subscales include internalizing, externalizing, and attention subscales.
Raw scores range from 0-38; higher scores indicate greater internalizing behaviors.
|
Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline
|
|
Change in Adolescent Externalizing Behaviors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6-weeks post-baseline
|
Adolescent externalizing behaviors will be assessed using the Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) for ages 6 to 18.
The BPM consists of 19 items derived from the Child Behavior Checklist.
The subscales include internalizing, externalizing, and attention subscales.
Raw scores range from 0-38; higher scores indicate greater externalizing behaviors.
|
Change from baseline to 6-weeks post-baseline
|
|
Change in Adolescent Externalizing Behaviors
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline
|
Adolescent externalizing behaviors will be assessed using the Brief Problem Monitor (BPM) for ages 6 to 18.
The BPM consists of 19 items derived from the Child Behavior Checklist.
The subscales include internalizing, externalizing, and attention subscales.
Raw scores range from 0-38; higher scores indicate greater externalizing behaviors.
|
Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline
|
|
Change in Restrictiveness of Living Environment
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6-weeks post-baseline
|
The Restrictiveness Evaluation Measure (REM) will be administered to evaluate perceptions of adolescent placement restrictiveness.
The REM was designed and tested in residential treatment settings.
There are two subscales; one scale identifies 25 placement settings varying in restrictiveness and the second subscale consists of questions about the activity and lifestyle restrictions in such placements.
Total scores range from 24-120; higher scores indicate more restrictive living environments.
|
Change from baseline to 6-weeks post-baseline
|
|
Change in Restrictiveness of Living Environment
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline
|
The Restrictiveness Evaluation Measure (REM) will be administered to parents and adolescents to evaluate perceptions of adolescent placement restrictiveness.
The REM was designed and tested in residential treatment settings.
There are two subscales; one scale identifies 25 placement settings varying in restrictiveness and the second subscale consists of questions about the activity and lifestyle restrictions in such placements.
Total scores range from 24-120; higher scores indicate more restrictive living environments.
|
Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline
|
|
Change in Family Function
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6-weeks post-baseline
|
The McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD) will be administered to parents to evaluate changes in family function.
The FAD consists of 60-items that assess seven domains of family function: problem-solving, family roles, communication, affective involvement, affective responsiveness, behavioral control, general functioning.
Total scores range from 60-240; higher scores indicate better family function.
|
Change from baseline to 6-weeks post-baseline
|
|
Change in Family Function
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline
|
The McMaster Family Assessment Device (FAD) will be administered to parents to evaluate changes in family function.
The FAD consists of 60-items that assess seven domains of family function: problem-solving, family roles, communication, affective involvement, affective responsiveness, behavioral control, general functioning.
Total scores range from 60-240; higher scores indicate better family function.
|
Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline
|
|
Change in Social Support
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6-weeks post-baseline
|
The Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Support Survey will be administered to parents to evaluate changes in social support.
The MOS consists of 19-items that assess five social support domains: emotional support, informational support, tangible support, affectionate support, and positive social interaction.
Total scores range from 20-100; higher scores indicate greater social support.
|
Change from baseline to 6-weeks post-baseline
|
|
Change in Social Support
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline
|
The Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Social Support Survey will be administered to parents to evaluate changes in social support.
The MOS consists of 19-items that assess five social support domains: emotional support, informational support, tangible support, affectionate support, and positive social interaction.Total scores range from 20-100; higher scores indicate greater social support.
|
Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline
|
|
Change in Parenting Self Efficacy
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6-weeks post-baseline
|
Parents will complete the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC) to evaluate changes in parental self-efficacy.
The PSOC consists of 17-items and is designed for parents with children aged birth to 17.
The two subscales in the PSOC are satisfaction and efficacy.
Total scores range from 17-102; higher scores indicate greater perceptions of self-efficacy and confidence.
|
Change from baseline to 6-weeks post-baseline
|
|
Change in Parenting Self Efficacy
Time Frame: Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline
|
Parents will complete the Parenting Sense of Competence Scale (PSOC) to evaluate changes in parental self-efficacy.
The PSOC consists of 17-items and is designed for parents with children aged birth to 17.
The two subscales in the PSOC are satisfaction and efficacy.
Total scores range from 17-102; higher scores indicate greater perceptions of self-efficacy and confidence.
|
Change from baseline to 6-months post-baseline
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2022B0315
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- ICF
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Parenting
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development...Recruiting
-
Tampere University HospitalTampere UniversityCompletedParenting Satisfaction | Parenting Self-efficacyFinland
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityThe Rita and Alex Hillman Foundation; Abell Foundation; Richman Foundation; Sherman... and other collaboratorsRecruitingParenting | Parenting InterventionUnited States
-
Ministry of Health, KuwaitActive, not recruitingChild Development | Child Mental Health | Parenting Intervention | Parenting BehaviorKuwait
-
University of TurkuRecruiting
-
University of MinnesotaArizona State UniversityCompleted
-
WestatMakerere UniversityCompleted
-
Central Hospital, Nancy, FranceCompleted
-
Yale UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Parenting Wisely Residential Treatment (PWRT)
-
Brown UniversityNational Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA); Rhode Island HospitalCompletedSubstance Use | Adolescent BehaviorUnited States
-
Washington University School of MedicineThe Jennings School DistrictCompletedChildhood Mental DisorderUnited States
-
Rhode Island HospitalUnknown
-
Family Works IncorporatedOregon Research InstituteCompletedParenting | DelinquencyUnited States
-
The University of Tennessee, KnoxvilleUnknown
-
Washington University School of MedicineEnrolling by invitation
-
VA Office of Research and DevelopmentVA Boston Healthcare System; Center for Biostatistics and Health Data ScienceCompletedPTSD | Substance Use DisordersUnited States
-
Arizona State UniversityDepartment of Health and Human ServicesRecruitingEvaluation of the Parenting in the Moment Online Program for Forcibly Displaced Families (PIMonline)Trauma | Parenting | Post Traumatic Stress Disorder | Mental Health | Emotional Regulation | Child Maltreatment | Child Wellbeing | Adjustment | Child Safety | CoercionUnited States
-
Montefiore Medical CenterThe FAR FundCompletedParenting | Parent-Child RelationshipUnited States
-
Örebro University, SwedenUppsala University; Linkoeping University; Swedish Council for Working Life and... and other collaboratorsRecruitingIntellectual Disability | Autism Spectrum Disorder | Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSweden