Different Treatments in Chronic Pain Patients. (EC_PC_AZSTL)

June 5, 2024 updated by: University Ghent

Research of the Different Treatments for Chronic Pain Patients, Their Effectiveness and Associated Predictors, Offered at the Pain Center AZ Sint-Lucas Ghent.

The goal of this observational study is to compare different treatment options in a chronic pain population. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • What is the effectiveness of the different therapy options in the pain center of Sint-Lucas on outcomes related to pain and disability?
  • What are predictive factors for the different therapy options in the pain center of Sint-Lucas? Which factors predict improvement in pain related outcomes?

Participant data will be gathered as part of their routine care. They can be advised to 4 different treatment options:

  • Consultations with the pain specialist
  • Interventions by the pain specialist (infiltrations, denervations)
  • Baxter therapy
  • Interdisciplinary treatment

Researchers will compare patients with different dominant pain mechanisms to see which treatment are most effective for which dominant pain mechanisms.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The aim of the present study is to describe the natural flow of the chronic pain patients at the pain center AZ Sint-Lucas. Patients will be examined before starting the therapy, and receive standardized questionnaires at several fixed time points (before, during, and after their therapy trajectory). Information about the present dominant pain mechanism will be gathered during the examination. The questionnaires will gather demographic data, information about the present dominant pain mechanism, psychosocial factors, catastrophizing, fear and avoidance, illness perceptions, fatigue and information about therapy success. During the examination, typical signs of a dominant nociplastic pain mechanism will be gathered. By processing the data of the questionnaires and the examination, knowledge about (1) the amount of patients with a dominant nociplastic pain mechanism at intake, (2) the treatment trajectory for a specific diagnosis, and (3) the prediction of the therapy effect and prognosis will be obtained.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The population will be patients attending the pain center of AZ Sint-Lucas in Ghent, a secondary care center for chronic pain patients.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults
  • Chronic pain patients
  • Dutch speaking, or good understanding

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Adults unable to give consent
  • Adults who do not understand Dutch

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Chronic pain patients
Chronic pain patients with a dominant nociceptive pain mechanism, a dominant neuropathic pain mechanism and a dominant nociplastic pain mechanism. They will receive different treatments: Consultations, Interventions (injections, denervations...), Baxter therapy and interdisciplinary treatment.
Facet injections, nerve denervations, infiltrations, Qutenza, Spinal Cord Stimulation, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation
Interdisciplinary therapy provided by the physiotherapist, psychologist and occupational therapist.
Consultation with the pain specialist, which might entail prescription of medication of vitamins.
Ketamine or Linisol baxter therapy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Pain disability from baseline until 18 months
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 4 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Pain Disability Index, ranges from zero to 70, with a higher score indicating more pain-related disability
0 weeks, 4 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Change in Pain intensity from baseline until 18 months
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 4 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Numeric Rating Scale for pain intensity in the past week, ranges from zero to 100, with a higher score indicating a higher pain intensity
0 weeks, 4 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Change in Pain Frequency from baseline until 18 months
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 4 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Questions
0 weeks, 4 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Change in Functionality from baseline until 18 months
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 4 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Patient Specific Complaints questionnaire, using a Numeric Rating Scale, ranging from zero to 100, with a higher score indicating a higher amount of functional disability
0 weeks, 4 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Change in Quality of Life from baseline until 18 months
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 4 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
EuroQol-5D questionnaire
0 weeks, 4 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Post exertional malaise from baseline until 18 months
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 4 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Questions based on the criteria for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome.
0 weeks, 4 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
Change in Quality of Life from baseline until 18 months
Time Frame: 0 weeks, 4 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months
EuroQol - 5D, five questions about health range from one to three with a higher score indicating more difficulties. One question about perceived health ranges from zero to 100 with a higher score indicating better health.
0 weeks, 4 weeks, 10 weeks, 6 months, 12 months, 18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jessica Van Oosterwijck, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 6, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 1, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 30, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 5, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • ONZ-2022-0090
  • 2021-39 (Registry Identifier: AZ Sint Lucas Hospital Ghent)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

The personal data will be shared with the personal electronic patient file of AZ Sint-Lucas, of each patient.

Sharing of data will be done upon reasonable request, and only for research purposes, after publication of the results. Data will be shared via a restricted data repository (FAIRsharing.org)

IPD Sharing Time Frame

The data will not be transferred to a third country. The ethical committee of the pain center of AZ Sint-Lucas did not allow for data transfer upon reasonable request.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

The data will not be transferred to a third country.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Chronic Pain

Clinical Trials on Interventions

Subscribe