KTP Laser vs Pulsed Dye Laser for Port-Wine Stains

March 5, 2023 updated by: Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Potassium Tetanyl Phosphate Laser vs Pulsed Dye Laser for Treating Port-Wine Stains - A Prospective, Split-Side Study

To compare the efficacy and safety of 532nm KTP laser and 585 nm pulsed dye laser for treating port-wine stains.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Nevus flammeus is a vascular, primarily capillary malformation visible from birth on. In rare cases, it may also affect venous and/or arterial vascular systems of the skin or other organs [1]. It occurs in 0.3%-0.5% of the population [1], i.e. in about 3-4 out of 1000 newborns, and is thus the most frequent vascular malformation in children. The cause is a permanent dilatation of the capillary vessels, which is caused by a lack of sympathetic nerve fibers or a lower density of the same.

First-line therapy of port-wine stains consists of laser treatment with the long-pulsed dye laser [2] with a wavelength of 595nm. Treatment must be performed at least 10 times at intervals of about 8 weeks and leads to lightening and reduction of lesions. In recent years, problems have often arisen in care of port-wine stain patients because dye lasers often failed due to the instability of technology, resulting in treatment delays. Novel long-pulsed KTP lasers may be a sufficient alternative to pulsed dye lasers in treatment of port-wine stains.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Hamburg, Germany, 20246
        • Recruiting
        • Laser Department, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
        • Contact:
          • L Nguyen, MD
          • Phone Number: 040 7410 0

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women 18 years and older
  • Good general health, no relevant previous diseases
  • Presence of one or more port-wine stains
  • Cognitive ability and willingness to give consent (Informed Consent)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 18 years
  • Pregnant and breastfeeding women
  • Significant open wounds or lesions in the region to be treated
  • Missing consent and/or data protection declarations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Potassium Titanyle Phosphate (KTP) Laser
split-side, 1 - 5 sessions at intervals of 6 - 8 weeks
split-side, 1 -5 sessions at intervals of 6 - 8 weeks
Active Comparator: Pulsed Dye Laser
split-side, 1 - 5 sessions at intervals of 6 - 8 weeks
split-side, 1 -5 sessions at intervals of 6 - 8 weeks

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Erythema
Time Frame: at follow-up visit 6 weeks after last treatment session
assessment scale 1 - 7 (normal skin - dark purple) evaluated by physician and blinded investigator
at follow-up visit 6 weeks after last treatment session
area reduction
Time Frame: at follow-up visit 6 weeks after last treatment session
measurement using photo documentation
at follow-up visit 6 weeks after last treatment session

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
patient satisfaction
Time Frame: at follow-up visit 6 weeks after last treatment session
assessment scale 1 - 6 (very - not at all) evaluated by subjects
at follow-up visit 6 weeks after last treatment session

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: L Nguyen, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

August 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 5, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Port-Wine Stain

Clinical Trials on KTP

Subscribe