Permanent Pacing for Drug-refractory Symptomatic Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy. (PACE-OHCM)

March 6, 2023 updated by: Istituto Auxologico Italiano

Permanent Pacing as a Treatment for Drug-refractory Symptomatic Patients With Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.

The present trial is undertaken as a pilot study on selected patients, to evaluate the ability of acute hemodynamic testing to optimize pacing therapy and to predict the response of Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (OHCM) to pacing, in terms of reduction of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) pressure gradient and functional capacity improvement.

The Primary Objective is to demonstrate a long-term reduction in LVOT obstruction at rest and/or after Valsalva/Exercise > 30% in patients responding to acute stimulation test

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

10

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Milan, Italy, 20149
        • Recruiting
        • Istituto Auxologico Italiano
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • unequivocal diagnosis of HCM, on the basis of 2-dimensional echocardiographic demonstration of a hypertrophied (wall thickness >15 mm or > 13 mm in familial HOCM) and non dilated LV in the absence of another cardiac or systemic disease capable of producing the same magnitude of hypertrophy;
  • patients in whom coronary disease has been excluded;
  • presence of severe refractory symptoms (NYHA class II-IV), as evidenced by moderate-to-severe functional disability resulting from exertional dyspnea or chest pain sufficient to support a desire for alternative treatment modalities, following administration (in standard dosages) of beta-blocker and either disopyramide or verapamil, independently or in association;
  • peak instantaneous LV outflow tract gradient > 50 mm Hg (resting or provoked), estimated by continuous wave Doppler;

Exclusion Criteria:

  • end-stage phase of HCM (unless CRT therapy is considered);
  • ejection fraction <50% (unless CRT therapy is considered);
  • severe mitral valve disease (+++) not related to systolic anterior movement and/or papillary muscle abnormalities;
  • age below 18 years.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: HCM patients with LVOT obstruction
Patients with obstructive HCM are considered for this study if 1) symptomatic, 2) refractory to optimized medical therapy and 3) not or poorly* eligible for septal myectomy or with an indication to implant a pacing device (pacemaker or ICD) independent on the ventricular obstruction.
To evaluate the ability of acute hemodynamic testing to optimize pacing therapy and to predict the response of HOCM to pacing

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Reduction of LVOT pressure gradient
Time Frame: 3 months
Long-term reduction in LVOT obstruction at rest and/or after Valsalva/Exercise > 30% in patients responding to acute stimulation test
3 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Clinical improvement: change in NYHA class
Time Frame: 6-12 months
Improvement of NYHA class
6-12 months
Clinical improvement: change in exercise capacity
Time Frame: 6-12 months
6-minutes walking test
6-12 months
Clinical improvement: change in peak VO2
Time Frame: 6-12 months
Improvement in peak VO2
6-12 months
Clinical improvement: change in NT-proBNP concentration
Time Frame: 6-12 months
Reduction in NT-proBNP concentration
6-12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 28, 2018

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 6, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 6, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

Subscribe