Normal Saline Versus Lactated Ringer's Solution for Acute Pancreatitis Resuscitation (WATERLAND)

January 16, 2025 updated by: Enrique de-Madaria

Normal Saline Versus Lactated Ringer's Solution for Acute Pancreatitis Resuscitation, an Open-label Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial: the WATERLAND Trial

Background: Some evidence suggests that fluid resuscitation with lactated Ringer's solution (LR) may have an anti-inflammatory effect on acute pancreatitis (AP) when compared to normal saline (NS), and may be associated with a decrease in severity, but existing single center randomized controlled trials showed conflicting results. The WATERLAND trial aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of fluid resuscitation using LR compared to NS in patients with AP.

Methods: The WATERLAND trial is an international multicenter, open-label, parallel-group, randomized, controlled, superiority trial. Patients will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive LR versus NS-based fluid resuscitation for at least 48 hours. The primary outcome will be moderately severe or severe AP, according to the revision of the Atlanta classification. The secondary objectives of the WATERLAND trial are to determine the effect of LR versus NS fluid resuscitation on several efficacy and safety outcomes in patients with AP.

A total sample of 720 patients, 360 in the LR group and 360 in the NS group, will achieve 90% power to detect a difference between the group proportions of 10%, assuming that the frequency of moderately severe or severe AP in the LR group will be 17%. A loss to follow-up of 10% of patients is expected, so the total sample size will be 396 patients in each treatment arm (792 patients overall). The test statistic used is the two-sided Z test with pooled variance set at a 0.05 significance level.

Discussion: The WATERLAND study aims to improve the early management of AP. Fluid resuscitation is an inexpensive treatment available in any hospital center worldwide. If a better evolution of pancreatitis is demonstrated in one of the treatment arms, it would have important repercussions in the management of this frequent disease.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

The entire protocol is published in open-access format, including the Statistical Analysis plan, in the journal Trials: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-024-08539-2

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

792

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Alicante, Spain, 03010
        • Dr. Balmis General University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is 18 years or older
  • Diagnosis of acute pancreatitis according to the revision of the Atlanta classification (Banks et al, Gut 2013), which requires at least two of the following three criteria: A) typical abdominal pain, B) increase in serum amylase or lipase levels higher than three times the upper limit of normality, and C) signs of acute pancreatitis in imaging
  • Signature of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • New York Heart Association class II heart failure (slight limitation of physical activity; fatigue, palpitations, or dyspnea with ordinal physical activity) or worse, or ejection fraction <50% in the last echocardiography
  • Decompensated cirrhosis (Child's class B or C)
  • Hyper or hyponatremia (<135 or >145 mEq/L)
  • Hyperkalemia (>5 mEq/L)
  • Hypercalcemia (albumin or protein-corrected calcium >10.5 mg/dL or 2.62 mmol/L)
  • Criteria for moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis (revision of the Atlanta classification, Banks et al, Gut 2013) at recruitment: any of the following: A) presence of creatinine ≥1.9 mg/dL or ≥170 mmol/l, B) PaO2/FiO2≤300, C) systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg despite initial fluid resuscitation, D) presence of local complications (acute peripancreatic fluid collections, acute necrotic collection, pseudocyst, walled-off necrosis, gastric outlet dysfunction, splenic or portal vein thrombosis, or colonic necrosis), E) exacerbation of previous comorbidity such as coronary artery disease or chronic lung disease, precipitated by the acute pancreatitis
  • Signs of volume overload or heart failure at recruitment (peripheral edema, pulmonary rales, or increased jugular ingurgitation at 45º)
  • Time from pain onset to arrival to emergency room >24 h
  • Time from confirmation of pancreatitis to randomization >8 h
  • Chronic pancreatitis defined by a Wirsung duct ≥4mm and/or pancreatic calcifications
  • More than 1 previous episode of acute pancreatitis (only 2 episodes of acute pancreatitis are allowed, one of them the present episode)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Lactated Ringer solution (LR)
LR: Lactated Ringer solution. Patients in the LR treatment arm will receive fluid therapy based on lactated Ringer's solution for a minimum of 48 hours.
Patients in the LR (Lactated Ringer solution) treatment arm will receive fluid therapy based on lactated Ringer's solution for a minimum of 48 hours.
Active Comparator: Normal saline (NS)
NS: Normal Saline. Patients in the NS treatment arm will receive fluid therapy based on normal saline for a minimum of 48 hours.
Patients in the NS (Normal Saline) treatment arm will receive fluid therapy based on lactated Ringer's solution for a minimum of 48 hours.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants with moderately severe or severe acute pancreatitis
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Presence of local complications, exacerbation of previous comorbidity or organ failure, according to the definitions of these complications provided by the revised Atlanta Classification (https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779)
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of participants with systemic inflammatory response syndrome
Time Frame: At 24 and 48 hours
At least 2 criteria: A) pulse >90 beats/min, B) respirations >20/min or arterial blood PaCO2 <32 mm Hg, C) temperature <36°C or >38°C, D) white blood cell count <4,000 cells/mm3 or >12,000 cells/mm3 or >10% bands
At 24 and 48 hours
Number of systemic inflammatory response syndrome criteria
Time Frame: At 24 and 48 hours
The criteria are: A) pulse >90 beats/min, B) respirations >20/min or arterial blood PaCO2 <32 mm Hg, C) temperature <36°C or >38°C, D) white blood cell count <4,000 cells/mm3 or >12,000 cells/mm3 or >10% bands
At 24 and 48 hours
Number of participants with local complications
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Presence of acute peripancreatic fluid collections, acute necrotic collection, pseudocyst, walled-off necrosis, gastric outlet dysfunction, splenic or portal vein thrombosis, and colonic necrosis according to the revised Atlanta Classification (https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779).
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Number of participants with necrotizing pancreatitis
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Presence of acute necrotic collections according to the revised Atlanta Classification (https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779).
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Time to oral refeeding
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Days from baseline to oral refeeding
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Number of participants with invasive treatment
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Any of the following: thoracocentesis due to pancreatitis-induced pleural effusion, percutaneous and/or endoscopic drainage of pancreatic or peripancreatic fluid collections or necrosis, endoscopic or surgical necrosectomy, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography due to A) ruptured common bile duct, B) jaundice caused by compression of the common bile duct, C) main pancreatic duct leakage
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Number of participants with nutritional support
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Use of enteral (nasogastric or nasojejunal) or parenteral feeding
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Number of participants with intensive care unit admission
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Admission in the intensive care unit
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Number of participants with exacerbation of coexisting condition
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Exacerbation of pre-existing co-morbidity. The definition provided by the Revised Atlanta Classification is " Exacerbation of pre-existing co-morbidity, such as coronary artery disease or chronic lung disease, precipitated by the acute pancreatitis is defined as a systemic complication. In this document, we distinguish between persistent organ failure (the defining feature of severe acute pancreatitis) and other systemic complications, which are an exacerbation of pre-existing co-morbid disease." (revised Atlanta classification: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779) For the WATERLAND trial we define exacerbation of pre-existing co-morbidity as
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Number of participants with any organ failure
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Definition according to the revised Atlanta classification (https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779): organ failure is defined by the presence of any of the following criteria: A) kidney failure as a creatinine ≥1.9 mg/dL or >170 micromol/L, B) cardiovascular failure as a systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg despite fluid resuscitation, and C) respiratory failure as a PaO2/FIO2≤300
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Number of participants with persistent organ failure
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Organ failure lasting more than 48h (revised Atlanta classification: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779)
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Number of participants with shock
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg despite fluid resuscitation (revised Atlanta classification: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779)
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Number of participants with respiratory failure
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
PaO2/FIO2≤300 (revised Atlanta classification: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779)
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Number of participants with kidney failure
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Creatinine ≥1.9 mg/dL or >170 micromol/L (revised Atlanta classification: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2012-302779)
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Mortality (number of participants)
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Death
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Hospital stay
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Days from recruitment to discharge from index admission
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
C-reactive protein
Time Frame: At 48 hours from randomization
C-reactive protein blood levels
At 48 hours from randomization
Number of participants with hypovolemia
Time Frame: At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
WATERFALL trial criteria for hypovolemia (see https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2202884)
At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
Number of participants with acute kidney injury
Time Frame: At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
KDIGO criteria: increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dL within 48 hr or ≥50% within 7 days or urine output of <0.5 mL/kg/hr for >6 hr (https://doi.org/10.1159/000339789)
At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
Number of participants with hyperkalemia
Time Frame: At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
Venous potassium>5mEq/L
At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
Number of participants with hypercalcemia
Time Frame: At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
Venous calcium corrected by proteins>10.5mg/dL or 2.62 mmol/L
At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
Number of participants with hyperchloremia
Time Frame: At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
Venous chloride>106mEq/L
At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
Number of participants with acidosis
Time Frame: At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
Venous blood pH <7.35
At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
Number of participants with composite safety outcome (primary safety outcome)
Time Frame: At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
Fluid overload or acute kidney injury or hyperkalemia or hypercalcemia or hyperchloremia or acidosis
At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
Number of participants with infection of pancreatic collections or necrosis
Time Frame: From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
Extraluminal gas in the pancreatic and/or peripancreatic tissues on CT scan or when a sample from the collection/necrosis contains pus or is positive for bacteria and/or fungi on Gram stain or culture.
From date of randomization until 30 days after randomization
PAN-PROMISE symptom scale
Time Frame: At 24 and 48 hours (final value and change from baseline)
PAN-PROMISE scale: a 7-symptom scale patient-reported outcome (range, 0 to 10 for each symptom; overall range, 0 to 70, with higher scores indicating higher symptom intensity). Details: https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320729
At 24 and 48 hours (final value and change from baseline)
Number of participants with hyperchloremic acidosis
Time Frame: At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
Patients with venous chloride>106mEq/L and venous blood pH <7.35
At 24 and 48 hours from randomization
Number of participants with fluid overload
Time Frame: From randomization to 72 h thereafter
WATERFALL trial criteria for fluid overload (see https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMoa2202884)
From randomization to 72 h thereafter

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Enrique de-Madaria, MD PhD, Dr. Balmis General University Hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 19, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

September 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 10, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

March 23, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 16, 2025

Last Verified

January 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Members of the ERICA consortium that recruited patients in the WATERLAND trial may claim access to the final dataset to perform post-hoc studies; these proposals will be studied by the steering committee.

IPD Sharing Time Frame

Data will be available upon publication of the main study.

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

  1. Have enrolled patients in the WATERLAND study.
  2. The Steering Committee will evaluate the project and decide whether it is of sufficient scientific quality.

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL
  • SAP
  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE
  • CSR

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Pancreatitis

Clinical Trials on Lactated Ringer Solution

Subscribe