Addressing Vaccine Acceptance in Carceral Settings Through Community Engagement

November 20, 2025 updated by: Yale University
The goal of this study is to reduce morbidity and mortality from COVID-19 amongst people who are detained in and work in correctional facilities. The overall objective is to identify feasible and effective interventions to improve vaccine uptake in correctional facilities and study the effectiveness of these interventions through rapid cycle, cluster randomized trials in the Pennsylvania prison system.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Aim 1: To identify correctional system strategies to address COVID-19 and influenza vaccine acceptance amongst incarcerated people and correctional staff.

Aim 2: To select feasible strategies for a statewide correctional system at the patient-, provider-, practice- and prison-level to address COVID-19 and influenza vaccine uptake through a community engaged research approach.

Aim 3: To compare the effectiveness of interventions to address COVID-19 and influenza vaccine acceptance using a rapid cycle cluster randomized trial design in prison.

This study is highly innovative in its application of rapid cycle, cluster randomized trials in correctional systems to test the effectiveness of strategies identified using a community based participatory research approach. The results will serve as an evidence base for improving vaccine uptake that can be scaled nationally and adapted for other populations affected by the criminal legal system.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

37122

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Schwenksville, Pennsylvania, United States, 19473
        • Recruiting
        • Pennsylvannia Department of Corrections

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All incarcerated people in the Pennsylvania DOC are included in the study population for these low risk interventions. In this each individual intervention, inclusion criteria will be based on where incarcerated people are housed and therefore what intervention they will be exposed to.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Exclusion criteria will likely include severe physical or mental illness as these individuals are often incarcerated in special units which will not be included in the study (i.e. medical units).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Health Services Research
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Treatment as usual
Participants receive standard interventions currently in use (treatment as usual).
Experimental: ADVANCE Steering Committee chosen interventions
Interventions will be selected by the ADVANCE Steering Committee and will be rapidly deployed without additional effort on the part of front-line staff at four distinct levels: patient, provider, practice and prison level. Interventions will be tested one at a time in an iterative process. A participatory, assets-based framework will be used to identify acceptable and feasible strategies to improve vaccine acceptance. Each round of testing will include 1 month of preparation by the steering committee,12-week intervention period, and 2 months for analysis and rapid dissemination.
Interventions will be selected by the ADVANCE Steering Committee and will be rapidly deployed without additional effort on the part of front-line staff at four distinct levels: patient, provider, practice and prison level. Interventions will be tested one at a time in an iterative process. A participatory, assets-based framework will be used to identify acceptable and feasible strategies to improve vaccine acceptance. Each round of testing will include 1 month of preparation by the steering committee,12-week intervention period, and 2 months for analysis and rapid dissemination.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks post intervention
COVID-19 vaccine acceptance rate amongst incarcerated people and correctional staff assessed as the number of participants that receive a COVID-19 vaccine dose or complete the COVID-19 vaccine series by electronic health record (EHR) or self report. This will apply to anyone not fully up-to-date with the full immunization series, which is defined as inclusive of boosters.
up to 12 weeks post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
COVID-19 infections
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks post intervention
Number of participants with COVID-19 infections by EHR or self report.
up to 12 weeks post intervention
Hospitalization Rate
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks post intervention
Total number of new admissions for COVID-19 infections by EHR or self report.
up to 12 weeks post intervention
Deaths
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Number of deaths from COVID-19 infections by EHR
up to 12 weeks
Change in vaccination for other respiratory outbreaks
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks
Change in vaccination rates for other respiratory outbreaks during winter season including influenza vaccine
up to 12 weeks
Vaccine refusal rate
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks post intervention
Vaccine refusal rate assessed by number of vaccines refused/total number fully vaccinated at start of the intervention
up to 12 weeks post intervention
Vaccine acceptance rate
Time Frame: up to 12 weeks post intervention
Vaccine acceptance rate assessed by number of vaccines administered/total number fully vaccinated at start of the intervention
up to 12 weeks post intervention

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lisa B Puglisi, MD, Yale University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 23, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 21, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 3, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 21, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2025

Last Verified

November 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on COVID-19

Subscribe