CEDM as a Screening Tool for Breast Cancer in Higher-risk Women: A Prospective Study

March 21, 2023 updated by: Chen-Pin Chou, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.
To evaluate the effectiveness of Contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in detecting breast cancer in women at higher risk.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of different imaging techniques for detecting breast cancer in women with a higher risk due to personal or family history of the disease.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

351

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Kaohsiung, Taiwan, 813
        • Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women underwent CEDM screening at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital from January 2019 to December 2021

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • women underwent CEDM screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • incomplete imaging exams

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total number of cases received and diagnosed with breast cancer (Number)
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
This refers to the total number of individuals who underwent breast cancer screening or assessment and the number diagnosed with breast cancer. Evaluating the accuracy of screening tests using measures such as true positives and true negatives is crucial for assessing the reliability of screening tests and identifying potential issues. These measures help healthcare professionals make informed decisions about screening and diagnostic strategies.
Up to 3 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Total number of cases received and diagnosed as positive requiring a biopsy and MRI (Number)
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
This refers to the total number of individuals who underwent breast cancer screening or assessment and tested positive, requiring a biopsy and MRI for further evaluation. A biopsy is necessary to confirm whether an individual has breast cancer. Monitoring the diagnostic accuracy of breast cancer screening tests and the number of individuals requiring further procedures is essential for determining appropriate treatment or monitoring. Measures such as true positives and true negatives are used to evaluate the accuracy of screening tests.
Up to 3 years
True positive results obtained by the diagnostic method (Number)
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
The total number of true positive results obtained by the diagnostic method, indicating the cases with breast cancer that are correctly identified. A higher number of true positives demonstrates better performance in correctly identifying cases with breast cancer.
Up to 3 years
True negative results obtained by the diagnostic method (Number)
Time Frame: Up to 3 years
The total number of true negative results obtained by the diagnostic method, indicating the cases without breast cancer that are correctly identified. A higher number of true negatives demonstrates better performance in correctly identifying cases without breast cancer and reducing false positives.
Up to 3 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Chen-Pin Chou, MD, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

December 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 8, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 4, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • VGHKS18-CT11-17

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The data that support the findings of this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author. Some data are not publicly available due to their containing information that could compromise the privacy of research participants.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Breast Cancer

Clinical Trials on CEDM

Subscribe