The Effect of Manual Therapy on Psychological Factors and Quality of Life in Lumbal Disc Herniation Patients

March 27, 2023 updated by: Muş Alparlan University

The Effect of Manual Therapy on Psychological Factors and Quality of Life in Lumbal Disc Herniation Patients: A Single Blind Randomized Clinical Study

When the literature is examined, there are studies examining the relationship between low back pain and anxiety depression, quality of life and LDH in patients with lumbar disc herniation. There are many studies on the clinical use of manual therapy methods in LDH. Most of these studies examine the effect of manual therapy on pain and functional level. However, there are hardly any studies examining the effect of manual therapy on quality of life and psychological factors in LDH patients.

The aim of our study is to examine the effect of mobilization, which is a manual therapy application, on psychological factors (kinesiophobia, pain catastrophic thought, anxiety and depression) and quality of life in LDH patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

There are various treatment options that can be applied to patients with lumbar disc herniation (LDH). These are basically divided into 2 categories: surgical and conservative treatment. Conservative treatment methods in the treatment of LDH aim to prevent the disease from transitioning to interventional methods and / or surgical treatment and to improve the complaints that negatively affect the quality of life. Conservative treatment; It includes informing the patient, bed rest, drug treatments, exercise, thermotherapy, electrotherapy, traction, orthoses, back school and manual therapy applications. Manual therapy; It is used to reduce pain, provide joint and tissue mobility, inhibit sympathetic reflex activity, normalize muscle tone and dissolve adhesions. Manual therapy is the manual treatment of the spine with two different applications such as manipulation and mobilization.

The clinical effects of manual therapy in LDH patients were examined. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of manual therapy on psychological factors and quality of life in patients with lumbar disc herniation.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

32

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Muş, Turkey, 49250
        • Muş Alparslan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • It was determined as being diagnosed with LDH by MR by a physical therapy physician
  • Having pain of at least 3 levels or more according to the Visual Analogue Scale
  • Being between the ages of 18-65.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of spinal surgery
  • History of autoimmune disease (ankylosing spondylitis, rheumatoid arthritis or other)
  • Spondylolysis and spondylolisthesis
  • Spinal fracture
  • Heart pathology
  • History of stroke,
  • Cauda equina syndrome
  • Continuous use of pain medication
  • Spinal inflammation,

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Exercise Group
In our study, stabilization exercises were applied to the patients in the exercise group. The treatment was applied two days a week for five weeks, for a total of ten sessions. After the end of the treatment, stabilization exercises were recommended as a home exercise program until the follow-up evaluation at the third month. A telephone connection was established with the patients once a week and the home program was followed up.Stabilization exercises: It is an approach that is combined with diaphragmatic breathing and activates the passive. The stabilization exercise program was applied in three phases and was progressed in line with the developments in the patients
It is an approach that is combined with diaphragmatic breathing, activating the passive-active musculoskeletal and neural systems. In this approach, transversus abdominis and multifudus muscles are activated as deep core muscles.
Other Names:
  • Stabilization Exercise
Experimental: Manual Therapy Group
In our study, stabilization exercises and spinal mobilization practices were performed to the patients in the manual therapy group. The treatment was applied two days a week for five weeks, for a total of ten sessions. After the end of the treatment, stabilization exercises were recommended as a home exercise program until the follow-up evaluation at the third month. A telephone connection was established with the patients once a week and the home program was followed up.Mobilization applications were applied at Maitland IV degree as standard.Three mobilization methods were applied Anterior-Posterior Lumbal Spinal Mobilization Lumbal Spinal Rotational Mobilization Joint Mobilization in Lumbal Flexion Position
Mobilization applications are passive movements that do not involve pushing or stimuli, applied within the range of motion or up to the physiological range of motion
Other Names:
  • Lumbal Spinal Mobilization

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain Assessment
Time Frame: The change of pain assessed before treatment, through treatment completion, an average of 1 week and during follow-up 3 months after treatment
McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire :It is a questionnaire applied to determine the location, characteristics, relationship with time and severity of low back pain. The total score is obtained by summing the points corresponding to the answer given according to each category. While the maximum score was 78, the minimum score was set to 0. The higher the pain, the higher the score.
The change of pain assessed before treatment, through treatment completion, an average of 1 week and during follow-up 3 months after treatment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety and Depression Assessment
Time Frame: The change of anxiety and depression assessed before treatment, through treatment completion, an average of 1 week and during follow-up 3 months after treatment
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale :It is a self-assessment scale applied to determine the risk of anxiety and depression in the patient, to measure its level and change in severity. It contains a total of 14 questions, seven of which measure anxiety and the other seven measure depression.
The change of anxiety and depression assessed before treatment, through treatment completion, an average of 1 week and during follow-up 3 months after treatment
Kinesiophobia Assessment
Time Frame: The change of anxiety and depression assessed before treatment, through treatment completion, an average of 1 week and during follow-up 3 months after treatment
Tampa Kinesiophobia Scale :Consisting of 17 questions, the scale measures individuals' fear of re-injury with movement. The questions in the scale are calculated with the Likert scoring type consisting of 4 points. Patients are given a minimum score of 17 and a maximum score of 68. The high score obtained as a result of the scale indicates the high degree of kinesiophobia. In studies, 37 points and above are defined as high kinesiophobia.
The change of anxiety and depression assessed before treatment, through treatment completion, an average of 1 week and during follow-up 3 months after treatment
Pain Catastrophizing Assessment
Time Frame: The change of pain catastrophe assessed before treatment, through treatment completion, an average of 1 week and during follow-up 3 months after treatment
Pain Catastrophizing Scale: It reliably assesses certain variables, such as fears, feelings or thoughts, severe pain, disability, and emotional disturbances associated with individuals' past pain experiences. The scale consists of 13 questions scored between 0-4 (0=Never, 1=A little. 2=Moderately, 3=Seriously, 4=Always). An increase in the scale score indicates a high fear of experiencing pain.
The change of pain catastrophe assessed before treatment, through treatment completion, an average of 1 week and during follow-up 3 months after treatment
Quality of Life Assessment
Time Frame: The change of quality of life assessed before treatment, through treatment completion, an average of 1 week and during follow-up 3 months after treatment
Nottingham Health Profile (NHP): It is a valid-reliable quality of life scale used to evaluate the physical, emotional and social effects of diseases on individuals. It consists of six sections, including pain, physical activity, energy, sleep, social isolation and emotional reaction, and a total of 38 questions.
The change of quality of life assessed before treatment, through treatment completion, an average of 1 week and during follow-up 3 months after treatment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Burhan TAŞKAYA, Muş Alparslan University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 15, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 25, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

July 25, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 27, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 7, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 27, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Quality of Life

Clinical Trials on Exercise

Subscribe