- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05808543
BEARS Training Package to Maximise Hearing Abilities in Older Children and Teenagers With Bilateral Cochlear Implants (BEARS)
A Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Spatial-listening Training Delivered Via the Both EARS Training Package (BEARS) in Older Children and Teenagers With Bilateral Cochlear Implants
The goal of the BEARS clinical trial is to determine whether using the directional listening training delivered via the BEARS training package for 3-months alongside usual care compared to only receiving usual care improves speech-in-noise perception, hearing experiences, vocabulary and quality of life and reduces listening effort in young people between 8-16 years old (inclusive) with two cochlear implants.
The participants will complete hearing assessments and questionnaires before completing the 3-month intervention. They will be followed up for the next 9-months through online and in-person appointments.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Deafness is the most frequent human sensory deficit. Cochlear implantation is the primary intervention. Currently over 6000 people have bilateral cochlear implants in the United Kingdom, most of these are children.
Two implants are supposed to provide better access to sound, but it is challenging to interpret and integrate what is heard from both sides. Our 'Living with cochlear implants' Patient and Public Involvement group reported that everyday communication is challenging and tiring, with extra effort required to integrate information from two ears, especially in noise. They reported that current rehabilitation techniques are not engaging, or appropriate to their lifestyles.
To address these issues, we have developed a set of virtual reality games called BEARS (Both EARS). BEARS trains sound localisation and listening in noise. These are skills required in everyday listening.
The aim of this trial is to determine whether using the directional listening training delivered via the BEARS training package for 3-months alongside usual care compared to only receiving usual care improves speech-in-noise perception, hearing experiences, vocabulary and quality of life and reduces listening effort in young people between 8-16 years old (inclusive) with two cochlear implants. The study will be carried out in clinical cochlear implant departments in National Health Service or University hospitals.
Participants will be randomly allocated into one of two groups:
- Receiving the BEARS training package to use for 3-months alongside usual care
- Continue with usual care
The participants will complete hearing assessments and questionnaires before completing the 3-month intervention. They will be followed up for the next 9-months through online and in-person appointments.
Participants and clinicians can also consent to qualitative or process evaluation interviews, which are BEARS sub-studies
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Debi Vickers, PhD
- Phone Number: 01223 760683
- Email: dav1000@medschl.cam.ac.uk
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Liz Arram, MSc
- Email: cctu.bears@ucl.ac.uk
Study Locations
-
-
Birmingham
-
Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, B4 7ET
- Active, not recruiting
- The Midlands Hearing Implant Programme (Children's Service)
-
-
Bradford
-
Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom, BD9 6RJ
- Recruiting
- Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service
-
-
Cambridge
-
Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
- Recruiting
- Emmeline Centre for Hearing Implants
-
-
Kilmarnock
-
Kilmarnock, Kilmarnock, United Kingdom, KA2 0BE
- Recruiting
- Scottish Cochlear Implant Programme
-
-
London
-
London, London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH
- Recruiting
- St Thomas' Hospital Hearing Implant Centre
-
London, London, United Kingdom, SW17 OQT
- Recruiting
- St George's Auditory Implant Service
-
London, London, United Kingdom, WC1E 6DG
- Recruiting
- Auditory Implants: Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals
-
London, London, United Kingdom, WC1N 3JH
- Recruiting
- Great Ormond Street Cochlear Implant Programme
-
-
Manchester
-
Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WL
- Recruiting
- The Richard Ramsden Centre for Hearing Implants
-
-
Middlesborough
-
Middlesbrough, Middlesborough, United Kingdom, TS4 3BW
- Recruiting
- North East Regional Cochlear Implant Programme
-
-
Nottingham
-
Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG1 5DU
- Recruiting
- Nottingham Auditory Implant Programme
-
-
Oxford
-
Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
- Recruiting
- Oxford Auditory Implant Centre
-
-
Southampton
-
Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, SO17 1BJ
- Recruiting
- University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
Participant is a simultaneous or sequential bilateral cochlear implant user*, who either has:
- Congenital severe/profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and have received at least one implant ≤ 36 months of age.
- Progressive or acquired severe/profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (no age at implant restrictions for these patients) *(a bilateral CI user is defined as a patient who uses both cochlear implant processors for a minimum of 6-hours per day over a month)
- Participant has stable programmes (defined as no longer using progressive programmes to work through).
- Participant has had at least two usual care checks/clinical appointments with stable aided levels (+/- 10 dB across 500Hz-4kHz) and no progressive maps to still work through, if they have had re-implantation of internal implant devices.
- Participant is aged 8-16 years, inclusive.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participant (or parent/legal representative) does not speak/understand English sufficiently to undertake assessments.
- Participant has an intellectual disability at a level that would prevent their ability to understand the trial the intervention or assessment questions.
- Participant has a comorbid condition impacting ability to participate in the intervention and/or outcome assessment.
- Participant has an audiological profile impacting ability to participate in the intervention and/or outcome assessments.
- Participant is actively participating in other trials that may affect hearing outcomes or impact their ability to participate in the intervention.
- Participant is currently or anticipated to receive treatment and/or intervention that may affect hearing outcomes or adapt implant settings/programming.
- Participant is refusing to consent to trial activities/protocol.
- Participant is awaiting reimplantation following device failure or infection.
- Participant is a non-user of one or both implant processors (i.e., must use both processors for a minimum of 6 hours per day over a month).
- Participant is a fulltime boarder at a boarding school
- Participant has unresolvable issues found in device checks that render one of the implants unusable.
- Participant is a female that is pregnant.
- Participant has a diagnosis of epilepsy or history of seizures of any kind.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Both EARS training package (BEARS) and Usual Care
BEARS is a compilation of virtual reality games designed specifically for young people with bilateral cochlear implants.
The hardware is either: A Head Mounted Display Device or an iPad with headphones.
|
The BEARS training package comprises of three games addressing different hearing functions: speech-in-noise perception, music listening and sound-source localisation.
Each game is based on an audio-visual task performed through a virtual-reality interface.
Players are guided through on-screen visual prompts to support the gameplay with feedback given on their performance and progress through levels of increasing difficulty.
The BEARS training package design allows for the training to be self-administered, played anywhere and at any time.
There is no upper limit to the frequency of use of the BEARS training package, it is advised to play the games for a minimum of 1 hour a week over a minimum of 2x 30-minute sessions, all three games will need to be played.
This is an annual review appointment with the patient and their clinician.
This could be face-to-face, virtual video consultation, questionnaire, or be cochlear remote care checks.
As a minimum this review will check the following: Microphone covers changed, Reported or recorded device use, all external and internal equipment working (known through no reported or recorded degradation in hearing ability).
During the appointment, the clinician would establish if there were any concerns regarding the cochlear implant functioning and the patient's rehabilitation programme.
They will then make any repairs or adjustments to the device and manage additional support and contact as required.
Between the annual review appointments patients can attend the implant centre for repair appointments or have spare equipment posted.
There is no limit to the level of contact between the patient and the implant centre.
|
|
Active Comparator: Usual Care
Usual care describes the routine rehabilitation received by participants via their implant centre.
|
This is an annual review appointment with the patient and their clinician.
This could be face-to-face, virtual video consultation, questionnaire, or be cochlear remote care checks.
As a minimum this review will check the following: Microphone covers changed, Reported or recorded device use, all external and internal equipment working (known through no reported or recorded degradation in hearing ability).
During the appointment, the clinician would establish if there were any concerns regarding the cochlear implant functioning and the patient's rehabilitation programme.
They will then make any repairs or adjustments to the device and manage additional support and contact as required.
Between the annual review appointments patients can attend the implant centre for repair appointments or have spare equipment posted.
There is no limit to the level of contact between the patient and the implant centre.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Spatial speech in Noise - Virtual Acoustics (SSiN-VA) test outcome
Time Frame: Three months
|
The Primary outcome for the BEARS trial is the difference between the intervention groups in speech-in-noise perception score (% correct overall task) at 3 months, accounting for the participant's baseline score.
This is derived from the spatial speech in noise (SSiN-VA) test.
|
Three months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
SSiN-VA test outcome
Time Frame: Twelve months
|
Speech-in-noise perception score (% correct of the overall task) at twelve months accounting for the baseline score.
|
Twelve months
|
|
SSiN-VA test outcome
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
|
Relative localisation score (% correct) at three months and at twelve months accounting for the baseline score.
|
Three and Twelve Months
|
|
Spatial Adaptive Sentence List (Sp-ASL) test outcomes
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
|
Speech reception threshold at three months and at twelve months, accounting for baseline (for better ear, worse ear, and average of both).
|
Three and Twelve Months
|
|
British Picture Vocabulary Scale (BPVS) test outcome
Time Frame: Twelve Months
|
Difference between arms in vocabulary age at twelve months, accounting for baseline vocabulary age
|
Twelve Months
|
|
Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale: Child self-report version (VFS-C) questionnaire outcome
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
|
Difference between arms in listening-related fatigue score at three and 12 months, accounting for baseline.
|
Three and Twelve Months
|
|
Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale for Children with Impaired Hearing (SSQ) outcome
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
|
Difference between arms in SSQ scores at three and 12 months, accounting for baseline.
|
Three and Twelve Months
|
|
Health Economic outcomes
Time Frame: Twelve Months
|
The economic evaluation will calculate incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained by offering BEARS and usual care, compared to usual care, from an NHS, Personal Social Services (PSS) and Local Education Provider perspective over the twelve months of the trial.
|
Twelve Months
|
|
SSiN-VA test outcome
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
|
Average reaction time (measure of listening effort) for word identification selections at three months and at twelve months accounting for the baseline score.
|
Three and Twelve Months
|
|
SSiN-VA test outcome
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
|
Average reaction time (measure of listening effort) for location shift selection at three months, and at twelve months accounting for the baseline score.
|
Three and Twelve Months
|
|
SSiN-VA test outcome
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
|
Spatial index for word identification at three months and at twelve months accounting for the baseline score.
|
Three and Twelve Months
|
|
SSiN-VA test outcome
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
|
Spatial index for relative localisation at three months and at twelve months accounting for the baseline score.
|
Three and Twelve Months
|
|
Spatial Adaptive Sentence List (Sp-ASL) test outcomes
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
|
Spatial release from masking score at three months and at twelve months, accounting for baseline (for better ear, worse ear, and average of both).
|
Three and Twelve Months
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Age effects
Time Frame: Twelve Months
|
No further data will be collected for the age effect analyses but the data regarding the trajectory of the children's speech-in-noise scores relative to normative age range for the speech measures will be assessed to determine if there is a difference in trajectory over time between the BEARS intervention and Usual Care groups.
|
Twelve Months
|
|
Retention of training effects
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
|
No further data will be collected for the retention effect analyses.
It is considered best practice in training interventions to evaluate if the training effects remain after the intervention period has finished.
For this analysis fixed effects of timepoint (baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months) and group (BEARS intervention, Usual care) and random effect of participant will be used to understand the speech-in-noise outcomes.
|
Three and Twelve Months
|
|
Impact of degree of balance between ears
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
|
For this analysis, the balance app will be used to indicate the degree of symmetry across the two ears.
The balance measurements at baseline, three months and 12 months will be used as an outcome to determine if there have been any changes in the balance between the ears over time.
|
Three and Twelve Months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Vickers D, Salorio-Corbetto M, Driver S, Rocca C, Levtov Y, Sum K, Parmar B, Dritsakis G, Albanell Flores J, Jiang D, Mahon M, Early F, Van Zalk N, Picinali L. Involving Children and Teenagers With Bilateral Cochlear Implants in the Design of the BEARS (Both EARS) Virtual Reality Training Suite Improves Personalization. Front Digit Health. 2021 Nov 12;3:759723. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2021.759723. eCollection 2021.
- Salorio-Corbetto M, Williges B, Lamping W, Picinali L, Vickers D. Evaluating Spatial Hearing Using a Dual-Task Approach in a Virtual-Acoustics Environment. Front Neurosci. 2022 Mar 8;16:787153. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.787153. eCollection 2022.
Helpful Links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 319903
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss
-
MED-EL Elektromedizinische Geräte GesmbHCompletedHearing Loss | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural | Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Hearing Loss, Conductive | Hearing Loss, Unilateral | Hearing Loss, MixedAustria, Germany, United Kingdom
-
Oticon MedicalCompletedEar Diseases | Hearing Loss, Conductive | Hearing Loss Mixed | Hearing Disability | Conductive Hearing Loss | Conductive Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Conductive Hearing Loss, UnilateralUnited Kingdom
-
Oticon MedicalNot yet recruitingSensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Severe | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Profound
-
University of California, San FranciscoPatient-Centered Outcomes Research InstituteRecruitingHearing Loss | Hearing Loss, Sensorineural | Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Hearing Loss, Conductive | Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced | Hearing Loss, Unilateral | Hearing Loss, Mixed | Hearing Disorders in ChildrenUnited States
-
Manchester University NHS Foundation TrustUniversity of ManchesterCompletedCochlear Hearing Loss | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, BilateralUnited Kingdom
-
Truway Health, Inc.Enrolling by invitationSensorineural Hearing Loss | Tinnitus | Sudden Hearing Loss | Acoustic Trauma | Inner Ear Injury | Noise-Induced Hearing Loss | Vestibular DysfunctionUnited States
-
Wonju Severance Christian HospitalRecruitingHearing Loss, Sudden | Sudden Hearing Loss | Hearing Loss, Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural | SSNHL(Sudden Sensory Neural Hearing Loss)Korea, Republic of
-
Envoy Medical CorporationActive, not recruitingSensorineural Hearing Loss | Sensorineural Hearing Loss (Disorder) | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Bilateral | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Severe | Sensorineural Hearing Loss, Profound | Sensori-Neural DeafnessUnited States
-
Oticon MedicalCompletedConductive Hearing Loss | Conductive and Sensori-neural Hearing Loss in the Same Ear | Unilateral, Profound Sensori-neural Hearing LossUnited States
-
Frequency TherapeuticsCompletedHearing Loss, Sensorineural | Presbycusis | Noise Induced Hearing Loss | Sudden Hearing LossUnited States
Clinical Trials on Both EARS training package (BEARS)
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire DijonCompleted
-
Boston Medical CenterRecruitingAutism Spectrum DisorderUnited States
-
San Diego State UniversityNational Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)Not yet recruitingOccupational Exposure | Noise Exposure | Hearing Loss, Noise-InducedUnited States
-
University of St AndrewsNHS Lothian; Breast Cancer NowUnknownBreast CancerUnited Kingdom
-
Alexandria UniversityCompleted
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompletedStroke | Gait, Hemiplegic | Behavior and Behavior MechanismsUnited States
-
University of CopenhagenRadboud University Medical Center; University of Leeds; Johannes Gutenberg University... and other collaboratorsCompletedPhysical Activity | Immobilization, TonicDenmark
-
Imperial College LondonOak FoundationCompletedEnd of Life | Support, FamilyUnited Kingdom
-
University of Alabama at BirminghamCompleted
-
Royal College of Surgeons, IrelandTallaght University HospitalCompletedCritical Illness | Critical Illness MyopathyIreland