BEARS Training Package to Maximise Hearing Abilities in Older Children and Teenagers With Bilateral Cochlear Implants (BEARS)

A Randomised Controlled Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Spatial-listening Training Delivered Via the Both EARS Training Package (BEARS) in Older Children and Teenagers With Bilateral Cochlear Implants

The goal of the BEARS clinical trial is to determine whether using the directional listening training delivered via the BEARS training package for 3-months alongside usual care compared to only receiving usual care improves speech-in-noise perception, hearing experiences, vocabulary and quality of life and reduces listening effort in young people between 8-16 years old (inclusive) with two cochlear implants.

The participants will complete hearing assessments and questionnaires before completing the 3-month intervention. They will be followed up for the next 9-months through online and in-person appointments.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Deafness is the most frequent human sensory deficit. Cochlear implantation is the primary intervention. Currently over 6000 people have bilateral cochlear implants in the United Kingdom, most of these are children.

Two implants are supposed to provide better access to sound, but it is challenging to interpret and integrate what is heard from both sides. Our 'Living with cochlear implants' Patient and Public Involvement group reported that everyday communication is challenging and tiring, with extra effort required to integrate information from two ears, especially in noise. They reported that current rehabilitation techniques are not engaging, or appropriate to their lifestyles.

To address these issues, we have developed a set of virtual reality games called BEARS (Both EARS). BEARS trains sound localisation and listening in noise. These are skills required in everyday listening.

The aim of this trial is to determine whether using the directional listening training delivered via the BEARS training package for 3-months alongside usual care compared to only receiving usual care improves speech-in-noise perception, hearing experiences, vocabulary and quality of life and reduces listening effort in young people between 8-16 years old (inclusive) with two cochlear implants. The study will be carried out in clinical cochlear implant departments in National Health Service or University hospitals.

Participants will be randomly allocated into one of two groups:

  1. Receiving the BEARS training package to use for 3-months alongside usual care
  2. Continue with usual care

The participants will complete hearing assessments and questionnaires before completing the 3-month intervention. They will be followed up for the next 9-months through online and in-person appointments.

Participants and clinicians can also consent to qualitative or process evaluation interviews, which are BEARS sub-studies

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

272

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Birmingham
      • Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, B4 7ET
        • Active, not recruiting
        • The Midlands Hearing Implant Programme (Children's Service)
    • Bradford
      • Bradford, Bradford, United Kingdom, BD9 6RJ
        • Recruiting
        • Yorkshire Auditory Implant Service
    • Cambridge
      • Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom, CB2 0QQ
        • Recruiting
        • Emmeline Centre for Hearing Implants
    • Kilmarnock
      • Kilmarnock, Kilmarnock, United Kingdom, KA2 0BE
        • Recruiting
        • Scottish Cochlear Implant Programme
    • London
      • London, London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH
        • Recruiting
        • St Thomas' Hospital Hearing Implant Centre
      • London, London, United Kingdom, SW17 OQT
        • Recruiting
        • St George's Auditory Implant Service
      • London, London, United Kingdom, WC1E 6DG
        • Recruiting
        • Auditory Implants: Royal National ENT and Eastman Dental Hospitals
      • London, London, United Kingdom, WC1N 3JH
        • Recruiting
        • Great Ormond Street Cochlear Implant Programme
    • Manchester
      • Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom, M13 9WL
        • Recruiting
        • The Richard Ramsden Centre for Hearing Implants
    • Middlesborough
      • Middlesbrough, Middlesborough, United Kingdom, TS4 3BW
        • Recruiting
        • North East Regional Cochlear Implant Programme
    • Nottingham
      • Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG1 5DU
        • Recruiting
        • Nottingham Auditory Implant Programme
    • Oxford
      • Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom, OX3 9DU
        • Recruiting
        • Oxford Auditory Implant Centre
    • Southampton
      • Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom, SO17 1BJ
        • Recruiting
        • University of Southampton Auditory Implant Service

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant is a simultaneous or sequential bilateral cochlear implant user*, who either has:

    1. Congenital severe/profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss and have received at least one implant ≤ 36 months of age.
    2. Progressive or acquired severe/profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (no age at implant restrictions for these patients) *(a bilateral CI user is defined as a patient who uses both cochlear implant processors for a minimum of 6-hours per day over a month)
  2. Participant has stable programmes (defined as no longer using progressive programmes to work through).
  3. Participant has had at least two usual care checks/clinical appointments with stable aided levels (+/- 10 dB across 500Hz-4kHz) and no progressive maps to still work through, if they have had re-implantation of internal implant devices.
  4. Participant is aged 8-16 years, inclusive.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant (or parent/legal representative) does not speak/understand English sufficiently to undertake assessments.
  2. Participant has an intellectual disability at a level that would prevent their ability to understand the trial the intervention or assessment questions.
  3. Participant has a comorbid condition impacting ability to participate in the intervention and/or outcome assessment.
  4. Participant has an audiological profile impacting ability to participate in the intervention and/or outcome assessments.
  5. Participant is actively participating in other trials that may affect hearing outcomes or impact their ability to participate in the intervention.
  6. Participant is currently or anticipated to receive treatment and/or intervention that may affect hearing outcomes or adapt implant settings/programming.
  7. Participant is refusing to consent to trial activities/protocol.
  8. Participant is awaiting reimplantation following device failure or infection.
  9. Participant is a non-user of one or both implant processors (i.e., must use both processors for a minimum of 6 hours per day over a month).
  10. Participant is a fulltime boarder at a boarding school
  11. Participant has unresolvable issues found in device checks that render one of the implants unusable.
  12. Participant is a female that is pregnant.
  13. Participant has a diagnosis of epilepsy or history of seizures of any kind.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Both EARS training package (BEARS) and Usual Care
BEARS is a compilation of virtual reality games designed specifically for young people with bilateral cochlear implants. The hardware is either: A Head Mounted Display Device or an iPad with headphones.
The BEARS training package comprises of three games addressing different hearing functions: speech-in-noise perception, music listening and sound-source localisation. Each game is based on an audio-visual task performed through a virtual-reality interface. Players are guided through on-screen visual prompts to support the gameplay with feedback given on their performance and progress through levels of increasing difficulty. The BEARS training package design allows for the training to be self-administered, played anywhere and at any time. There is no upper limit to the frequency of use of the BEARS training package, it is advised to play the games for a minimum of 1 hour a week over a minimum of 2x 30-minute sessions, all three games will need to be played.
This is an annual review appointment with the patient and their clinician. This could be face-to-face, virtual video consultation, questionnaire, or be cochlear remote care checks. As a minimum this review will check the following: Microphone covers changed, Reported or recorded device use, all external and internal equipment working (known through no reported or recorded degradation in hearing ability). During the appointment, the clinician would establish if there were any concerns regarding the cochlear implant functioning and the patient's rehabilitation programme. They will then make any repairs or adjustments to the device and manage additional support and contact as required. Between the annual review appointments patients can attend the implant centre for repair appointments or have spare equipment posted. There is no limit to the level of contact between the patient and the implant centre.
Active Comparator: Usual Care
Usual care describes the routine rehabilitation received by participants via their implant centre.
This is an annual review appointment with the patient and their clinician. This could be face-to-face, virtual video consultation, questionnaire, or be cochlear remote care checks. As a minimum this review will check the following: Microphone covers changed, Reported or recorded device use, all external and internal equipment working (known through no reported or recorded degradation in hearing ability). During the appointment, the clinician would establish if there were any concerns regarding the cochlear implant functioning and the patient's rehabilitation programme. They will then make any repairs or adjustments to the device and manage additional support and contact as required. Between the annual review appointments patients can attend the implant centre for repair appointments or have spare equipment posted. There is no limit to the level of contact between the patient and the implant centre.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Spatial speech in Noise - Virtual Acoustics (SSiN-VA) test outcome
Time Frame: Three months
The Primary outcome for the BEARS trial is the difference between the intervention groups in speech-in-noise perception score (% correct overall task) at 3 months, accounting for the participant's baseline score. This is derived from the spatial speech in noise (SSiN-VA) test.
Three months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
SSiN-VA test outcome
Time Frame: Twelve months
Speech-in-noise perception score (% correct of the overall task) at twelve months accounting for the baseline score.
Twelve months
SSiN-VA test outcome
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
Relative localisation score (% correct) at three months and at twelve months accounting for the baseline score.
Three and Twelve Months
Spatial Adaptive Sentence List (Sp-ASL) test outcomes
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
Speech reception threshold at three months and at twelve months, accounting for baseline (for better ear, worse ear, and average of both).
Three and Twelve Months
British Picture Vocabulary Scale (BPVS) test outcome
Time Frame: Twelve Months
Difference between arms in vocabulary age at twelve months, accounting for baseline vocabulary age
Twelve Months
Vanderbilt Fatigue Scale: Child self-report version (VFS-C) questionnaire outcome
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
Difference between arms in listening-related fatigue score at three and 12 months, accounting for baseline.
Three and Twelve Months
Speech, Spatial, and Qualities of Hearing Scale for Children with Impaired Hearing (SSQ) outcome
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
Difference between arms in SSQ scores at three and 12 months, accounting for baseline.
Three and Twelve Months
Health Economic outcomes
Time Frame: Twelve Months
The economic evaluation will calculate incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained by offering BEARS and usual care, compared to usual care, from an NHS, Personal Social Services (PSS) and Local Education Provider perspective over the twelve months of the trial.
Twelve Months
SSiN-VA test outcome
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
Average reaction time (measure of listening effort) for word identification selections at three months and at twelve months accounting for the baseline score.
Three and Twelve Months
SSiN-VA test outcome
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
Average reaction time (measure of listening effort) for location shift selection at three months, and at twelve months accounting for the baseline score.
Three and Twelve Months
SSiN-VA test outcome
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
Spatial index for word identification at three months and at twelve months accounting for the baseline score.
Three and Twelve Months
SSiN-VA test outcome
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
Spatial index for relative localisation at three months and at twelve months accounting for the baseline score.
Three and Twelve Months
Spatial Adaptive Sentence List (Sp-ASL) test outcomes
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
Spatial release from masking score at three months and at twelve months, accounting for baseline (for better ear, worse ear, and average of both).
Three and Twelve Months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Age effects
Time Frame: Twelve Months
No further data will be collected for the age effect analyses but the data regarding the trajectory of the children's speech-in-noise scores relative to normative age range for the speech measures will be assessed to determine if there is a difference in trajectory over time between the BEARS intervention and Usual Care groups.
Twelve Months
Retention of training effects
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
No further data will be collected for the retention effect analyses. It is considered best practice in training interventions to evaluate if the training effects remain after the intervention period has finished. For this analysis fixed effects of timepoint (baseline, 3, 6, 9 and 12 months) and group (BEARS intervention, Usual care) and random effect of participant will be used to understand the speech-in-noise outcomes.
Three and Twelve Months
Impact of degree of balance between ears
Time Frame: Three and Twelve Months
For this analysis, the balance app will be used to indicate the degree of symmetry across the two ears. The balance measurements at baseline, three months and 12 months will be used as an outcome to determine if there have been any changes in the balance between the ears over time.
Three and Twelve Months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Helpful Links

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 27, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

October 31, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 17, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 30, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 11, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 1, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 26, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Sharing Time Frame

First year of the trial opening

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

Open access

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hearing Loss

Clinical Trials on Both EARS training package (BEARS)

Subscribe