Intraoperative Intraabdominal Ultrasound for Endometriosis

March 31, 2023 updated by: Andrea Etrusco, University of Palermo

The Diagnostic Value of the Intraoperative Intraabdominal Ultrasound for Deep Bowel Endometriosis

The diagnosis of bowel endometriosis lesions is in most cases a combination of anamnesis, clinical exam, transvaginal ultrasound (and/or MRI and/or endorectal sonography) and laparoscopy.

Both the transvaginal ultrasound as well as the MRI have showed a great accuracy with very good sensititivity and specificity regarding the imaging diagnosis of bowel endometriosis.

The conventional laparoscopy contributes to the diagnosis of bowel endometriosis by visualizing the nodules and palpating the deep endometriosis nodule using the instruments, therefor offering the surgeon a haptic feedback by grasping, pushing and rolling the bowel wall and the nodules. Horace Roman and Dan Martin showed that 25% of patients undergoing a conventional laparoscopic segmental bowel resection with a minilaparotomy hat palpable non-visualized endometriosis nodules. These nodules could be directly palpated with the hands because the bowel was exteriorized through the minilaparotomy. The direct palpation of the bowel offers of course a superior haptic feedback compared to the haptic feedback offered by the laparoscopic palpation using the instruments. However this was a direct palpation of only the oral part of the bowel. The aboral part of the bowel caudal to the staple line could not be evaluated by direct palpation. New surgical techniques for the segmental bowel resection with transvaginal/transanal NOSE(natural orifice specimen extraction) have been described in the last years. The novel techniques avoid the minilaparotomy and assure a 100% minimal invasive approach offering better esthetic outcomes.

However in such cases a direct palpation of the bowel wall using the hands in order to identify non- visualizable nodules is not possible as the bowel remains the whole time of the procedure inside of the abdomen. On the other side the robotic-assisted laparoscopy doesn't offer the surgeon a haptic feedback at all. In these cases the surgeon has to rely on the visual aspects of the lesions and therefor "touch" the lesions with his eyes - the visual information should replace the haptic feedback. So in the case of a robotic assisted laparoscopic segemental bowel resection with a NOSE it is not possible to palpate the bowel at all - neither with instruments, not with the hands. Other surgical techniques used to excise smaller colorectal nodules are the rectal shaving and the full thickness excision (disc excision) using a circular stapler. In these situations the surgeon has to rely exclusively on the visual information as well on the haptic feedback given by the conventional laparoscopic instruments. In more than 30% of the cases of full thickness rectal resection the resection the margins are infiltrated by the endometriosis nodules. All the above mentioned situations raise the question of the radicallity in terms of healthy resection margins and of multifocal lesions that cannot be visualized and/or palpated. In this study we are evaluating the diagnostic value of the intraoperative intraabdominal ultrasound for deep infiltrating colorectal endometriosis.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

70

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Hamburg, Germany, 22457
        • Recruiting
        • Albertinen Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Women affected by deep bowel endometriosis undergoing intraabdominal ultrasound.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All the patients with suspicion of endometriosis who undergo surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients under 18 years old;
  • Patients who didn't sign the informed consent.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Women with suspicion of deep bowel endometriosis
Women with suspicion of deep bowel endometriosis undergoing intraoperative ultrasound to assess its diagnostic value for endometriosis patients as well as the predictive potential of changing the therapeutic strategy during the surgery based on the ultrasound findings.
To assess the diagnostic value of the intraoperative intrabaabdominal ultrasound (IIUS) for endometriosis patients as well as the predictive potential of changing the therapeutic strategy during the surgery based on the ultrasound findings.
Other Names:
  • Laparoscopic visualization
  • Laparoscopic palpation
  • Direct palpation in case of a conventional segmental bowel resection with specimen extraction per minilaparotomy.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Accuracy of IIUS compared to TVS regarding the colorectal endometriosis
Time Frame: At the moment of the surgery
Compare the dimmensions of preop. TVS-diagnosed nodules with the intraop. IUS dimensions.
At the moment of the surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Andrea Etrusco, M.D., University of Palermo
  • Principal Investigator: Alin Constantin, M.D., Albertinen Hospital Hamburg
  • Study Director: Antonio Simone Laganà, M.D. Ph.D., University of Palermo
  • Study Chair: Vito Chiantera, M.D. Ph.D., University of Palermo

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 14, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 31, 2023

Last Verified

March 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • INTA-US-ENDO

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Endometriosis

Clinical Trials on Intraabdominal ultrasound

Subscribe