Omitting Drains After Repair of Peptic Ulcer Perforations

October 12, 2023 updated by: Mohammed Elshwadfy Nageeb, Cairo University

Omitting of Usage of Intraabdominal Drains After Repair of Peptic Ulcer Perforations Compared to Traditional Use of Drains; Comparative Study

. This study aimed to evaluate ERAS application outcomes via omitting the intraabdominal drains compared to regular using of the drains in patients undergoing perforated duodenal ulcer repairs in emergency abdominal surgeries.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups. In Group A : the investigators will put intraabdominal drains, and in Group ,thd investigators will not put any intraabdominal drains. Our primary outcomes will be hospital stayl engthand pain score;Data analysis packages will be SPSS version 21 Qualitative data will be presented by number and percentage, quantitative data by mean, standard deviation, median and interquartile range.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

- Patients older than 18 years with perforated peptic ulcer who underwent exploratory laparotomy or laparoscopy and repair with omental pedicle techniques will included in the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • preoperative shock on admission.

    • Delayed presentation more than 24 hours.
    • known malignant gastric ulcers confirmed by histopathology.
    • the presence of neuropsychiatric disease, pregnant and lactating women.
    • predisposing factors for impaired wound healing (e.g., currently using immunosuppressive agents, or chronic use of steroids), the presence of HIV/AIDS.
    • Intraoperative findings consistent with malignant ulcers. • American Society of Anesthesiologists grade III/IV, or had an alternative perioperative diagnosis. • Ulcer size more than 2 cm in diameter.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Drain group
In Group A the investigators will put intraabdominal drains
The investigators will put intraabdominal drains
Experimental: No drain group
The investigators will not put any intraabdominal drains
omitting the intraabdominal drains

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of days of hospital stay
Time Frame: Up to 30 days
hospital stay length
Up to 30 days
number of patients with infection-related postoperative complications such as superficial, deep or organ space SSI, hospital acquired pneumonia
Time Frame: 30 days
number of patients with infection-related postoperative complications such as superficial, deep or organ space SSI, hospital acquired pneumonia
30 days
incidence of Post operative repair leak
Time Frame: 30 days
incidence of Post operative repair leak
30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of days before frist bowel motion
Time Frame: 7 days
number of days before frist bowel motion
7 days
severity of operative pain measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS
Time Frame: 7 days
from 1 to 10 1 indicated minimum pain and 10 maximum pain
7 days
INCIDENCE OF postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONAV
Time Frame: 7 days
INCIDENCE OF postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONAV
7 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mohammed ElShwadfy, Cairo University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 25, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 25, 2023

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 25, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 9, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 16, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 12, 2023

Last Verified

October 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Peptic Ulcer Perforations

Clinical Trials on Using intraabdominal drains

3
Subscribe