Evaluation of the Effect of Dextrose Prolotherapy Versus Dry Needling Therapy

May 2, 2024 updated by: Ahmed Nagi Alghandour, Beni-Suef University

Evaluation of the Effect of Dextrose Prolotherapy Versus Dry Needling Therapy for the Treatment of Temporomandibular Joint Anterior Disc Displacement With Reduction (A Randomized Controlled Trial)

The hypertonic dextrose injection; Prolotherapy is a proliferation injection therapy that aims to trigger a low-grade inflammatory response inside the (TMJ), with the resultant captivation of abundant fibroblasts that regenerate and strengthen the tendinous and ligamentous attachments and stabilize the disc and the fibro-osseous junctions.

On the other hand, dry needling' refers to the insertion of needles without the use of injectate. Dry needling is beneficial for treating a variety of neuromusculoskeletal pain syndromes as it represents a treatment modality for the ligaments and tendons, muscles, subcutaneous fascia, peripheral nerves, and neurovascular bundles. Deep dry needling (DDN) is a technique that utilizes the Intracapsular insertion of dry needles to approach the discal insertion to the lateral pterygoid muscle and the masseteric muscle origin, along the zygomatic bone and arch, aiming to inactivate the muscular trigger points (TPs).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The Temporomandibular joint (TMJ) represents the most complex synovial articulation in the human body, with its articular disc enclosed between the articular tubercle's slope and the convexity of the mandibular condyle.

Although the Magnetic resonance interpretation of the normal discal position defines the posterior discal band atop the highest convexity of the mandibular condyle, at a 12 o'clock position, this discal disposal is altered in almost 30% of the population without physical signs. Which rendered the treatment of the discal displacement mainly dependent on alleviating the signs and symptoms rather than restoring the anatomical disc position.

Various non-invasive therapeutic modalities are utilized for relieving the signs and symptoms of anterior discal displacement, including physical therapy, exercises, ischemic compression, heat therapy, acupuncture, dry needling, wet needling injections with different agents, and pharmacological treatments.

Among those, the trigger point injection is an effective modality, with or without the injection of saline or ringer's solutions, hyaluronic acid, corticosteroids, local anesthetics, botulinum toxin, platelet-rich plasma, or hypertonic dextrose The current study aims to design a randomized controlled trial that compares the effect of injecting 12.5 % of dextrose solution intraarticular and into the myofascial trigger points versus the dry needling of the same sites on alleviating the clinical signs and symptoms of (TMJ) disc displacement with reduction.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Banī Suwayf, Egypt
        • Beni-Suef University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients of both genders with an age group of 18-45 years.
  2. Those patients with the radiographic interpretation of temporomandibular joint disc displacement with reduction (MRI) and the clinical signs of pain, limitation of mouth opening, and TMJ clicking.
  3. The presence of associated myofascial pain with masseteric trigger points (TPs)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Any previous temporomandibular joint treatment.
  2. Any systemic disease affecting the temporomandibular joint's anatomy, mechanical function, or outcome of the proposed treatment.
  3. Those Patients with a history of allergic reactions to any components of the injectable solution

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: The Study group
The patients within the study group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point injection of a solution that contains (0.75 ml. 12.5% Dextrose solution, 0.75 ml. Saline solution, and 1.5 ml. Lidocaine).
The patients within the study group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point injection of a solution that contains (0.75 ml. 12.5% Dextrose solution, 0.75 ml. Saline solution, and 1.5 ml. Lidocaine). Each patient will receive four injections at two-week intervals, aided by a 25 gauge needle connected to a 3 ml. plastic syringe.
Other: The Control group
Patients in the control group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point dry needle insertion without injecting any solution.

The Control group:

Patients in the control group will receive intraarticular TMJ and masseteric Trigger point dry needle insertion without injecting any solution. Each patient will receive four dry needle insertions at two-week intervals, aided by a 25-gauge and 3.8 cm length needle.

i.e., All the patients will be subjected to intraarticular needle insertion. However, only the patients within the study group will be injected with the Dextrose Prolotherapy solution.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain threshold
Time Frame: 8 months
by using visual analogue scale from 0 to 10 which 10 is the worst pain
8 months
Interincisal opening
Time Frame: 8 months
distance by cm caliber from the between the anterior teeth at the maximal unassisted nonpainful opening of the patient.
8 months
clicking
Time Frame: 8 months
(evident or not)
8 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 29, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 20, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 3, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2024

Last Verified

May 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Temporomandibular Joint Disorders

Clinical Trials on The study group

Subscribe