- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05825079
Does Weightbearing Crutch Technology Impact Patient Compliance?
January 2, 2026 updated by: NYU Langone Health
A Randomized, Parallel, Two Arm, Unblinded Single-center Study of the Effects of Patient-provided Feedback on Fracture Healing and Weight-bearing Status in Orthopedic Patients Undergoing Operative Fixation or Non-operative Treatment of Isolated Tibial Plateau, Pilon, and Other Ankle Fractures
The goal of this study is to determine if weight-bearing crutch technology that delivers active feedback to patients during their treatment will impact patient compliance with physician instructions.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
20
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States, 10016
- NYU Langone Health
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Willing and able to participate in study and complete consent
- Will undergo treatment of an isolated tibial plateau, pilon, or ankle fracture and placed in a non-weightbearing status with the use of crutches at NYU.
- Have access and use of a mobile phone (exclusively iOS and/or Android devices)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with concomitant TBI
- Polytrauma patients
- Pathologic fractures
- Prisoners
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Weight-Bearing Feedback Delivered to Mobile Phone
The weight-bearing tracking system is attached to the patient's crutch and calculates how much weight is being put on the crutch.
Feedback of this data can be delivered to the patient through a mobile phone application.
For Arm A of the study, feedback is delivered to the patient's paired mobile phone, providing them information on how much weight they are exerting on their crutch/injured lower extremity.
|
Feedback on how much weight patients are exerting on their crutch/injured lower extremity (measured via Smart Crutch Tip) will be delivered to their mobile phones.
The device is attached to the crutch and measures how much weight-bearing load is exerted onto its axis.
The device is capable of transmitting this data into the patient and physicians' user interface.
|
|
Active Comparator: No Weight-Bearing Feedback
The weight-bearing tracking system is attached to the patient's crutch and calculates how much weight is being put on the crutch.
For Arm B, no feedback about weight-bearing status is delivered to the patient.
|
The device is attached to the crutch and measures how much weight-bearing load is exerted onto its axis.
The device is capable of transmitting this data into the patient and physicians' user interface.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percent (%) Change in Average Weight On Crutch from Week 2 to Week 12
Time Frame: Week 2, Week 12
|
Average weight put on crutch measured using the Smart Crutch Tip.
|
Week 2, Week 12
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Recovery
Time Frame: Up to Week 12
|
Measured as the duration of time from treatment (operative or non-operative) to recovery.
|
Up to Week 12
|
|
Change in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) - Pain Score from Baseline to Week 12
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 12
|
Participants rate pain using a VAS ranging from 0 (no hurt) to 10 (unbearable pain).
A decrease in scores indicates pain decreased during the observational period.
|
Baseline, Week 12
|
|
Percent (%) of Participants with Injury Complications
Time Frame: Up to Week 12
|
Up to Week 12
|
|
|
Percent (%) of Participants who Experience Nonunion/Malunion of Lower Extremity Injury
Time Frame: Up to Week 12
|
Nonunion/malunion assessed using radiographic imaging.
|
Up to Week 12
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Kenneth A. Egol, MD, NYU Langone Health
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
June 9, 2023
Primary Completion (Actual)
July 28, 2025
Study Completion (Actual)
July 28, 2025
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 11, 2023
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
April 11, 2023
First Posted (Actual)
April 24, 2023
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
January 6, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
January 2, 2026
Last Verified
January 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- 22-01427
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
YES
IPD Plan Description
The de-identified participant data from the final research dataset used in the published manuscript will be shared upon reasonable request beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research provided the investigator who proposes to use the data executes a data use agreement with NYU Langone Health.
Requests may be directed to: Kenneth.Egol@nyulangone.org.
The protocol and statistical analysis plan will be made available on Clinicaltrials.gov
only as required by federal regulation or as a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
The investigator who proposed to use the data will be granted access upon reasonable request.
equests should be directed to Kenneth.Egol@nyulangone.org.
To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- STUDY_PROTOCOL
- SAP
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Fracture Healing
-
AmgenUCB PharmaCompletedFracture HealingCanada, Italy, United States, Russian Federation, France, Germany, Hong Kong, Hungary, Australia, Bulgaria, Poland, Romania, Greece, Denmark, Estonia, India, New Zealand, United Kingdom, Latvia, Slovakia, Lithuania, Mexico, Norway
-
Indonesia UniversityUnknownHealing of FractureIndonesia
-
AmgenCompletedFracture HealingFinland, Italy, Sweden, United States, Belgium, Switzerland, Canada, Hong Kong, Hungary, Germany, Netherlands, Bulgaria, Australia, Poland, Greece, Denmark, United Kingdom, Estonia, India, New Zealand, Latvia, Lithuania, Argentina, Sl...
-
University of South CarolinaWashington University School of MedicineNot yet recruitingStress Fracture | Fracture Healing | Military TrainingUnited States
-
Children's Fractures Interest Group, DenmarkRecruitingChild, Only | Implant Complication | Forearm Fracture | Fracture Healing | Fracture Fixation, IntramedullaryDenmark
-
Technical University of MunichCompletedFracture, Closed, Comminuted, HealingGermany
-
Chinese University of Hong KongCompletedFracture, Closed, Comminuted, HealingChina
-
Bone Therapeutics S.ACompletedBone Fracture | Validation Studies | Fracture Healing | X-Ray | Delayed Union Fracture | CT-scanGermany
-
Medical University InnsbruckETH Zurich; University Hospital UlmCompletedDistal Radius Fracture | Fracture Healing
-
GlaxoSmithKlineTerminatedFracture HealingRussian Federation, Argentina, Hong Kong, Netherlands, Spain, Taiwan, Korea, Republic of, Australia, United Kingdom, Czech Republic, South Africa, Romania, Sweden
Clinical Trials on Weight-Bearing Feedback
-
Allegheny Singer Research Institute (also known...TerminatedFoot and Ankle SurgeryUnited States
-
Taipei Medical UniversityUnknownOsteoarthritisTaiwan
-
Maastricht University Medical CenterRecruitingTrauma Injury | Calcaneus Fracture | Displaced Intra-Articular Fracture of Calcaneus (Diagnosis)Netherlands
-
University of Mississippi Medical CenterNot yet recruitingAcetabulum Fractures | Pelvis FracturesUnited States, Canada
-
Maimonides Medical CenterJohnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C.RecruitingAnkle Fractures | Syndesmotic Injuries | Bimalleolar Fractures | Trimalleolar Fractures | Ankle Dislocation | Bimalleolar Equivalent Fracture | Maisonneuve FractureUnited States
-
Cantonal Hospital of St. GallenNot yet recruitingPost Operative Treatment After Unstable Malleolar FracturesSwitzerland
-
Hospices Civils de LyonCompletedOsteoarthritis, KneeFrance
-
Panam ClinicRecruitingFemoro Acetabular ImpingementCanada
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedTotal Hip ReplacementPakistan
-
St. Louis UniversityCompletedDistal Femur FracturesUnited States