- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05843890
Tailored Pain Guide (TPG) Study
This research is studying whether changing an individual's behaviors may have an impact as a treatment or outcome for chronic low back pain. This research will try to understand how much an electronic, self-management website like PainGuide can help participants.
The study hypothesizes that tailored digital interventions (plus using PainGuide) will demonstrate greater improvement in pain interference.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
There was an amendment approved by the University of Michigan Medical School Institutional Review Board (AME00158411). This amendment included the following:
increased enrollment numbers, updated recruitment procedures including the Non-Pharma Program (NPP) Sub-Study, as well as changes in time frames.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Beth Banner
- Phone Number: 734-998-5837
- Email: eledward@umich.edu
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Sana Shaikh
- Phone Number: 734-763-5226
- Email: skazi@med.umich.edu
Study Locations
-
-
Michigan
-
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States, 48109
- Recruiting
- University of Michigan
-
Contact:
- Beth Banner
- Phone Number: 734-998-5837
- Email: eledward@umich.edu
-
Principal Investigator:
- Daniel Clauw, MD
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Chronic Lower Back pain (cLBP) defined by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) Task Force Report on Research Standards for Chronic Low Back Pain, (i.e., low back pain present at least six months, and present more than half of those days.)
- Individuals must have a score of greater or equal to (≥) 60 on PROMIS Pain Interference.
Non-Pharma Sub-study:
- Must be referred and currently on the waitlist for the NPP at the Back & Pain Center (BPC)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current cancer related pain
- Diagnosis of autoimmune disease
- Unable to speak, write or read English
- Visual or hearing difficulties
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Any other diseases or conditions that would make a patient unsuitable for study participation as determined by the site principal investigators.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Structured and tailored PainGuide
|
Participants will receive specific instruction to complete one module a week over the first 4 weeks. Participants will then receive tailored messaging using scores from the assessments completed during T1(baseline visit) from the PROMIS 29+2. The initial group of participants (prior to AME00158411) will complete surveys for 24 weeks. The NPP Participants will be asked to complete surveys for 52 weeks. All participants will also be registered with a Fitbit device that is linked to the PainGuide to capture movement data (daily step counts). |
|
Active Comparator: Standard PainGuide
|
Participants in the control group will not receive any messaging once enrolled. The initial group of participants (prior to AME00158411) will complete surveys for 24 weeks. The NPP Participants will be asked to complete surveys for 52 weeks. All participants will also be registered with a Fitbit device that is linked to the PainGuide to capture movement data (daily step counts). |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Pain Interference score
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24
|
The PROMIS Pain Interference consists of 4-items that assess the degree to which pain interferes with various aspects of life.
Items are scored on a 1 ("Not at all") to 5 ("Very much") scale with a range of 4 - 20.
Higher scores indicate greater pain interference
|
Baseline, Week 24
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in pain intensity based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 version 2.0
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
There is one question that participants select 0 (no pain) - 10 (worst imaginable pain).
|
Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
|
Change in the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Cognitive function
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
There are 2 questions regarding cognitive function where participants select answers from not at all (1)-very mush (5) regarding cognitive function.
There is a total of 10 points where higher scores mean higher cognitive function.
|
Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
|
Change in the physical function based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 version 2.0
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
There are 4 questions that participants will select from without any difficulty (5) to unable to do (1).
There are a total of 20 points where higher scores indicate higher physical function.
|
Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
|
Change in anxiety based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 version 2.0
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
There are 4 questions that participants will select from never (1) to always (5).
There are a total of 20 points where lower scores indicate lower levels of anxiety.
|
Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
|
Change in depression based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 version 2.0
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
There are 4 questions that participants will select from never (1) to always (5).
There are a total of 20 points where higher scores indicate higher levels of depression.
|
Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
|
Change in fatigue based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 version 2.0
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
There are 4 questions that participants will select from not at all (1) to very much (5).
There are a total of 20 points where higher scores indicate higher levels of fatigue.
|
Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
|
Change in sleep disturbance based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 version 2.0
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
There are 4 questions that participants will select from.
Question 1 participants will select from Very poor (5) to very good.
Questions 2-4 participants will select from not all (5) to very much (1).
There are a total of 20 points where higher scores indicate higher sleep disturbances.
|
Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
|
Change in ability to participate in social roles and activities based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 version 2.0
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
There are 4 questions that participants will select from never (5) to always (1).
There are a total of 20 points where lower scores indicate more difficulty participating in social roles.
|
Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
|
Change in pain interference based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 version 2.0
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
There are 4 questions that participants will select from not at all (1) to very much (5).
There are a total of 20 points where lower scores indicate less pain interference.
|
Baseline, Week 24 (initial group), Week 52 (NPP group)
|
|
Change in pain interference based on the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 29 version 2.0 - between baseline and 52 weeks for NPP participants
Time Frame: Baseline, Week 52 (T5)
|
There are 4 questions that participants will select from not at all (1) to very much (5).
There are a total of 20 points where lower scores indicate less pain interference.
|
Baseline, Week 52 (T5)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Daniel Clauw, MD, University of Michigan
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- HUM00214375
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Chronic Lower Back Pain
-
Adia Med of Winter Park LLCRecruitingLower Back Pain | Chronic Lower Back Pain | Chronic Mechanical Lower Back PainUnited States
-
Neuronoff, IncOhio Pain ClinicCompletedChronic Pain | Lower Back Pain ChronicUnited States
-
Clinique de la Côte d'EmeraudeNot yet recruiting
-
Texas Back InstituteRecruitingChronic Lower Back PainUnited States
-
New York Institute of TechnologyRecruitingChronic Lower Back PainUnited States
-
CognifiSense Inc.University of Colorado, BoulderRecruitingChronic Pain | Chronic Back Pain | Chronic Lower Back Pain (CLBP)United States
-
AppliedVR Inc.Completed
-
Canandaigua VA Medical CenterFoot Levelers, Inc.; Northeast College of Health SciencesTerminatedBack Pain Lower Back ChronicUnited States
-
Ondokuz Mayıs UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
University of MinnesotaRecruitingChronic Lower Back PainUnited States
Clinical Trials on Structured and tailored PainGuide
-
Erasmus Medical CenterRecruitingMalnutrition, ChildNetherlands
-
University of California, San FranciscoNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)CompletedHIV Infections | Acquired Immunodeficiency SyndromeUnited States
-
University of Illinois at ChicagoRockefeller UniversityRecruitingNeoplasms | Advance Care PlanningUnited States
-
Qatar UniversityHamad Medical Corporation; Weill Cornell Medical College in QatarCompletedAcute Coronary SyndromesQatar
-
University of North Carolina, Chapel HillPatient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute; Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and other collaboratorsEnrolling by invitationA Comparison of Two Brief Suicide Prevention Interventions Tailored for Youth on the Autism SpectrumSuicidal Ideation | Suicide | Autism Spectrum Disorder | Suicidal and Self-injurious BehaviorUnited States
-
The Miriam HospitalCompleted
-
Pok Oi HospitalNot yet recruitingSmoking ( Cigarette)Hong Kong
-
University of TennesseeNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK); University... and other collaboratorsCompletedObesity | OverweightUnited States
-
Boston Medical CenterNational Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)Completed
-
Hospital General de México Dr. Eduardo LiceagaNational Council of Science and Technology, Mexico; Universidad Nacional Autonoma... and other collaboratorsUnknownLiver Diseases | Obesity | Metabolic Syndrome | Exercise | Childhood Obesity | Cardiovascular Risk FactorMexico