A Comparative Study of Erector Spinae Fascia (ESF) Injection and Dry Needling Combined With Functional Rehabilitation (FR) in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Who Have Undergone Spinal Surgery (SPIN-NEED) (SPIN-NEED)

April 21, 2026 updated by: Clinique de la Côte d'Emeraude

Chronic low back pain represents a major public health issue, with an estimated prevalence of up to 23% in the adult population and a significant impact on quality of life and functional capacity. Among these patients, a significant proportion undergo spinal surgery-including laminectomy, discectomy, or spinal fusion-when conservative treatment has failed to provide adequate relief. Current treatment strategies involve functional spinal rehabilitation (FSR). Due to the multifaceted and complex pathophysiology of this chronic pain condition, we have previously addressed the spinal syndrome in terms of its functional and muscular component: the myofascial expression. In our clinical practice, we have introduced a minimally invasive paravertebral procedure, guided by ultrasound, targeting the fascia of the erector spinae muscles in the lower lumbar region. The goal of this procedure is to provide pain relief to the patient, enabling them to better adhere to the rehabilitative treatment (functional restoration of the spine) and ultimately improve the patient's quality of life within their environment. This evaluation of professional practices highlights a clear clinical indication in favor of infiltration of the erector spinae fascia, with a significant majority of patients reporting improved pain relief and better adherence to rehabilitation.

Thus, within a coordinated, multidisciplinary care approach, this intervention appears to address patient expectations regarding comfort and leads us to consider the myofascial component of the complaint. The proposed paravertebral intervention is also appropriate in accordance with the updated recommendations, which are very restrictive in the context of a surgically treated spine (PSPS-2). This assessment of current practices justifies the implementation of a prospective controlled study. Through this study, we aim to investigate the treatment's effects and evaluate its pharmacological (via the anti-inflammatory action of corticosteroids) and mechanical (via needle-induced muscle stimulation) components.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

120

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with chronic back pain, with previous surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with specific or common low back pain
  • Patients receiving posterior subcutaneous spinal cord stimulation
  • Patients with a life expectancy of less than 12 months
  • Patients with a contraindication to corticosteroid injections (coagulation disorder)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding patients
  • Patients with cognitive and/or psychobehavioral disorders

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Placebo Comparator: spinal rehabilitation + placebo
simulated procedure (non-invasive puncture with a stylet in the lower lumbar region, medial to the posterior superior iliac spine-on both sides).
Sham Comparator: spinal rehabilitation + dry needling
Dry needle insertion guided by ultrasound, with manipulation targeting the spinal erector muscles medial to the posterior superior iliac spine-on both sides.
Experimental: spinal rehabilitation + infiltration
Injection of half a vial of Diprostene 1.5 mL + Lidocaine 1.5 mL-under ultrasound guidance-targeting the erector spinae muscles medial to the posterior superior iliac spine-bilaterally

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in lumbar functional disability
Time Frame: between day 0 (intervention) and 3 months after intervention
assessed by Oswestry disability index (ODI)
between day 0 (intervention) and 3 months after intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain evaluation
Time Frame: day 0, 1 month, 3 months
Assessed by visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain)
day 0, 1 month, 3 months
Quality of life evaluation
Time Frame: Day 0, 1 month, 3 months
Measured by Study Questionnaire Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36) : The SF-36 has eight scaled scores; the scores are weighted sums of the questions in each section. Scores range from 0 - 100 (Lower scores = more disability, higher scores = less disability)
Day 0, 1 month, 3 months
lumbar function evaluation
Time Frame: Day 0, 1 month, 3 months
muscle and functional performance measured using metrological score SHIRADO ITO
Day 0, 1 month, 3 months
Measuring the patient's avoidance behaviors
Time Frame: Day 0, 1 month, 3 months
Assessed by Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ) : The complete FABQ is administered as a single 16-item questionnaire. Patients rate each item on a 7-point scale: 0 = completely disagree, 6 = completely agree.
Day 0, 1 month, 3 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julien Baglione-Streliski, MD, Emerald Coast Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

May 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2029

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 21, 2026

Last Verified

April 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Back Pain Lower Back Chronic

Clinical Trials on Placebo

Subscribe