Ultrasound for Acute Field Triage of Stroke (USTRAFAST)

May 2, 2023 updated by: University Hospital, Tours

Ultrasound for Acute Field Triage of Stroke: a Pilot Study- Ustrafast

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is responsible for considerable morbidity and mortality worldwide and has serious medico-economic and psychosocial consequences. Before the advent of mechanical thrombectomy (TM), care and telestroke networks had focused their efforts on the rapid administration of a thrombolytic agent, tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), intravenously ( IV), to all eligible patients with ischemic stroke. These care networks have been shown to improve both patient prognosis by improving early vascular recanalization, the overall quality of neurovascular care within the network, and costs at network hospitals.

In 2015, the effectiveness of another treatment, TM, for some acute ischemic stroke patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) created new challenges for the effective triage of suspected patients stroke, especially in the prehospital setting.Indeed, non-OLV patients should receive intravenous thrombolysis without delay and thus should be transported to the nearest facility with neurological capacity. thrombolysis.In contrast, the efficacy of thrombolysis remains limited for patients with LVO stroke who likely benefit from direct transport from the field to a comprehensive stroke center capable of performing TM. In these patients, stopping at a local center to initiate thrombolysis can delay revascularization and worsen the prognosis.These sorting strategy paradigms, called "mothership" and "drip and ship"

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Investigators hypothesize that the use of a compact DTC system may optimize prehospital triage of participants with suspected stroke by EMS emergency medical services with rapid applicability and limited training required. The objectives of this study will be to:

  1. assess the role of cerebral pulsatility index as a marker of proximal vessel occlusion, and its added value to PSV, EDV, RI and MV,
  2. optimize the engineering and ergonomics parameters of the DTC mechanical support system,
  3. test its speed of application on healthy subjects, then on participants who have suffered a confirmed stroke, and
  4. to use this data to derive a fully operational DTC system and a dedicated interface for a larger scale real test in a pre-hospital setting.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

Healthy subjects (recruitment via the CIC-IC):

  • Adults (Age >18),
  • free from any known cerebral pathology,
  • having given their informed, dated and signed free consent
  • and affiliated with a French social security scheme (CMU accepted)

Stroke topics:

  • Adult patients (age >18 years),
  • admission for suspected stroke with a severity scale assessed by an NIH Stroke Scale > 10 with or without signs of cortical damage.
  • Onset of symptoms < 24 hours.
  • Proximal arterial occlusion confirmed by angio-MRI or angio-scan,
  • free informed consent, dated and signed,
  • affiliated to a French social security scheme (CMU accepted).

Exclusion Criteria:

(healthy subjects and patients)

  • Realization of the transcranial Doppler likely to delay the treatment of the patient
  • Patient eligible for thrombectomy. vs
  • Major agitation (+3 on the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale) (done only when the patient is agitated).
  • Inability of the patient to consent due to the severity of the clinical symptoms, and the absence of an available relative.
  • History of severe head trauma, or significant deformation of the skull.
  • Recent craniofacial trauma with recent scalp or facial wounds.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: transcranial doppler and pulsatility measurements

PATIENT and HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS:

The intervention consists of:

- perform a simultaneous bilateral DTC acquisition of 20 seconds per hemisphere, and The ultrasound system used will be: ArtUS ultrasound system (Telemed, Vilnius, Lithuania), with transcranial probe P5-1S15-A6.

Two identical devices (ultrasound + probe) will be used, each scanning a cerebral hemisphere. They each carry the CE mark and will be used in accordance with the CE mark. https://www.pcultrasound.com/products/products_artus/

perform a simultaneous bilateral DTC acquisition of 20 seconds per hemisphere

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurements of cerebral pulsatility (maximum and average), peak diastolic and systolic velocity, peak systolic velocity, resistance index and pulsatility
Time Frame: 1 day
The main outcome is to measure the cerebral pulsatility which will be assessed by all this diiferents measures in the same time such as : Peack diastolic and systoic velocity in cm/sec which will help to determine the resistance index and the pulsatility index at end with the help of the transcranial doppler at letf side and right side. The parameters will be compared at the level of a patient (healthy vs pathological hemisphere), and of the hemispheres (all healthy vs pathological hemispheres).
1 day

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Patient questionnaire on per-procedure comfort parameters
Time Frame: 1 day
he secondary outcomes are to evaluate if wearing a support to assesed the pulsatility billateraly might generate some disconfort to the patient. That is why we will use one of the universal scale, the Likert confort to disconfort scale to evaluate disconfort from the great confort imaginale to the great disconfort imaginable of the participants.
1 day

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

July 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

July 2, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

July 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 30, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2023

First Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 5, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2023

Last Verified

May 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Acute Ischemic Stroke

Subscribe